All these supposed proof texts have been examined. Calvinistic exegesis or eisegesis is not the only valid understanding not is it the most reasonable.
God can and has exploited certain events for his purpose without necessity
If God Never decreed/ordained the Fall...
Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by Agent47, Jan 25, 2017.
?
-
Most certainly
0 vote(s)0.0% -
No
1 vote(s)20.0% -
I don't know
0 vote(s)0.0% -
It is impossible to know
0 vote(s)0.0% -
I don't care
0 vote(s)0.0% -
He never ordained the Fall in the first place.
4 vote(s)80.0%
Page 11 of 11
-
This theory is not only scriptural but also untenable -
Squire Robertsson AdministratorAdministrator
Six Hour Warning
This thread will be closed sometime after 1 AM Pacific. -
It would be decidedly funny were it not so tragic for some to flush Jesus Christ laying down his for our sins as the 'smoking gun' of God imagining and causing the very sins He is offering His son for
-
-
I never claimed that Calvinistic exegesis was the only valid understanding, nor that it was the most reasonable as scripture teaches the inadequacy of both human understanding and reasoning. The best that we can hope for (on these types of forums) is that a brother will bring out something to help us overhaul or fine tune our own positions.
It is for this reason that I brought up the inconsistency with your logical conclusion - not to change your mind (that is not my business) but to highlight the problem. Both Calvinism and Arminianism are logical positions. In fact, Open Theism is a logical position. But the position you stated cannot stand on it's own (it is not logical). Your next reasonable step is to rework your theory. If you are able to make it stand, I would very much be interested in learning what you come up with. -
He's going to close the thread in six hours (you can start another).
http://www.baptistboard.com/threads/from-the-mod-ii.90637/ -
Squire Robertsson AdministratorAdministrator
This thread is closed.
Page 11 of 11