HEBREWS 1:5

"For unto which of the Angels said He at any time: 'Thou art My Son, this day have I begotten Thee...and again when He brings forth the First-born..." (also verse 6a).

Here verse six holds the answer to the words in verse five (This day...). Here Paul says "again, when He brings forth the First-born". By using the Greek παλιν, Paul meant, "once more" (E Robinson; Greek-English Lexicon, p.586; J Parkhurst Greek-English Lexicon, p.453). Verse six clearly refers to the Second...

The ways of Salvation . part - 2

Sacrificing everything for the Lord brings Salvation.

29.And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields for My name’s sake, will receive a hundredfold, and will inherit Eternal Life." (Matthew 6.33, 19.29) (Mark 10.28-30) (Luke 18.28-30)

Luke 18.29-30.42
29.And He said to them, “Truly I tell you, there is no one who was left house or wife or brother or parents or children for the sake of the Kingdom of...

To all them which believes in suppositions like "be caught Pre-trib" or "Mid-tribe", get ready. The abomination of desolation is on the way just ahead (Daniel 9:v.27-last week), and will manifest itself very soon, so ...
Come, my people, enter thou into thy chambers, and shut thy doors about thee: hide thyself as it were for a little moment, until the indignation be overpast. For, behold, the Lord cometh out of his place to PUNISH the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth...

I have always held to the belief that the KJV is inspired but mostly because that’s all I’ve heard all my life as a Christian. I’m not sure now a days where I stand on that. I’ve heard some arguments from others as to why they believe it’s not inspired, and it has made me wonder a bit. Feel free to post your position on this and try to quote some scriptures in order to back up your reasoning. Thank you and God bless.

the Lord Jesus read from the Septuagint.
Or any scripture that shows any other New Testament writer used the Septuagint.

Thank you.

I am pro-KJV but not a KJOnlyist.o

Exactly
What is a "Pro-KJV"
How is it different that a KJO?

Does it mean you use other versions
or maybe just certain versions?

Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Some believers hold that the serpent in Genesis 3 was not a literal snake. They believe that Satan appeared to Eve in a snake-like form.

Other believers hold that the serpent in Genesis 3 was a literal snake whom Satan somehow directed to deceive Eve.

Do you believe that this serpent was a literal...

One of two reasons.
1. It is actually God's preserved word per Psalms 12:7.
2. It happens to be over all a more reliable translation with its known faults than most of the modern translations, Isaiah 55:11.

Therefore the "T" of the TULIP is false doctrine.

SCRIPTURE teaches and CALVINISTS believe:

The unbeliever will never freely choose God in his sinfulness because the heart of the unbeliever is wicked and deceitful (Jeremiah 17:9) and from within his heart flows all sorts of evil (Mark 7:21-23). He is a slave of sin (Romans 6:20), is dead in his trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1), is by nature a child of wrath (Ephesians 2:3), is at enmity with God (Ephesians 2:15), and cannot receive...

"GOD NO HAS SEEN AT ANY TIME. THE UNIQUE GOD WHO IS VERY CLOSE TO THE FATHER, HE HAS REVEALED HIM"

This reading, as we shall see from the evidence, is the original as written by the Apostle John. The difference being, that "God" (theos) was at a very early date, replaced by "Son" (huios). Some might object to this, and say that it could be the other way around, that "God" was the later reading of the original "Son". Again, the evidence shows from the earliest Greek manuscripts, and...