I'm going to tread carefully here because I could easily get in over my head.
Contrary to what my children and grandchildren think,
I really don't know everything.
I like Chuck Blair's little saying better than the one you suggest.
Mainly because I understand the implications related to God's immutability.
I'm going to have to think about the implications of yours.
Not only that, brother, but I'm a little intimidated by people who cite the neoplatonic maximal.
That's another thing my grandkids think I know about that I don't.
The problem is what you hold as to the meaning of those terms as well as how they are applied. Unless there is scripture to back up an assumption the assumption is in vain since anyone can take a word or words and try and make doctrine. May I remind you of the JW's and the Mormons. Also what you mean by what you state is not clear. Are you saying that He has will every event in all history or just some things?
Believe it was CS lewis that postulated that God is eternally in the present "Now" outside of time, so all things known by Him as all happening 'right now' so nothing that would be future/unknown to him!
Also, God in the person Of Jesus upon the Cross identifed personal fashion with ALL the sins everto be done, so he really does "relate" to his creation, being willingly to die in their stead and behalf!
I believe God does what God does without micromanaging all things yet in the end of it all the ends will have been justified. And here are several verses I believe to support that.
Romans 14:11 For it is written, [As] I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
Phil 2:10,11 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of [things] in heaven, and [things] in earth, and [things] under the earth; And [that] every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ [is] Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Eph. 1:10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; in him:
Yes, sovereignty could definitely be added to this short list. But I thought, surely, those other three would be something all of us agree on. We apparently agree on those dots - just not that we need to connect them.
Yes, the event happened in time. After a necessary preparation period.
But the decreeing of it was from eternity past. I'm too lazy right now (too busy actually) to hunt it up now, but there are two or three verses that come to mind. Shall I look for them?
Or maybe someone else knows the ones I am thinking of.
Tom, from your OP, do you then imply or seek to engender discussion, that there are things that were not willed nor decreed by God that have occured, are occurring or will occur?
The main thing I was getting at, QF, was that God does not change His mind as a result of unforeseen events or responses. The original cause for the post was someone (not on this board) speaking about "our ever-changing God".
I am certainly willing to explore other areas, as I have time, but that was the original background for my remarks.
This is a basic truth that I have to admit that I forget. Prepping for my Nehemiah piece I came again across a wonderful short phrase; "The Joy of the LORD is your strength."
BTW, (off topic, I know) that phrase is in the context of believers being overly saddened by their awareness of their own sinful shortcomings. I would love to see a good expositional sermon with that passage, having that verse as the assuring centerpiece.
I would tend to agree with you that God does not change as there is nothing which surprises Him, even in those moments of scripture which seem to indicate that He changed "his mind" or course of action, I would have to say He knew that ahead of "time". Now if someone could PROVE that God changes with respect to what creatures "surprise" him with, the ONLY possibility is that it is the way in which he intended it to be.
Personally, that then would (to me) alter the concept of omniscience.
IF Open theists are correct, and I DONT think they are, wouldn't they be saying God can self limit Himself to NOT know future events , that he would interect in lionear time as we do?
maybe just as Son became a man nd limited Himself, Godhead themselves could choose that?