Alcohol aside, I don't think it's necessary to be paraoind about whether an action of ours is going to cause someone to stumble. We can, however, express common courtesy to our actions in regards to others stumbling. If an action is likely to cause a reasonable person in our vicinity to stumble, then we should refrain. If not, then we can partake. Doesn't matter if it's alcohol or cheesecake.
The idea that we shouldn't drink because someone somewhere "might see us buy it" isn't a reasonable application of the "cause to stumble" passage. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to buy cheesecake or ice cream, because some random person "might see us buy it" and lure them into gluttony.
But it's a personal decision. What I take issue with is a Christian in Detroit telling a Christian in Florida that he can't drink, because someone it might cause a person in Maine to stumble.
In Moderation....
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by ShotGunWillie, Sep 22, 2009.
Page 7 of 7
-
Whle I do not agree the Bible condemns alcohol in moderation, you can see the point though. It's not really the person in Maine in question. Most here have the sense (I think) to recognize what scripture says and be able to apply that to themselves, but what about Joe Blow that knows you go to the Baptist church and has been thinking hard about coming and hasn't yet. If he sees you walking out of the 7-11 with a 6 pack or even worse, the package liquor store, there's a good chance that in his mind it might illegitimatize your faith, or what the church is about. We know it doesn't, but they might not. Causing someone to stumble is different than throwing a curve at someone who's never picked up a bat. I've been a drinker for a long time. It has never really been a problem in our home, but my wife had pretty much deemed me a reprobate anyway. Probably still does, but drinking doesn't fit in with what I'm trying to do now, so I don't. The last thing I need is another petty issue at home. That's what I consider causing someone to stumble, but I care about her so I'm sensitive to it.
-
Well said. :applause: -
-
I've known plenty of them.
-
OKay, so you knew plenty of them. Jesus knew plenty of them too. They accused Jesus of drunkenness. But what did Jesus do? He ate food and drank wine with people anyway.
Again, it doesn't change the fact, and it is a FACT that scripture permits the consumption of wine.
I can't help but notice the double standard between thread. If the name "Baptist" on the sign causes a person to stumble, well, too bad, you better not take the name off the sign. But if the mere tought of you consuming a drink might cause a person to stumble, run for the hills, cause we gotta bend over backwards to hide the cooking sherry! -
Yes it does, I agree. I don't however see the connection you're making. I think being Baptist is a statement of what and how you believe. Being allowed to drink is not.
-
And yet, scripture permits you to drink, and encourages it in certain isntances.
-
Just call it a personal conviction then. Though its permitted, can you really do it with no regard to your witness? Not could they, or could Jesus, but can we now? What's more important, Joe B's salvation or you being permitted to drink?
-
-
-
-
I'm not casting judgment on you. If you don't have that conviction then it's not for me to say. I'm speaking for myself really. I just don't think its a stretch to believe that in the scenario I presented that it could apply to any Christian.
Page 7 of 7