But Scripture tells us that ALL of it is inspired of God. He didn't give us the word, no matter who said what, for us to disobey it. If that were the intent, there was no reason to put it in there.
I go back to what I said earlier. God is not a God of confusion. He is a God of ORDER. He did not inspire the words, have them included in Scripture, and then expect for us to say "oh that's just Paul's opinion and not God's truth". That authors confusion and is inconsistent with God's character. And itopens the door for folks to say that was John's opinion or that was whomever's opinion so why should I believe it as the truth?
He doesn't modify his thinking on women overseeing men in the church. For that to be the case, you would have to undo Godly submission as well as the structure of the family that illustrates the principle of Godly submission and order. I say again, SCRPTURE says that this structure is God's way of producing Godly offspring. And if this has changed, there was no purpose to the Cross.
Paul didn't have to condemn slavery. The Exodus shows what God thinks of slavery. Why, after that exhaustive display of freeing people from enslavement would Paul need to speak to it?
Do you believe ALL Scripture is inspired of God?
Historic Riverside Church recommends first woman as senior minister
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Crabtownboy, May 17, 2014.
Page 3 of 4
-
Crabtownboy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
But the more important question is what about all the passages where he does not say if what he is writing is his opinion or from God. These are articles of faith that cannot be proved either way, but must be taken in a way that makes them rational and logical. As I said in an earlier post I firmly believe that if Paul were alive today and writing he would condemn slavery. In his writings at that time he does not though I believe that God never approved of slavery, especially slavery as practiced in the US. -
-
-
Where does Peter say that his words are words from God? Or how about John? I guess the gospel writers can't be trusted in their narrative either.
Paul speaks specifically when he did not hear from God about something but gave his opinion - yet God allowed it in His Word and thus we can be assured that it is His will as well. There is one instance of him saying this in all of his letters. Do we discount all of his writings because of this?
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
-
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
BTW, read the mission statement of the church. It can't be called a true New Testament church. More like a club. I spent about 20 minutes, myself.
-
From 70 to 150 in attendance in eleven years, if I am correct in my reading, is hardly "fill up a church" in my humble opinion. I have done that in a few churches in a lot less years, churches that were not in the middle of town...
-
-
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
-
-
What is Progressive Christianity?
Can someone explain to me what "Progressive Christianity" is - exactly? What is it progressing toward? Is it developmental? Are there steps or stages? Who leads this and from what source are the guidelines? -
-
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Crabtownboy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Eight points of Progressive Christians:
-
Bro. James Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
How about false doctrine with a pseudo Christian façade? This is more man-made religion from the Cainites. See Jude 1-25.
Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
Bro. James -
Item 2: "There are many roads, not just one"
Item 3: "Sinners are equal to the saved"
Item 5: "The Bible is more a set of guidelines than actual rules"
Without moral absolutes, there are no moral absolutes. Consider carefully.
Page 3 of 4