It's Been Almost 16 Years...

You are in your usual sarcastic mood.

No one I quoted thought they would encounter a fully intact plane.

Yes, it looked nothing like the site of a plane crash.

It was strangely abnormal.

You believe the official report instead of common sense. That small hole was the site of a large jet airliner that went completely under the ground as much as 25 feet or more and that the earth sealed up after the plane went in?!

 

From what I have read the hole was 5 -6 feet deep and 20 feet in diameter.

That's your speculative theory.

Wow, you have a lot of faith in the official narrative.

 

Back to the Pentagon crash:

This is from Pilots for 9/11 Truth

"Hani Hanjour, took a 757, with zero time in type, did the maneuver described above, a 400 knot 330 degree spiraling dive at 2500 fpm, only gaining 30 knots, then 30 knots more descending from 2200 feet at full power, with a very steady hand as to not overshoot or hit the lawn, inside ground effect, at 460 knots impact speed, but was refused to rent a 172 cause he couldn't handle it at 65 knots? C'mon...sounds like a bad B movie."

 

"Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals from around the globe. The organization has analyzed Data provided by the National Transportation Board (NTSB) for the Pentagon Attack, the events in Shanksville, PA and the World Trade Center Attack. The data does not support the government theory. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not offer theory or point blame at this time. However, there is a growing mountain of conflicting information and data in which government agencies and officials refuse to acknowledge."

 

Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth

"...independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires started the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. This body of evidence, most of which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, instead supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as 'controlled demolition,' where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building."

"Nano-thermite (also known as super-thermite) is, simply put, an ultra-fine-grained (UFG) variant of thermite that can be formulated to be explosive by adding gas-releasing substances."

"Residues of thermite and nanothermite were discovered in the WTC dust, which indicate they were used to destroy the WTC skyscrapers."

 

9/11 Hard Facts

"That there were well documented power outages and swaths of whole floor shutdowns and evacuations in the weeks leading up to 9/11, perfect opportunities to carry up and plant necessary explosives under the guise of 'maintenance' and/or 'retrofitting' work, only fuels well placed suspicions."

 

My last four posts have not been refuted. Facts matter. This is the 16th year since 9/11 and many Americans will not come to their senses and realize the fraud that has been perpetrated upon them.

No one can look at all the incidents of that day and not realize that there are so many unanswered questions, contradictions, gaping holes of logic that defy belief. To believe the official government report is to be willfully blind.

I have quoted Architects and Engineers For 911 Truth. These are more than 2,500 people who are experts in their field. You owe it to yourself to dig in and examine for yourself.

Those three buildings that went down in NYC were caused by controlled demolition. You're only deceiving yourself to deny the obvious. And how, pray tell did Building Seven go down in 6.6 seconds when no "plane" rammed into it? Much of the focus has been on the other two buildings --but you have to come up with how the Salomon Brothers Building went down in mere seconds. If you haven't concluded that something is fishy you are a bit slow on the uptake.

Jet fuel gets to 700 or more degrees F. Steel melts at 2,500 degrees F. Fire not not bring those buildings down.

While you're at it check out Pilots For 911 Truth. Facts matter --the fiction of the 9/11 Commission Report is baloney.

There weren't 19 hijackers from abroad. The whole affair got us involved in several wars and many deaths and injuries. Deaths and injuries of our people and from those abroad. The War on Terror indeed! Members of own government are responsible.

The CIA needs to be disbanded, the FBI is corrupt and who knows how many (17?) other secret government agencies spending tax dollars and accountable to no one.

Facts : our government does not have a good track record.

FDR knew what Japan was up to ahead of time.

The "reason" for the Vietnam War was the phony Gulf of Tonkin CIA ploy.

The Warren Commission Report was a piece of junk.

Lies and deceit, nothing but lies an deceit have happened in front of your unseeing eyes in the last 76 at least.

 

For the majority of you who still believe in the fantasy of the official reports just look at the obvious with open eyes.

The three buildings in NYC did not go down because of fire. Explosives were set up --that's what took all three down. All three perfectly taken down by controlled demolition. To deny this obvious fact you bight as well believe in Munchkins and that you live in the Land of Oz.

I have asked before, and I'll ask again --why did Building 7 go down in 6.6 seconds when no 'plane' had anything to do with it?

Why did Larry Silverstein, the owner of Building 7 say, on camera that it was going to be pulled? To pull it is a term used in demolitions of buildings.

How did steel melt in the other two buildings from "jet fuel" when it couldn't have been much higher than 700 degrees F. Steel melts at 2,500 or more degrees F. ?

Why did so many witnesses at the site --when it happened say they heard explosions?

How do you account for the crisis actor who gave the government line so quickly and concisely when he was so conveniently interviewed on the spot?

Did you know that an entire new staff came in and replaced the former staff in the writing of the Popular Mechanics "debunking" articles?

Unsaved people have eyes that don't see and ears that don't hear. The issue of 9/11 isn't necessarily about spirituality --but man, after this long when will you people wake up to perceive the obvious?

 

Strange isn't it? Not a military plane in the sky in defense of anything that day. The Pentagon, with all the military power at it's command couldn't or wouldn't defend itself. (The latter.)

Strange isn't it? Willy Brown Mayor of S.F. at the time got a call from Condi Rice warning him not to come to NYC on September 11th because of possible security issues --perhaps a "terrorist attack" or something like that.

Strange isn't it? Twenty minutes before 47 floors of Building 7 came falling down in 6.6 seconds the BBC was announcing it had collapsed.

Strange isn't it? That so many Americans remain naive about the odd happenings of 9/11 after all these years. They rely on official government reports like it was the Gospel Truth. When reality is staring them right in the face. The Deep State is still going strong because weak, unsuspecting Americans refuse to face facts. Come on sheeple!