Okay, I don't know about you folks, but I am growing sick of Josh Earnst standing before the camera like that fool in Iraq who answered for Saddam Hussein. Obama has himself a true patriot in Josh! But, the truth is, what do you think of him?
Thanks Carpro. I couldn't think of the name, and even looking up stuff on Saddam didn't reveal his name. That is why we post. To get a little help from our friends. :wavey:
This is not a legitimate poll seeking people's opinions of him.
This is a rant.
There is no option for anything positive, but ten that are all negative.
You appear to have not read the poll, my dear brother. For had you read the entire poll, you'd not be correct in saying none of the ten choices were "positive!" I am so sure that you are wrong, that if you read the items listed, there is no way a man with intellectual savvy to say that number one was NOT positive.
I will say this about Josh Earnest.
He can lie continually without looking embarrassed or ashamed of himself.
His predecessor, Jay Carney, always looked embarrassed/ashamed while he stood before the press, even a friendly press, and lied continually!
Well me fine friend, brother Rolf was incorrect. There is at least one of the choices that is positive, for which I am positive. You need to know that there are a few on the board that see my name as the OP, and the quickly peruse the content and based on their dislike for me, they find fault. It's not their fault, just their judgemental nature.
As for your snarky comment, I am trying to remember just what it was that I had done to earn your ire? Or are you just normally ornery? :laugh:
Well if good old LBJ could have people rise from the grave to vote for him in the TX 1948 Dem. senatorial primary, I'm sure the late dictator of an entire 27-million populated country shouldn't have much problem resurrecting himself in order to run for POTUS in 2016.
Maybe the Lazarus Party could offer him a slot on their ticket.
At least that'd make the POTUS debates a little, shall we say, LIVELIER.
:laugh: :wavey:
First, you state: "This is not a legitimate poll seeking people's opinions of him." But then you post the above. Looks like it is more than a rant now? And if it's a rant, then what are you doing: passing off good vibrations? Your words are in the form of a rant, too!?
As for your view of #1, that is your opinion, another reason this is a legitimate poll. You just validated this post by arguing your view, and contradicting yourself at the same time! :laugh:
I made a comment based on an observation, not on an emotion.
There was no Rant.
I do not see how I contradicted myself.
Perhaps you could explain further.
I still doubt that, at the time of writing, you meant option One to be complementary.
You are too anti-all-things-Obama.
Rather than loyalty as noble (example: a boy lost in the woods kept from freezing by his dog), your general dislike for Obama suggests that you meant something similar to the loyalty a getaway driver shows to his bank-robber partner.
But, perhaps due to this being pointed out, you have retroactively changed your intention behind the listing of that option.
Wow! Simply amazing?! While your gift at foretelling what my intentions are and were, do you think you could amaze all of us by telling me the serial number on a five dollar bill I am holding in my hand?
:smilewinkgrin: