Then you make entire point of not understanding context.
Go back and read dear brother. That passage has absolutely NOTHING to do with why some people don't believe and other do. Nothing. It is actaully refering to all of Israel (per vs 2, 10 and others), but more specifically the children of the people who left Egypt, but all of them none-the-less. It is actaully not about why some don't believe (as you suppose) but is about them not knowing/understanding till that day God's desire both for and towards them.
In fact, if you will keep reading you will find that some of those very people who were given hearts to understand, eyes to see, and ears to hear with, will turn their hearts away to go after other Gods and when they do they will be cursed.
Also, I notice you didn't touch my question :rolleyes:
Wrong. Only those to whom God gives understanding can believe as 1 Corinthians 2:14, MT. 11:25-27, John 6:64 and many other verses tell us.
It's no coincidence that Saul turned away from God when God took away the Holy Spirit from Saul and sent him an evil Spirit any more than it's a coincidence that Satan entered Judas so Judas could betray Christ. :rolleyes:
Everyone using the word 'force' or 'make us believe' begs the question.
God changes the heart.
He replaced our stony hearts with a heart of flesh.
Not a complicated concept!
RIGHT! Go back and read the context.
Context, Context, Context. Period!
Of course no one has understanding unless God gives it to them, no one is denying that. What is being stated is that God allows all men to choose to believe. We find this in Rom 1:1-32, in the fact that Jesus is the light that enlightens the whole world, and the fact that the Spirit of God is sent forth to convict the world of sin, righteousness and judgment to come (all of which are spiritual truths and found to be exactly what is revealed to the unsaved in Rom 1 not to mention 2 Thes 2:10-12)
Who said anything about a coincidence? However:
If the Spirit of God was upon Saul then Saul was saved but in disobedience and is why the Spirit left him and another sent. Paul himself had a messenger from satan sent to buffet him (his thorn in the flesh) but not for the same reasons a Saul. It was sent to humble him. Judas was already in unbelief before Satan possessed him.
Acatully that verse is prophetic/future for Israel who walks even now with a hardened heart.
(Rom 11 speaks to this a bit more)
Secondly Deut 30:19-20 states if they 'choose life' THEN they will love God, obey His voice, cleave/cling to Him/ and obtain life. Kinda different huh?
We (the church) are the Israel of God (Galations). Even so, If ethnic Jews embrace Christ as Messiah now, wouldn't it be it as many individuals whom God would give a heart of flesh?
Not when you understand the passage is speaking prophetically with respect to Israel's hardened hearts, due to God's judgment against them for their unbelief and eventually God taking the veil away from His people Israel.
If you keep the context of the passages from either Ezk 11 or 36, this event can not be until Christ comes back and all of Israel (ethnic Israel) is saved.
No it's not, it's scripture and scripture is not a human opinion, it comes from God Himself. Most specifically; Romans 9:6-9, Galatians 3:29 & Ephesians 3:6.
Then the flipside also has to be true...He causes us to not believe.
So much for responsibility.
When dealing with freedom, it makes perfect sense.
We are either free to come, or we are not.
If we are not, we are also not free to reject as well.
Words have meanings.
Please follow along.
The strawman was pelagianism.