Why should we believe anything the C.I.A. says, didn't Pelosi say they were a bunch of liars ?
I've heard it said...'it takes one to know one'.... so maybe you're right regarding her and the CIA. Neither of us know them as well as they know each other.... so they support each other when it serves their interest, and they confuse us with soft attacks on each other when they need to distract or confuse us.
Personally, I've a feeling another 'chaotic' event is being planned and we're being primed for the event in various ways..... propagandized both with distraction and with the staging of a unspecified anxiety over many ....... what should be relatively 'non-issue happenings' ......to prepare us to make and accept the 'proper response' ....when it happens(whatever 'it ' may be).
Will it be more solid that the 9-11 event? Who knows? It could be a false flag.... or just as ambiguious as 9-11.... but just as specific in targeting the next move on the international scene as well as the next move in justifying greater control and suspicion of our country's own citizens!
(I heard there was already a 'covert' operation regarding a hypothetical nuclear event occurring in NY. Whether this was state or city.... I don't know.... and haven't any links to prove it..... but I do get suspicious anymore when I hear of 'operations' although I also believe that exercises for possible disaster senarios help to train rescue, medical, police, and even military for disasterous events.... and reveal problems in response and communications which may be corrected before such a need is for real...... thus protecting us. At 9-11, NORAD, was having such a exercise: When the bombings took place in England..... the Brits were also staging an exercise which so parallelled the terrorism..... that it is like there was EITHER a cordination of events.... so that it was staged OR that there were leaks from the planned exercise to terrorist sources.... which took opportunity of the exercise to stage a real event.)
