They are not "historic" premillennialists either then. Historic premillennialists, as they wrongly like to call themselves, like to highlight that the early Church Fathers believed the church was on earth in the tribulation. They also neglect a great amount of material in the primitive Church that clearly proves that they did believe in a pretribulational rapture of the same Church. Darby himself as well as Scofield knew their doctrine was a restoration of the primitive church doctrine. Darby and Scofield erred on their Ecclesiology, however.
Apocalyptic as literary genre and interpreting Revelation
Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by JonC, Mar 5, 2017.
Page 8 of 8
-
The OT Jewish believers worship the same God that I do. Our God is Father, Son (the Messiah), and the Holy Spirit.
Those OT Jewish believers recognized Jesus as the Messiah and continued to worship the same God.
But other Jews rejected Jesus as Messiah and their descendants today continue to reject Him as God the Son, the Second Person of the Triunity of God and thus worship a false, non-Triune God. -
When you're ready to forsake your fallacious argumentation style void of listening to actual positions and thus void of logical coherent sense let me know. -
Are you now confusing Pre-Mid-Post Trib with Pre-Post-A Mill?
But don't confuse Pre-Mid-Post trib with Pre-Post-A mill. Two very different things.
-
Martin Marprelate Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
-
Walvoord states that post-tribulationalism can be the belief of Post- and A- Millennialists, depending on whether such a person is full preterist or not. If they are full preterist, they are not post-tribulationalist, since they believe that it already happened. He is correct on these two points. I don't see how he couldn't be correct. I don't know of any on the opposing side would argue against him on these two points. They are not even the subject of dispute. -
It makes no difference towards my point whether the bible contains verses that support all three rapture theories or theologies. My contention was that Historic Premillennial theology believes that they are the "historic" view of the church, but they neglect the belief of said Church who held to pretribulationalism. The Historic Premillennial position, as it is called today by Ladd and his followers, cannot believe in pretribulationalism either, since their ecclesiology forbids it. Ladd believes in replacement theology and doesn't distinguish the earthly ekklesiastical Jews and Gentiles from the heavenly ekklesiastical ones.
"A futuristic school of interpretation among posttribulationism, however, has also emerged. One of the most prominent is George Ladd whose work, The Blessed Hope, promotes the view that the great tribulation is still future. While other views of posttribulationism could conceivably be harmonized with the idea that Christ could return any moment, Ladd considers it inevitable that at least a seven-year period (described in Dan 9:27) separates the church today from the rapture and the second advent of Christ which are aspects of the same event. Although Ladd’s argument builds largely on the fact of the history of the doctrine and extols posttribulationism as the norm for orthodoxy through the centuries, he introduces a new realism into the picture in adopting a literal future tribulation. His views have somewhat been qualified by his later writings, but in general he seems to retain a futuristic view of the great tribulation with its corresponding doctrine that Christ’s return could not be any day, but that it can only follow the years required to fulfill prophecies relating to the tribulation.
The most recent theory of posttribulationism has been advanced by Robert Gundry in his work, The Church and the Tribulation. Gundry, following the lead of many premillenarians, distinguishes Israel and the church as separate entities and attempts a literal interpretation of many of the prophecies that deal with the end times. In advancing his [ekklesia] theory he refutes most of the posttribulationists who have preceded him. Working with these premises he endeavors to establish a new doctrine of posttribulationism [not historic premillennialism] which he tries to harmonize with a literal interpretation of prophecy." - Walvoord, Posttribulationalism Today -
-
"Today he will affirm that you are his people and that he is your God, just as he promised you and as he swore by oath to your ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob" (NET). -
Christians worship Lord God Almighty and Trust His Word IS the Lord Jesus revealed as the Christ.
Seems the Jews (for the most part), became convinced additional knowledge, was not to be trusted.
Gentiles however readily accept God (the Father) Almighty (Spirit Power) and the name revealed of
Gods Word (first known as Jesus, then revealed the Christ).
Scripture ties the "whole" of God as God Himself ~ Spirit, Power, Word, Seed ~ which applies to thee;
Lord God Almighty. <-- Son, Father & Power/ HS.
:)
Knowledge has been revealed from the beginning. Understanding always comes directly from God.
God favors those WHOM trust and believe in Him.
Scripture reveals WHO that applies to.
Exod.31
[3] And I have filled him with the spirit of God, in wisdom, and in understanding, and in knowledge,
1Kgs.4
[29] And God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding exceeding much,
1Chr.22
[12] Only the LORD give thee wisdom and understanding,
Luke.24
[45] Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
As for number two:You can find the Scripture as well as I can. It is all in there. But I suspect you read what you want to read - rather the way you want to read. Moreover you show no acknowledgment that I gave an answer to why God destroyed Jerusalem. Above, you repeat the question as if I had not answered it.
But I agree with you that this is getting off Jon's topic.With that I will stick a fork here and declare it done. -
The New American Bible has this:
NAB John 8:24 That is why I told you that you will die in your sins. For if you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins."
The KJV has "if ye believe not that I am he", "he" being in italics showing that "he" is not in the Greek text and the I am" is ego eimi same as John 8:58
John 8:58 - Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am (ego eimi).
John 8:59 Then took they up stones to cast at him...
HankD
-
-
Squire Robertsson AdministratorAdministrator
Six Hour Warning
This thread will be closed sometime after 4 AM Pacific. -
Covenanter Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I have an odd taste in music & I have a Shaker music book.
A tune that fascinated me had me looking for new words to go with it. While I was washing this morning, the words came, from Rev. 5:
Let us praise the name of Jesus
He is the Lord of heaven & earth
Jesus the Lion shouts in triumph;
Jesus, Lamb, the sacrifice.
Blessing, and honour, glory, power
unto the Father & Son on the throne;
now the sealed scrolls will all be opened,
now God's plans will be made known.
Tune – Shaker harvest song.
Needs some more verses. I may put in a music thread. Then you will all be singing my song :) -
Squire Robertsson AdministratorAdministrator
This thread is closed.
Page 8 of 8