Originally posted by Claudia_T:
If it were not for us and our history of doing something about these bullies... quite a few of you out there would be living under dictatorship. ......
I also find it interesting that the foreginers are siding with Bin Laden. Go figure.
Anyway instead of whining, they ought to be helping; it would make things a whole lot easier, but instead they seem to want to make every step as difficult as possible for us by criticising everything our Government does.
Lady, you should revise your history books a little bit. Were it not for the French and Lafayette, you would still be under English occupation and rule. So the French helped you build your country (especially when Napoleon gave you a third of it when he accepted to sell Louisiana - which was not just the state it is today but extended from the Gulf of Mexico to Canada and was literally isolating the East from the West - back to you, because he did not want the English to win). We helped you before you helped us in WWII (something for which all people who fought at the time and then taught their children - my generation - to respect the bravery of the US soldiers who came to die in France).
France knows terrorism and fights it. We have, with the Mossad, the most ruthless secret service, and we help the US, for example, in Afghanistan, where we have troops advising the US and doing stuff the US are not trained to do (because we have experience gained from our era in the colonies, we know how do deal with occupants, and we know better than you do what an occupation means from our own history, from Caesar to Hitler). You have only know the English, and believe me, they were not the worst to deal with, from a historial pov.
England deals with terrorism on a daily basis and has done so for decades, due to the conflict in N. Ireland mostly. England has one of the best army units called the SAS, who go all over the world to teach and help allies like the US.
All these people, French forces (not to forget the Legion), English SAS, are working with the US in regions like Afghanistan. If the French are not in Irak, it is because we believed we could reach an international agreement and go there with the assent of the UN community, which is now a nearly defunct organisation thanks to Bush deciding to jump the gun a little too fast. Another reason for the French not going there is because we have 5 million muslims on our soil, who have taught us how to deal with them, and you do not deal with them with blunt force, you deal with them with a guerilla type of war, because their culture is a barbarian one compared to ours and yours. The US was just not ready for that and neither were the French or the English. Now you and the english pay the price every day. Everymonth more of your soldiers die than the month before. you lost in Vietnam for more or less the same reasons: these people you are occupying do not reason like you or me do. they have their own way of thinking. Air bombing them just is not enough. And if you go in, you have to be ready to see heads roll, because that is the way they do things.
When you say foreigners side with Bin Laden, you do not know what you are talking about, Lady. Ask your husband, he must have forgotten to tell you that the CIA trained and armed Ben Laden, not the French or anybody not English. Thefore please stop insulting foreigners by implying that we agree with what Ben Laden is doing. We want him taken out as much as you do. Maybe when you had him cornered in Afghanistan, you should not have let the Afghans deal with him (result: they let him go) and done the job yourself, as you should have. Don't go complaining now.
Corinne