Florist discriminated against gay couple, Washington state Supreme Court rules

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by rlvaughn, Feb 16, 2017.

  1. rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    State of Washington v. Arlene's Flowers

     
  2. Baptist Brother Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2017
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    27
    There's a florist who knows what it's like to be raped and sodomized.
     
  3. rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    “You chose to attack my faith and pursue this not simply as a matter of law, but to threaten my very means of working, eating, and having a home. If you are serious about clarifying the law, then I urge you to drop your claims against my home, business, and other assets and pursue the legal claims through the appeal process.” -- Barronelle Stutzman

    Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson has doggedly pursue the case -- not just to define the law, but to egregiously punish Stutzman as well. The justices ruled that Stutzman violated Washington Law Against Discrimination. If so, WLAD is poorly written and should be found unconstitutional by our Supreme Court of the United States.
     
  4. Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just wonder if what would have been he ruling if their were Muslim?