1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

churches dropping the word "Baptist" from their names

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by jprieto, Oct 15, 2009.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The title Baptist is no more a reproach than the title Christian. Lets drop that as well.
     
  2. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Apples and oranges. To be a Christian has a common denominator. A denomination is not it.
     
  3. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    Some emerging church people have - they use "Christ follower" or "follower of Jesus."
     
  4. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    You paint with too broad a brush, and besides, what is wrong with those phrases?
     
  5. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    I hear this periodically at my church. "We need to do something to attract (fill in the blank)."

    For some its more yuppie couples, others young couples with children, others more teens.

    So my question is usually, "okay, what are you willing for this church to do to attract those folks? And while you're at it, what's off limits as an outreach tool?"

    So far, they've ruled out having the pastor bungee jump into a swimming pool; they've ruled out communion conducted by deacons in clown outfits. They don't much like the idea of a comtemporary rock concert, but seem to lean toward a Southern Gospel quartet. And they're definitely against the preacher and a six-part series on how to have better sex.

    So far, nobody has suggested getting rid of our Baptist name. Whew! Am I relieved. Some of our folks may be pragmatic about doing gimmick stuff to pull in people, but not that pragmatic.
     
  6. TC

    TC Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    10
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Stating what some are doing is not painting anybody - it is just a simple fact. The problem I see with the phrases is that some seem to define them in such a way as to exclude someone who does believe exactly like they do. I have also seen that with the more traditional terms as well.

    I do not see Baptist churches dropping Baptist out of their names much here, but I do see the Assemblies of God dropping the name. They want to distance themselves from the negative baggage attached to the name. The AOG has a reputation for falling for every wind of doctrine that comes along. So they think that changing the name from AOG to _______ Fellowship will attract more people that would not knowingly step into an AOG church.
     
  7. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think deeming yourself a Christ Follower means you are part of the emergent movement, so I do feel that is stereotyping and painting with too broad a brush. I've said this numerous times...it makes no difference what is on the door of a church, but what is contained inside. There was no name on the first church, and God had no issue adding to that church daily.
     
    #107 webdog, Oct 20, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 20, 2009
  8. TC

    TC Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    10
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since some within the emergent movement have dropped the term Christian and instead use other terms, it is not stereotyping - it is simple a statement of fact. Nobody has said that if you say that you are a follower of Jesus or a Christ follower then you are a part of the emergent church movement. I think you are reading that into her post.
     
  9. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    As for our local church, there would be no support for changing the name for any of the purposes stated in this thread. Neither would there be much support for the antics stated above.

    However, in our case, it is not going to do our future much good to cement things as they are to preserve the over 80 crowd. While I do not advocate gimmicks to attract younger people, it is also a fact that there has to be people in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and more than a scattering in their 50s and 60s for a church to continue.
     
  10. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    There's no question that you are right. Ours is a graying church. The question is not whether we should reach out (or "market"), but what form that outreach should take. In this case, the question before the house is about taking Baptist out of the church's name, as a marketing ( or "outreach) strategy.

    And if the question is "what can we do to attract more people to our church," then the question will drive the answers. If the question is how can we take the gospel to where the people are, that will produce a different set of answers. That's all I'm saying.
     
  11. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I agree. Getting the gospel message to the lost should be the emphasis rather than filling pews. However, its nice when the two coincide.
     
  12. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    What does Christian mean to the wider population? It means you're not Muslim or Jewish. That's all. Jehovah's Witnesses call themselves Christians. It does not even mean that you follow Christ.
     
  13. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    I do not know what the answer is. I know what it is not. It is not taking away the word Baptist or attracting people with some kind of entertainment gimmick that has nothing to do with the Gospel. The visitation we do is a good start. This is a tough one. It will take the power of the Holy Spirit to transplant entire age brackets.
     
  14. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Exactly!:thumbs: But hey if you do it otherwise you get to insure that you have big numbers whether the Holy Ghost is involved or not.
     
  15. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't drop the name Christian because the world abuses the term. I don't drop Baptist because others misuse the name. I do what I can to make clear what the terms Christian and Baptist ought to be.

    In all my years in ministry, I never had difficulty getting people to church because I was a Baptist, and I sure don't intend to start now.

    Even when I preach in the Anglican Church, it is clear that I am a Baptist preacher. I have been authorized by the local Bishop to preach in Anglican Churches as a Baptist minister. I would forego preaching if I had to deny my Baptist history.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  16. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Dr.Junior Hill, an evangelist with the SBC, was once told after a service that if he would wear blue shirts when he preaches that he would get a better response to his invitations. He was told that statistically people respond better to blue.

    Jim in the states churches spend more time developing services meant to draw the lost than they do "go ye into all the world". Quite frankly I believe dropping the names has less to do with the lost than it does personal choice. But everything is done, nowadays, under the guise of evangelism. We have this anything goes mentality when it comes to it. The church in America has by and large stopped relying on the Holy Ghost and the Word of God and instead have begun buying blue shirts by the truck load.
     
  17. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    The problem, Jim, remains. How does one remedy the fact that the word "Baptist" is often a dirty word, frequently by our own doing? The options appear to be either to do something or to distance oneself from the word. To do nothing is probably the most unwise cource of action, yet doing nothing seems to be the course of action taken most often.
     
  18. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    I always thought it was Jesus who said, If I be lifted up I will draw all men unto me...

    It is not my job to draw men, but it is my job to preach His word.

    I am not in love with the name Baptist, but the name is very dear to me for what it once stood for. It is the principle behind dropping the name and not just dropping the name.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  19. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    It's not only to preach the Word, it's also how you do it. We should model ourselves after Paul's attitude. I'm sure if the name "Baptist" hindered his work, he would have no problem removing it. He essentially said just that when he scolded those who said they followed him or Appolos in 1 Corinthians 1.
     
  20. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    1
    To clarify: I did not say that if someone uses "follower of Christ" or "Christ follower" they are necessarily in the emerging church movement; I just said that many in the emerging church do use these phrases.

    My problems with these terms:
    1. The bible records that that those who believed in Jesus "first called themselves Christians" at Antioch. Just because the name "Christian" is misused by many, does not mean it's not a good name to use. I am not ashamed of using this name.

    2. "Follower of Jesus" or "Christ follower" (or variations of these) can imply just following someone in your own strength, and/or imitating that person. This is a common view in non-Christian religions - I follow Buddha, I follow the teachings of X, etc. It says nothing about trusting Christ and being "in" Him supernaturally. It can sound to some unbelievers that you think the teachings of Jesus are great and so you are following him. It does not have the same meaning to everyone as does "Christian."

    Many New Agers say they follow Jesus as well. They mean that they think he's a great guy and want to follow his teachings (usually like the sermon on the Mount). Aside from the fact they have the wrong Jesus, they believe, as all unbelievers do, that they can be good in their own strength.

    To me, Christian means taking Christ as my Savior, not just "following" Him.
     
Loading...