Daniel Wallace Misrepresents Textual Support

Mind your Byz.

The following are just a fraction of Byzantine minuscules containing the Gospel of John yet missing the PA:

1080 9th century
896 12th
843 12th
827 13th
817 15th
800 12th
799 11th
777 12th
776 11th
773 10th
770 12th
768 12th
741 14th
736 12th
731 14th
730 14th

 

You prefer the Majority Text, but still have used the Critical one, correct?

 

As a Greek teacher, I examine all texts, but the technical term for my position is Byzantine Priority, which differs in a number of ways from the method of textual criticism of the Hodges/Farstad The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text.

 

Is there a Greek text one can view for that?

 

This one, perhaps,
The New Testament In The Original Greek Byzantine Textform [By, Maurice A. Robinson & William G. Pierpont] [© 2005] : Maurice A. Robinson & William G. Pierpont : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

 

Unless he means Hodges/Farstad, which can be viewed here: The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text (Hodges-Farstad GNT) : Zane C. Hodges, Arthur L. Farstad : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive