Jack Chick Publications a Fraud?

His hatred was at times almost demonic though, and his did view all MV as being satanic themselves!

 

Trouble is, he LIED about some things in the RCC, while the KJVO myth is nothing but one big lie. So, actually, he was standing only for what he THIOUGHT was the truth, while actually telling lies.

 

It's sad that many have to learn about the wicked Catholic Church from comic books. It shows how far the churches have sunk into apostasy.

 

Well, I have read your stuff on these forums for years and you have some jaw dropping weird doctrines you put out here on occasions. Do I think you are a liar because you are so confused? No, probably not, you are just full of pride and stubbornness and cant accept correction on any subject. I know this because in all the years of dialog with you and reading your response to others with whom you disagree you have never expressed agreement with a single thing anyone has said about any subject and we are liars in your evaluation if we disagree with you on anything, especially the word of God and what it is. It is your MO to align yourself against the brethren with people who you know have a false gospel and promote a false Christ because they agree with you on the KJV bible. I doubt many of your Calvinists friends have passed out Chick tracts because the way of salvation they preach is different from what Chick preaches and yet you have never called the first Calvinist a liar that I have seen.

It is a big deal to call a brother a liar. This man, Jack Chick, has affected hundreds of thousands of people during his lifetime and I pass out his "This was your life" tract regularly. Someone from the RCC could be converted to Christ by reading his tracts, and probably have at some time and in some place, but the gospel he preached in them and the Christ he pointed sinners to was not the same gospel or the same Christ that is preached by the RCC.

Could Chick be led astray by bad counsel? Sure! Is it possible he had some wrong research? It is possible. But to call him a liar is just plain wrong. If ones lifestyle is to lie then there is no hope for them.

Re 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

 

And have you ever proven any idea of mine wrong? No. You CAN'T. For instance, I, & others, have PROVEN SCRIPTURALLY that David's throne (rukership) is still on earth somewhere, that somewhere a descendant of David's is ruling over Israelis, & that will be the throne that Jesus will tale over upon His return. You CANNOT disprove that FACT.

MMRRPP ! WRONG !
I have written against the calvinist TULIP more than once, posting Scripture proving free will, while acknowledging that God has predestinated some people for special work for Him. I think you know that, & said what you did above just to falsely attack me.

I, too, have passed out that tract, & some others that immediately followed it, but, as Solomon did, Chick went off the road & began publishing lies. if you accept his comix Alberto & Double Cross as truth, you have probs indeed. And his pro-KJVO stuff, both during his lifetime, & in the present, is pure garbage.

If I MISTAKENLY tell you something that's incorrect, that doesn't make me a liar, but merely wrong. But if I tell you something I KNOW isn't true, that would make me a liar.

Have you read the 2 comix of his that I mentioned above? I HAVE, and I see they're COMPLETE FABRICATIONS ! How can a Christian read them & know they're not packs of lies? And what do youy call a person who tells DELIBERATE LIES?

Sportzz fanzz, if you want to see the worst of Jack Chick, the 2 comix, Alberto & Double Cross, are available from Chick Publications for USA $ 2.99 at his online store at chick.com.
I rest my case.

 

He was deceived in the end by holding to his extreme views!

 

I view the Church of Rome as Apostate, but do state what they hold correctly and without being hating as he did!

 

His take on the KJV was bogus, and his view on Rome was not seasoned with salt!

 

As I said, I rest my case on telling deliberate lies on the 2 Chick comix I named above. While I've read many of his other anti-RCC tracts, the content of those comix is easily researched, & the comix themselves are readily available to anyone with about $7 in US money, internet access, & a mailing address.

As for KJVO, I call it a myth because, by one of the dictionary definitions of "myth", that's exactly what it is- "a widely held but false belief or idea."

 

The Papal Antichrist still controls the minds of many Evangelicals, Baptists the fringe groups that popped up since the 1800s, calling themselves Christian. It depends on how much study believers are willing to invest to see the hold Catholicism has even over themselves.

 

The dictionary definition I quoted says that.

Actually, I believe it's fading, but it'll still be around, unfortunately, til Jesus returns.

 

Do you sit around reading comic books all day to be so well informed about them? Do you have any quotes from them to support your claims?

 

Agreed! While some popes were likely antichrists(The Borgias come to mind), no pope nor the papacy is THE antichrist/beast of Revelation.

 

The Catholic Church smears itself with its own pedophilia that goes all the way to the top. I don't read comic books, so I'm not familiar with Chick tracts.

 

How many Antichrist doctrines do you hold to? You probably cannot identify them let alone see them. And you must think all of the Reformers were wrong?