Obama Admits Kenyan Birth?

No he didnt he plastered a photocopy of a dubious BC that lacks any credibility on his site and Daily Kos.

 

I don't understand what looks fake about this BC.

http://cdn.factcheck.org/imagefiles...ma Birth Certificate/BO Birth Certificate.jpg

It appears to be a certified copy which is more than what I have...

 

More'n I got, as well!

But I'll also assure you, Sen. Obama should have absolutely no worries as to whether or not I will vote for him, because whether or not this is/was even potentially questionable, was not then, nor is it now, even an issue with me. And I certainly would not vote for one I knew did not fulfill the Constitutional requirement for the office.

Ed

 

Got to give this man credit for being honest... :thumbs:

I agree, if you're not going to vote for him just don't vote for him. No need worrying about things that won't change your mind either way.

 

Does it really matter?

One word my friend - CONSTITUTION

Whether one votes for Obama or not - all Americans should support the Constitution.

 

Either Obama is lying about being a natural born citizen or his grandmother is lying by saying he was NOT born in the US, but in Kenya, and she attended his birth.

No wonder Obama refuses to release his birth certificate! It is quite possible that, legally, he cannot run for President.

When one runs for public office, his/her life becomes an open book. Obama should have anticipated this and made sure he had all his ducks in a row.

McCain and Palin have said they will produce any documentation asked for...why won't Obama?

What is he hiding???

 

I am really having a hard time keeping my grubby little fingers out of this discussion .

 

I officially allow you permission to rescind your initial statement about no longer participating in these discussions.

You may make 2, or at the most 3 posts....and then only if someone may interpret your posts as favorable to McCain....or unfavorable to Obama.

You can decide which way to go on that one.:1_grouphug:

peace to youraying:

 

A win by disqualification is still a win!:laugh:

peace to youraying:

 

Unfavourable to Obama is no problem, I do that all the time, Favourable to McCain is a bit tougher .

Nope - I made a commitment.

I will resist
I will resist
I will resist

 

Posting a photo on the internet is not releasing it. Factcheck is owned by the Annenburg Corp which has always had close ties to Ayers and Obama. Nothign is credible about it.

 

Whew - almost commented

 

But he's already been cleared by the FBI who appear to be satisfied since he is receiving security briefings. This this has nothing to do with satisfying the constitution. The constitution has been satisfied or he wouldn't be getting briefed on national secrets. This is about satisfying a guy who filed a lawsuit and some conservative voters whose not going to give him their votes no matter what he does.

By the way, anyone can file a lawsuit but that in no way says it's valid, just that you filed.

 

Which is what prompted the asking of her health records. What is Palin hiding by not producing her health records? I honestly believe she is hiding nothing which is what I believe about Obama. The FBI has cleared Obama so I am satisfied.

 

True, but this one is a shot in the dark which means innocent bystanders might get hit. This has prompted some to wonder why Palin hasn't produced her health records.

I consider that dumb since she's a mother of 5 and is looking strong on the campaign trail 6 months after having her 5th child. She also jogs for miles per day. But hey, like I said, shooting in the dark causes unintended results.

 

I was under the impression Fact Check posted images of what "the press" was invited and allowed to view, touch, handle, photo etc... which is also what was submitted to the government to obtain his clearance for the job. I could be wrong but I don't see the government asking for the document so they must be satisfied.

 

Go ahead, you earned it... :thumbs:

 

I like this...

So the case basically said don't let Obama run because potentially he may be "subsequently found to be ineligible" which would mean "he and other voters would be disenfranchised".

We can say this about any candidate, don't let them turn because we might someday find out they were not qualified and me and other voters would be disenfranchised... :thumbs: