1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

World Vision allowed to hire only Christians

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by mandym, Oct 8, 2011.

  1. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Ratings:
    +0

    http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=36296
     
  2. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Ratings:
    +127
    This sets a VERY important precedent to avoid similar cases throughout Europe which are going the other way. Good decision.
     
  3. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    How would it set precedent in Europe?
     
  4. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Ratings:
    +127
    It doesn't. It sets a precedent in the US to protect from what is happening here.
     
  5. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    I see.............
     
  6. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    If you take money from the taxpayers, then the government should have the right to have a say how it is used on behalf of the taxpayer. If you don't wish to have that, then don't be on the take from the taxpayers.

    "When a religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and God does not care to support it, so that its professors are obliged to call for the help of the civil power, 'tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one." - Benjamin Franklin from Poor Richard's Almanac, 1754
     
  7. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    No one takes money from the tax payers here. That is silly
     
  8. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    You must have missed the opening sentence, which is the crux of the issue...

    (emphasis mine)
     
  9. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,725
    Ratings:
    +662
    Faith:
    Baptist
    and just who is "the government" much of the money I pay into taxes is not used in a way I see fit. Unfortunately, "the govt" is now codding to those who insist anyone with more money have a responsibility to support them - even if said individuals are too lazy to work.
     
  10. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    Going off topic eh? So would you support federal funding of a charity run by Muslims?
     
  11. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,705
    Ratings:
    +379
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When I Ran A Christian School, I Hired....

    ....only born-again believers. The people that sent their children to the school (pre through grade 6) had expectations that we were a Christian school. Nothing less than professing believers would do for me.

    I should note that I didn't turn people away for their religious affiliations, as long as they could confirm in their written and verbal testimony that they were born again.

    This was in the early 70's so I never had a problem. Today, I'd probably be facing law suits for discrimination.

    What a sad thing when an employer can't hire who they want. :tear:
     
  12. Havensdad

    Havensdad New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Ratings:
    +0
    Nope. The Federal Government should not be funding anyone, period. If they decide to use a religious organization like World Vision, though, with its established resources, then they should be forced to allow the charity to run its organization as it sees fit.

    The states are free to establish their own religious rules as they see fit. In the early days, the varying states had their own established religions; some were Anglican, some were Presbyterian, and so on.
     
  13. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    Agreed!

    Sorry, but no. While there were state religions, they have been rendered unconstitutional by case law. For a good article on this, go to http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_reli.html
     
  14. Havensdad

    Havensdad New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Ratings:
    +0
    Sorry, but I disagree. Activist judges reinterpreting the constitution does not undo its original intent. The writings of the founders and the authors of the constitution envisioned a land where people were free to practice their own religion, in part, by establishing localized governments and groups of individuals of particular religions. Excluding religion from all government, is in fact a de-facto establishment of atheism.
     
  15. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    You may disagree, but that doesn't change the fact that the body of case law is a legitimate part of our system. The judiciary interprets the law by way of rulings in specific disputes over how it is applied.
     
  16. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    precedence or case law should never undermine the original intent
     
  17. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    I understand that is your opinion, but it doesn't line up with how it is. The founders set up a judiciary for this purpose. Law is an ever evolving thing, refined as cases settle ambiguities and areas of dispute. Your view of the law is not factual nor practical. We are not bound by intent of the dead, but as a living society can decide how the law applies.
     
    #17 Magnetic Poles, Oct 9, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 9, 2011
  18. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Ratings:
    +0
    Then other non-profits should be permitted to ban the hiring of Christians? Pro-abortion clinics, for example?
     
  19. Ruiz

    Ruiz New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,021
    Ratings:
    +1
    I think everyone should be able to hire whoever they want. However, the 1st Amendment protects religion in a special way. The state cannot make us or prohibit us from our religious activity.
     
  20. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,725
    Ratings:
    +662
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree 100%

    An employer should have the right to hire (& not to hire) or fire anyone for any reason they so deem
     
Loading...