Is it just my imagination, or are many folks here hostile to people who read the KJV?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Thermodynamics, Jan 24, 2009.

  1. NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    I agree with one point - there is a strong bias expressed in some of the posts in this forum and there is a deplorable attitude to others expressed by some here as well.
     
  2. Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think this sums it up and it something perhaps you, Sal, Askjo, Matthew and others don't get. It's not primarily about you preferring the KJV or believing the KJV is the best translation. It is about your attitude towards other Christians who believe there are other options. Your side treats us all too often as if we don't believe the Bible, or believe the Bible has errors in it, or isn't inspired or some such. You attack us because we talk about truth and belief that truth is worth defending.

    I think a lot here agree with me when I say that I don't care what version you use. Live by it. I do care when you attack the Word of God or other believers who love the Word as much as you do. That's more significant. I do believe it is an offense to God.
     
  3. Baptist4life Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,705
    Likes Received:
    82
    Faith:
    Baptist
    First off..I don't have a "side"! Second there are ATTACKS from BOTH sides! But one side seems to call it a "defense".
     
  4. tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's because it is a defense.

    Defending Bibles from people who say they are not the word of God.
    No one has ever said the KJV is not the word of God..

    But many, many KJVO come here trying to "teach" others that MVs are not the word of God.
     
  5. rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bingo...........
     
  6. sag38 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    2
    Why do some have to be so oversensitive? Goodness, this is a debate forum and if someone disagrees with your position they are going to let you know. Yes, the insults could be less, but when you are dealing with people who like to debate that's going to happen.
     
  7. Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Pastor Larry! Preach it!
     
  8. annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Please note that this new member is a KJVO believer and as such, they WILL assume (wrongly) that there are "attacks" on the KJV when we disagree with their unsupported belief.
     
  9. Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, one side doesn't seem to call it a defense - BOTH sides do.

    The KJVOs among us talk about defending the word of God (the KJVs) while non-KJVOs talk about defending the word of God in its various translations. KJVOs defend a non-scriptural, man-made teaching about a particular translation of God's word while non-KJVOs defend God's word against the false attacks made on it by KJVOs.
     
  10. Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Bro. Tiny Tim! Preach it!
     
  11. NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    I have never had to snip a post where a poster called the KJV a 'perversion,' a 'corruption,' or a 'false Bible.' It doesn't happen.

    I have repeatedly had to snip posters who refer to other versions that way.
     
  12. Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Sister Ann! Preach it!

    There's a huge difference in attacking a particular Bible translation and/or those who use that translation and attacking a false teaching about a particular Bible translation. The animosity here is toward a false, man-made teaching about the KJVs - not toward the KJVs and those who use them.

    KJVOs, especially the extremist KJVOs who post here and at other web sites, take every opportunity they can to bash modern translations and those who use them. On the other hand, non-KJVOs defend the word of God in its various translations against attacks by the KJVOs. I'm about as anti-KJVO as it gets, but one of the KJVs is among the Bible translations I use most frequently. You bet I'm anti-KJVO! But I'm not anti-KJV at all! If I was against people who use the KJVs, I'd have to be against myself, too.
     
  13. Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Bro. Roger! Preach it!

    The true attacks against the word of God are made by KJVOs. I've never seen anyone who is anti-KJVO attack the word of God in any translation (with the exception of a few "translations" created so cults like the Jehovah's Witnesses, the Mormons and the Seventh-Day Adventists can have "scripture" that agrees with their errant teachings).
     
  14. Baptist4life Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,705
    Likes Received:
    82
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You all don't seem to be able to disagree with someone's view on the Bible without making personal attacks on the person or his/her intelligence. My goodness! Can you not see that? That's all I'm saying. This forum is not very "Christian" in it's behavior.
     
  15. NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    There are indeed some posters who regularly personally attack anyone who does not agree with their KJVO position by casting doubt on their faith in the word of God.
     
  16. Baptist4life Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,705
    Likes Received:
    82
    Faith:
    Baptist
    C4K.........continue in your blindness! Sad! Yes, there ARE KJVO people who do that, JUST AS THERE ARE non-KJVO people who do the same! Yet you refuse to admit it.
     
  17. Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,803
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I do find it quite odd that the most prolific starters of KJVO-related threads are not the KJVOs.
     
  18. tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0

    NOW I see it!!!! Thanks.. Thank you for providing yet another attack on a poster by a KJVO!

    You just called C4K blind... Hmmm..

    What do you mean by that? HMmmmm...

    It seems that the ones in the Bible that were blind were unsaved...
    This is a typical attack from a KJVO poster.
     
  19. Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Tim, with all due respect, the unsaved in the bible were spiritually blind. B4L is not saying that C4K is spiritually blind, but blind to the discrimination that he sees on the BB against KJVO or KJVP.

    He did not attack C4K's salvation or his spirituality.
     
  20. tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gotcha Amy.. Thanks.. Sorry B4L...

    See how easy it is to be misunderstood.