Marcia
Active Member
Andrea Yates, whose conviction of murdering her 5 children by drowing was overturned, was found not guilty by reason of insanity yesterday. One psychiatrist who examined her, however, is not convinced she was insane at the time.
What do you all think?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/story?id=2245394&page=1
July 27, 2006 — One day after a Texas jury found Andrea Yates not guilty of murder by reason of insanity, a psychiatrist who examined her tells ABC News he's still not convinced.
Forensic psychiatrist Michael Welner interviewed Yates for fourteen hours last May, roughly five years after she drowned her five children in the family bathtub. Welner says he has over sixty reasons why he believes Yates knew her actions were wrong, and he released that list exclusively to the ABC News Law & Justice Unit. Welner, the New York-based chairman of The Forensic Panel, http://www.forensicpanel.com/, was a key witness for the prosecution.
Under Texas criminal law, the standard for finding someone not guilty by reason of insanity is whether the person could tell right from wrong at the time of the offense.
Welner's list includes the fact that Yates called the police just after drowning her children because, she said, "the police is who you call when you've done something wrong." She also anticipated that she would be tried and punished for what she had done.......<MORE>
What do you all think?
Last edited by a moderator: