• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Gun Ownership

Status
Not open for further replies.

Johnv

New Member
It isn't an infringement, and it doesn't infringe. The government currently requires permits and registrations of certain types of firearms, and courts have consistently upheld them as legal.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How would providing a list infringe upon your right to keep and bear arms?

Not that I am saying the government ought to ask for such information(I don't think it should), but if it did how would it be an infringement?
It is my contention that requiring a list of my firearms infringes upon my right to keep and bear arms because it is meddling.

Why do they need the list?
If I am a stamp collector, I am not required to give them a list of my stamps.

I need only report a profit or loss on Tax Day if I auction my stamps.
Otherwise if its just a hobby, they are meddling in my private affairs by asking for a list.

Same if I am a collector of guns.

A required list of my collection constitutes an a prior search because in order to create the list a search or inventory must be made by someone (and "to add insult to injury", I'm the one who is being required to do the search/inventory).

If they (the government) believe I am up to something criminal and they have probable cause, let them obtain a search warrant stating the probable cause for the search (and/or my arrest) and what they are looking for thereby allowing them to legally enter my premises and tear my house apart.

Even at that, I would not disclose any information written or verbal due to the right of non-disclosure to protect myself from self-incrimination (Miranda rights) until I have or am provided legal counsel when interrogated to defend my rights.

Otherwise (and again), they are simply meddling in my affairs and violating my right of privacy by requiring said list.


HankD
 
Last edited:

Spear

New Member
Many use the amendment about the right to keep and bear arms. Is this amendment still in the spirit of when and what for it was written ?
 

JohnDeereFan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
According to published reports all persons filing income tax returns in 2010 (for 2009) will be required to list all guns they have or own. Question; will you answer truthfully or lie about it?

This was passed as an ammendment Feb. 25, 2009 to the 1986 IRS Act and did not come up for a vote.

I have no legal obligation to answer such a question and will not do so. My state already has a record of the guns I own.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
First, this is a real bill that has been tried before.
JohnV said it was an urban myth. No, it has just not been passed into law. The bill is real.
As to the OP, "will you answer truthfully or lie about it".....

Some said it would be un-Christian to lie about it. Guess that is why the Christian religion never flourished in Roman controlled areas.

Roman: "Hey! You there! Are you a Chrisitian, and where are the places you Christians meet, and who do you know the names of others that are Christian?"

Christian: "Well you got me. Yes I am, I cannot tell a lie, we meet under the coliseum after the janitors leave. Here, let me write down the names of the other Christians that come to our secret meetings."
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
Apart from the fact that this law is right or wrong, in (1)which way would it matter that the government lists the weapons everyone owns ? By the way, when you buy a gun (that's the way it works here), the armory makes you fill in a form which is sent to the police that repertories the weapons you bought, is it the same in USA ?(2)[/quote]

(1) Because it is not the governments business.

(2) No. The form we fill out goes to the seller. This is a misconception same as gun registration. I will try to explain.
For example, when a gun is found at a crime scene, the serial numbers and make show the police which manufacturer to go to. Then they can go to who they sold the gun to, (Wal-Mart, Joe's Pawn Shop, or wherever there is a person with a FFL (Federal Firearms License). THEN they see the 'yellow form' that has the buyer's info on it.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
This is not sumething that a mature Christian would do. Immature Christian do it all the time, though. I know numerous Christians who cheat on their taxes, and then brag about it. Sad.

Obviously, you are hanging out with the wrong people.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
Are you saying you(SIC) kill police officers over this?

I will not presume to tell you what he meant, but I will tell you this,
ANYONE who comes to dis-arm and try to leave me defenseless will get all my guns.....bullets first. If it is police officers, (not likely) or anyone else, what does it matter? When a person breaks into your home and tries to assault your family, does KENH say, "Oh, it's OK, you're a police officer, please rape my family and take what you want?"
The wearing of a uniform is not a deterent to my right to protect myself and my family. You can go gently into that night all you want. Just don't think that I will.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
How would providing a list infringe upon your right to keep and bear arms?

Not that I am saying the government ought to ask for such information(I don't think it should), but if it did how would it be an infringement?

"Not that I am saying the government ought to ask for such information(I don't think it should), ...."
You almost got it.......let's try this.....let a government official live with you and your family for the next ten years. He/she will be in charge of you r life through every law, (in the US governments opinion, of what should be.)
Get back to us then.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
It isn't an infringement, and it doesn't infringe. The government currently requires permits and registrations of certain types of firearms, and courts have consistently upheld them as legal.

What part of "shall not infringe", do you not understand?
So what if a court said they could?
Slavery used to be legal, according to 'courts'.
'Certain types of firearms.' Please read me the 2nd amandment and show me where there is an infringement to 'certain type of firearms'.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
Many use the amendment about the right to keep and bear arms. Is this amendment still in the spirit of when and what for it was written ?

No, of course not. Living free and loving life is an out-dated way of living. Try looking up your own country's history. It lost it years ago.(SARC)
 

Spear

New Member
No. The form we fill out goes to the seller. This is a misconception same as gun registration. I will try to explain.
For example, when a gun is found at a crime scene, the serial numbers and make show the police which manufacturer to go to. Then they can go to who they sold the gun to, (Wal-Mart, Joe's Pawn Shop, or wherever there is a person with a FFL (Federal Firearms License). THEN they see the 'yellow form' that has the buyer's info on it.

Thanks for the info :thumbsup:

No, of course not. Living free and loving life is an out-dated way of living. Try looking up your own country's history. It lost it years ago.(SARC)

*feeling in danger, Spear draws his gun and shoots at Nonsequitur ;)*
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BigBossman

Active Member
According to published reports all persons filing income tax returns in 2010 (for 2009) will be required to list all guns they have or own. Question; will you answer truthfully or lie about it?

This was passed as an ammendment Feb. 25, 2009 to the 1986 IRS Act and did not come up for a vote.

Whether this is true or not, I will not register any guns, knives, swords, clubs, spears, pitchforks, or any other weapons.
 

padredurand

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
According to published reports all persons filing income tax returns in 2010 (for 2009) will be required to list all guns they have or own. Question; will you answer truthfully or lie about it?

This was passed as an ammendment Feb. 25, 2009 to the 1986 IRS Act and did not come up for a vote.

For those of you who prefer facts:

Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 - Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license under this Act or a state system certified under this Act and such license has not been invalidated or revoked. Library of Congress THOMAS summary
Fact: The bill is not a secret amendment to the existing IRS code. It is a proposed amendment to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.

Fact: This bill has only one sponsor: the author Rep Blair Holt (IL-I). There are no co-sponsors

Fact: This is not law. It is a bill. Thousands of bill are authored and presented to every Congress. Not every bill becomes law nor has a plausible chance of becoming such.

Fact: This bill was introduced on January 26, 2009.

Fact: The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security on February 9, 2009 There has been no action by the sub-committee.

Fact: The stated purpose of the bill is a response to, "on the afternoon of May 10, 2007, Blair Holt, a junior at Julian High School in Chicago, was killed on a public bus riding home from school when he used his body to shield a girl who was in the line of fire after a young man boarded the bus and started shooting. Text of H.R.45

Fact: Blair Holt's shooter was a 16 year-old who acquired the gun from a 15 year-old. Both youths are thought to be gang members. Chicago Tribune

Fact: Michael Pace, the shooter, was sentenced to 100 years for murdering Holt. Kevin Jones, 17, who supplied Pace with the .40-caliber handgun used in the shooting, was sentenced to 10 years in prison after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit murder. WGN Radio-Chicago

Fact: "From a sample of juvenile inmates in four States, Sheley and Wright found that more than 50% had stolen a gun at least once in their lives and 24% had stolen their most recently obtained handgun. They concluded that theft and burglary were the original, not always the proximate, source of many guns acquired by the juveniles. ~Dept of Justice

Fact: For a brief period, the Supreme Court held in 1968 (Haynes v. U.S., 390 U.S. 85) that felons were exempt from federal and state laws regarding registration because it violated their Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. In other words, only people who were not criminals could be prosecuted for failing to register a firearm or found to be in possession of an unregistered firearm.

Fact: Felons are ineligible for licensing under 19 USC 922 and the provisions of this bill.

Fact: “The law registering firearms has neither deterred these crimes nor helped us solve any of them. None of the guns we know to have been used were registered ... the money could be more effectively used for security against terrorism as well as a host of other public safety initiatives.Former Toronto Police Chief Julian Fantino, January 2003.

That said: If I was required by law to register any or all of my "qualifying" firearms, I would do so.
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As I stated before Jesus practised non-disclosure. Even though He was not totally silent He supplied Pilate only the information He felt he needed to know. The fact is that He remained silent through most of the interrogation. So what happened when He did speak? Did He repent?

Well, first of all thanks for correcting your erroneous statement. Secondly, this is a different scenario. There is no biblical prophecy saying that HankD will remain silent "as a lamb before the slaughter" over his guns. ;)

HankD said:
Since my government allows non-disclosure, I am scripturally free to exercise that right because by doing so, I am yielding to the authority of the founding fathers.

Well let me reiterate this in case you missed it. The biblical mandate doesn't say "The Founders of the USA are the authority God has put over you" no it says the leaders in office now are those put in authority over you.

HankD said:
Also, in the fictional scenario presented in the O/P and posts following, a demand of a written list of the firearms which I own constitutes an a priori case of an illegal search without probable cause as well as the absence of the resultant search warrant with a statement of cause.

Since you're a great Constitutional Law scholar maybe you can help us with the difference between registering your firearms at the request of the government and registering your car, yourself as a driver, your dog, and all those permits for hunting, fishing, etc. :)

btw, that's not an a priori search and seizure case...:saint:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top