Genesis 3:16 (New International Version)
16 To the woman he said,
“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Which was better translation, 1984/2011 Niv?
- Thread starter Yeshua1
- Start date
16 To the woman he said,
“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”
So there was and is still some significant Christian groups against the Niv 2011 revision, as those same groups did endorse the 1984 edition.
Most people against the 2011 NIV are also against the 1984 edition.
Why no comment on WELS?
Why no comment on LifeWay?
Why no comment on the NIV translation of Genesis 3:16?
Why no response from Y1 on the above?
I think that many who liked the 1984 are against the 2011 Niv, as Baptists/Lutherans and others did actually use and endorse the 1984 version, but no tthe 2011 revision!
I already have, as there were several groups who endorsed the 1984, but not the new revision!
For the slow to understand Y1. Please deal with the above.
Deal with the above Y1. To run, dodge and evade.
Well, well. I posted the above on May 1, 2018 and asked y1 to respond to those three questions several times.
But y1 is not in the habit of answering direct, easy questions.
He would prefer to duck and dodge. It would make him feel uncomfortable to address specifics and force him to fess up.
To me that's like asking would you rather have the flu or food poisoning. I am not a KJVO, but I am a never the NIV.
the Niv was an acceptable one, but when the 2011 revision hit, many Baptists stopped using it, including churches and ministries!
What's the matter y1? Does the cat have your tongue?
I have asked the same series of questions in posts 23, 24, 26, 28, 29 and 30.
The questions appear to be easy, but you apparently think they are hard. But actually they would be difficult if you are dishonest.
If you became honest it would be a simple task.
Just three simple questions --give it an honest try with no evasion, no quibbling, no irrelevancies.
I have asked the same series of questions in posts 23, 24, 26, 28, 29 and 30.
The questions appear to be easy, but you apparently think they are hard. But actually they would be difficult if you are dishonest.
If you became honest it would be a simple task.
Just three simple questions --give it an honest try with no evasion, no quibbling, no irrelevancies.
The 2011 version does have several improvements over the 1984, but its gender-inclusive policy makes it unacceptable to me.
Two churches where I'm sometimes invited to preach have switched to the ESV.
Nonsense. But of course you're the guy who'd like to toss the CSB in the trash.
And you're okay with its inclusive language.
Are you asking me or telling me?
Just noting your inconsistency.
Well I am noting yours. You have almost no idea what my view of the ESV is-- I have certainly not expressed a view of it on this thread-- and you can't be bothered to ask because
A. You are almost incredibly rude.
B. You would sooner be ignorant.
You must be going through personal problems. MM. Don't take them to the BB.
That's it, Rippon! Play the man and not the ball. What a great example of a Christian you are!
