Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Absolutely not.
If they can't afford to have a kid, give it up for adoption.
To allow a girl in trouble to continue their education I think it would be a great idea.
MY wife and I have discussed this several times and she really has a heart for this type of ministry.
HOWEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In the absence of abstinance education and Christian Counselling I think it would be counter productive.
That is, if run inside and by the school system planned parenthood would be involved and that would only make things worse...
The ideal situation is for the Christian Pregnancy centers to have an off-shoot ministry where some form of transportation to get the moms to school and a place to take care of the babies free would be provided.
A computer and study center would also be good...
This would do two things...
First, provide a viable alternative to abortion for teens wishing to complete their education.
Two, and most importantly, provide a place of Christian Refuge and Education towards the Salvation of their souls...
You've probably just "unparented" probably 25% of the children born today.![]()
Sounds good![]()
Seriously? When we had our first child, my husband was starting a new business. We were working off of my salary and there was no way we could afford having a baby. But we did it and that baby will be 21 in just a couple of weeks. Should we have put her up for adoption? Even my doctor says "Don't wait until you can afford a baby because then you'd never have one."
Obviously you could afford it. I'm speaking of situations where a person is unable to provide for their child.
Who says that because a high school student had a baby means that the child is not provided for? Yes, oftentimes the grandparents need to step in to help but the child is provided for. If the mother wishes to not keep her baby, that's fine but if she chooses to keep it, what's the big deal with providing child care for her to finish her education? Many large companies provide free child care for their employees. Does that mean they should also put their child up for adoption?
There's quite a difference between an employer providing child care (and trust me it's not free, it is figured into a person compensation package) and a public school providing child care.
If you wish to provide child care to people that can't afford it, by all means set up a charity to do so. Using my tax dollars to fund some else's poor decision is not right.
That's the big deal with providing child care for her to finish her education. I shouldn't have to pay for her poor choices. If she makes a poor choice and gets herself in a bad situation, then she either needs to step up and get a job (or two), her family needs to help her, her church needs to help her, or a private charity needs to help her. Tax payers should not be on the hook for other people's poor choices.
Well, guess what? She has a better chance of NOT sucking the tax payers dry if she has an education. So we either pay a little for some childcare now or a lot later on welfare. I'd rather do the childcare.
The young men who father these babies abandon them and merely go off to father more children. These "fathers" are allowed to finish their education, get scholarships, go off to college, and basically have a life.
Why aren't the fathers held accountable? There is a system in place to require child support from the fathers. You act as if the fathers can simply walk away and have no obligation at all. That's simply not the truth of it.
No.Do you think this service should be provided?
First and foremost, the public is not responsible for the care of another's child.Why or why not?
None.How much does concern for the child's baby play into your thinking?
None. In a system in which money is extorted from me to educate another's child, you would now being saying I'm responsible for another's bad behavior and the cost thereof. But I'm not. She is.How much does concern that the teenager receive a full education play into your thinking?
Wouldn't a daycare in highschools send the message to the students that out of wedlock children by children is acceptable?
Schools already provide the "how to" in the form of sex ed, free condoms in many cases and now free day care?
What's next?
A cozy little place to get away for the prospective parents so that they can rendezvous without parental interference?
Wouldn't a daycare in highschools send the message to the students that out of wedlock children by children is acceptable?
Schools already provide the "how to" in the form of sex ed, free condoms in many cases and now free day care?
What's next?
A cozy little place to get away for the prospective parents so that they can rendezvous without parental interference?