That is my first question...since Obama doesn't want to call terrorists, "terrorists!" and terror, "terror!" Just what will he call another attack on American soil, should one happen?
And if the inevitable should happen, will the liberals have the "guts" to blame this on Bush; or, congratulate Biden for making an campaign prediction that came to pass?
Will Obama really have Israeli jets shot down if they fly over Iraq to bomb Iran's nuke plants?
Well that's it for now, but I close with this one thought from my very heavy heart: I have never been so ashamed of a POTUS as I am with this POTUS. I can only hope and pray he doesn't ruin the country before we can elect a new POTUS in 2012.:thumbsup:
My question is if we should have another attack like 9/11 will Obama sit and do nothing in response like Bush did?
More importantly, will we actually be able to get fighterr jets off the ground to protect our homeland?
Given Obama's elequence of speech, I'd guess the words "unfortunate incident" or "learning experience" would be used somewhere, along with "hate," "unity," "mishandled," "accident," and "previous administration's shortcomings."
As usual, I'd look for the current POTUS to use lots of words and air time to say, basically nothing of substance.
But, that's just my lowly hillbilly opinion.
A real president would have been immediately picked up by his Secret service guards and whisked away out of danger.
That's what happened to the Vice President and Condelessa Rice.
Bush was left as a sitting duck in a known location.
Secret Service agents don't make that kind of mistake unless they're told before hand to ignore a warning.
The real question is not whether we'll be able to get fighter jets off the ground, BUT, will Obama have the resolve to give the directive for those "jets" to lift off and attack the enemy where they live, eat, and sleep!
I say, Obama will revert to his trusty old TelePrompter in an effort to bomb the enemy with a verbal onslaught of Obama-like oratory in an effort to talk the enemy into submission....:laugh:
Seriously, what do you think the job of the Secret Service consists of?
I'd say protecting the President.
With America under attack why were they derelict in their duty?
Why was Cheney protected and not Bush?
Answer these questions and you'll begin to understand 9/11 for what it really was not what the government conspiracy story wants you to think it was.
So you believe that if the President of the United States is in a publicly known location when the nation is under attack the Secret Service should do nothing?
Absurd.
What exactly is their job?
I thought it was to protect the President.
Why was Bush thought so little of that they didn't protect him when Cheney was literally picked up and carried into an underground bunker?
Maybe the President was expendable while Cheney was not?
Or maybe they knew a little more than you did. You don't think they were watching radar? You don't think they had secret service all over the place and nobody was going to get close enough to harm the president? You don't think they cleared the airspace around the President?
Again, was the President hurt in any way, shape, or form?
...since Obama doesn't want to call terrorists, "terrorists!" and terror, "terror!" Just what will he call another attack on American soil, should one happen?
Uh, maybe....
1) A fight for the oppressed?
2) first jihad for the true god?(phssssthtttthttt!)
3) a shame, and we will have a stern talk with them at the U.N.
4) deserved. Cause of course, we have been doing this to other people.
5) a boo-boo.
6) a retro-active activity concerning the Arab-American activities going back to WWII culminating in a grab for oil and cheap cous-cous.