My bad. I should have put where does it say they were arbitrarily, unconditionally, elected before the foundation of the world ,to be saved ?
John 6.44
Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by Barry Johnson, Aug 11, 2020.
Page 3 of 8
-
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
-
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
-
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
-
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
John 6.44 is not about predestination either . -
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
1 Corinthians 12:12-13 (KJV)
12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one
body: so also is Christ.
13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free;
and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
1 Corinthians 12:27 (KJV)
27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.
Ephesians 1:13 (KJV)
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after
that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Ephesians 5:30 (KJV)
30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
Romans 12:5 (KJV)
5 So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another. -
Putting together the Scriptures, I start with John 6, Romans 8:28-30, Romans 9, Romans 10, Ephesians 1, Ephesians 2, 2 Thessalonians 2.
They are the ones who will be raised up at the last day.
So, according to John 6:44, one cannot be drawn by the Father and not come to Christ, nor can they not be raised up at the last day.
They are inseparably linked.
In order for someone to truly come to the Son, the Father must do the drawing.
In John 12:32, it's not the same type of "drawing".
If it were, then Jesus was lying and they both can "savingly" draw someone, can't they?
What the Lord chooses to do is always carried out, just like prophecies are.
Also, the Father does the begetting by the word ( James 1:18 ).
So, what the Lord has begun in a person ( Philippians 1:6 ) He will continue until the day of Christ.
Even the fact that we have believed is a work of God ( John 6:29 ), Barry.
Did you miss all those things in your reading? -
I've answered your every question here but you do not seem to be answering any of mine - is there any specific reason for that? On good faith, only to converse together and not to slam dunk any conclusions, I've been sharing all that I believe and the reasoning - but when I ask you for what you believe, where exactly you differ on my interpretations or how you interpret those very specific verses yourself, you simply reply with yet another question.
You've been shifting the goalposts constantly with no acknowledgement of what's already presented. You began with claiming not once in the Bible has election been mentioned in the context of salvation - Rom 9-11 was presented. Without acknowledging your first claim may need reconsidering in light of this, you simply moved on to asking where such election has been mentioned as purposed unto salvation - Rom 9:29 was presented. No thinking aloud yet, and now you ask where such election unto salvation has been mentioned as unconditional - I am going to continue to present verses only because it's profitable unto edification, but you'd do well to reciprocate too.
How does the purpose of God stand according to the election of grace and not works - by proving it is based on Him who calls and not based on what the children have done, good or evil - which is what we've termed "unconditional".
This is quite straightforward according to me - I mean, I'm not even interpreting between multiple passages across Scriptures, the thought process is already laid out by Paul within the same context. But how do you see this differently - what is your exegetical interpretation? I am willing to engage on your own arguments, but make some to begin with. How do you see why Paul equates the jews whom God foreknew and didn't cast away as the remnant elect in Rom 11:2,5? -
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
And then we don't have the issue of ' universalism ' . This now lines up with all those verse youve given which you assume supports the " doctrines of grace ' . Especially Ephesians 1 .4 -5 as its only those ' in him ' who are chosen to be predestined to the Adoption which as I've said repeatedly is the redemption of the body . Rom 8.23.
Also we don't have verses saying that the father or the Holy Spirit is drawing today which is important to notice ..Jesus is said to be drawing after He be lifted up . The Holy Spirit isn't drawing anyone beyond john 16.8 -
From just Rom 9:11, God determined in advance (before the children had done good or evil) something about them - I'm comfortable terming it 'predestined'. I'm also comfortable not using 'predestined' here and simply describing what happened as-is. The similar election of grace in Rom 11:5 has God determining in advance something about the jews whom He foreknew - I don't mind one way or the other describing this as 'predestined'. It's just semantics - why should whole doctrines be dependent on vocabulary? -
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
Predestination is of existing saints to adoption/glorification, not sinners to conversion. (Eph. 1:5, 11; Rom. 8:23, 29-30)
Election is to service, calling and purpose, not to salvation. (Isa. 42:1; Acts 9:15; Rom. 11:28)
Adoption is the future redemption of the body, not conversion. (Rom. 8:23, 15-17; Gal. 4:1-6)
Sinners become sons of God through the new birth, not through adoption. (John 1:12-13)
I don't see anywhere God determined any sinner to be saved before the foundation of the world . I believe Pre ( choose ) destination ( ahead of time ) .
Including anything going on in Romans 9 . Nothing in Romans 9 says any one was chosen to be saved before the foundation of the world .
I agree with you that we should stop where the bible stops..For example God determining the crucifixtion is different to determining the conversation I had at the supermarket last week . Its the difference between inductive reasoning and inductive method..I believe Calvinism is mainly 'inductive reasoning ' -
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
Predestination is of existing saints to adoption/glorification, not sinners to conversion. (Eph. 1:5, 11; Rom. 8:23, 29-30)
Election is to service, calling and purpose, not to salvation. (Isa. 42:1; Acts 9:15; Rom. 11:28) -
Are you saying that in Eph 1:5 specifically, predestination is not applied unto salvation? I'd agree. Or are you taking this as your basis to generalize it as hence not being applied unto salvation across all of Scriptures? I'd disagree - that would be building doctrines around vocabulary.
In my earlier post #47, I have recounted how God has determined in advance the unconditional election of the remnant jews unto salvation - that to me still falls under 'predestined' since it was determined in advance.
-
1. the remnant jews (Rom 11:1,5)
2. elected by grace (Rom 11:5-7)
3. before they had done any good or evil (Rom 9:11)
4. to not be destroyed or cast away (Rom 9:29, 11:2)
5. but be saved (Rom 9:27)
If you differ on any of these, could you provide how you interpret them yourself, thanks! -
Could you also explain the cause and effect of God's giving the people to Christ -> to their coming and believing in Christ (Jn 6:37)?
And finally the cause and effect of God giving to the people -> to their coming and believing in Christ (Jn 6:64-65) ?
In other words, what was not given to the people by the Father in Jn 6:65, which if it had been given, they'd have believed? -
As I see it, we'll have to agree to disagree.
Again, I clearly see that election ( choosing ) is to salvation ( 2 Thessalonians 2:13 ).
It is God who chooses a person and causes them to approach Him ( Psalms 65:4 ) by His work of regeneration, or being born again.
It is to the gift ( Romans 6:23 ) of eternal life, which is to know God and His Son ( John 17:3 ), and it is to an inheritance, prepared from the foundation of the world ( Matthew 25:34 ).
Any other way makes salvation into a cooperative effort that hinges on God rewarding men with a "wage" for their act of belief.
But God does not reward us as men for our works, except with punishment for our evil works.
The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life.
All true good works are "wrought" ( worked ) in God ( John 3:21 ).
So, even our righteous act of belief does not merit any attention from God when it comes to those in Christ having been made clean by the blood of Christ.
It is all of grace, my friend.
I wish you well, sir. -
However, where is the Calvinist vs Arminian argument fun in that? ;) -
Then what do you see in these verses:
-
On the subject of the op, John 6:44. A sliding hermeneutic is generally the rule when context is not considered. I would ask anyone commenting on John 6:44 to use the same rule for interpreting all the verses in that chapter. If that were the case we would have some arguments from the following verse and it might get a little silly.
40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Nobody is arguing that one must see the son to have everlasting life. Yet these are words right out of the mouth of Jesus Christ. He said this is the will of the Father.
The point is, there is context to scripture and before someone steps in a public forum to speak for God about his salvation he should reconcile verses like this that presents us with an impossibility and one that will allow a consistent method of interpretation.
If salvation can only be accomplished by the "drawing" of God, why did Paul write 13 letters to gentiles, telling us all about God's salvation and not one time even use the word "draw?" I will answer that question myself. It is because salvation is by invitation to all and not by the drawing of some.
Context is our friend. -
Barry Johnson Well-Known Member
Any other way makes salvation into a cooperative effort that hinges on God rewarding men with a "wage" for their act of belief.
But God does not reward us as men for our works, except with punishment for our evil works.////// Heres your issue . if I thought believing was ' working/ earning my salavation ,wow yeah I would agree. But that is the most bizarre concept in Calvinism/ reformed theology ( its found no where else ) . " rewarding men "?? again what are you talking about ?? its only a reward or a work/ earning if the bible says it is , but it doesn't . If i believe / trust my car will get me to work . Thats not working. I don't deserve a reward for believing / trusting the pilot will fly me to my destination. They don't hand out medals at the end ." well done sir , we couldn't have done it without you believing "
Romans 4.4
Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
Romans 3.27
Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of FAITH .
Nor do I believe you can lose salvation. And I don't believe I need perseverance of the saints to final salvation or need to endure to the end to find out through my works if I'm one of the frozen chosen .
Have you thought about what the bible says in 1 cor 1.18? it PLEASES God to save those that BELIEVE . Your saying " no God , I read that it pleases you to save those that believe, but I refuse to accept that, and it doesn't please me how you save people " -
[Acts 2:38-39 NIV] 38 Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off--for all whom the Lord our God will call."
In John 6, ALL who are drawn are "raised" and Jesus "will lose none of" ... that sure sounds SAVED to me.
Page 3 of 8