Jury Verdict

I think it was more of personal fear of being attacked, tormented, killed by fanatical BLM or Antifa people, their property destroyed, looted, burned down. Their career's ruined. People are mostly motivated for personal reasons or feelings, not good ones. Now as a believer, you have a different heart, and do not think as the world thinks, but the others are different with darkened hearts. And the flesh gets in the way even with believers who dont always do things with right judgement.

 

Not at all, but that all get due process due them!

 

That we who are not supporting BLM are racists?

 

Just saying that all should get their due process, as do not think it would be proper to have leaders saying the "black guy got what he deserved" would have been right either!

 

Would the Dems and med been OK if the President had stated that he prays that the white cop gets found not gulity?

 

Cannot have just one way predetermined "justice"

 

IMO, the result of this trial was predetermined to be guilty. You could read that in what the judge said before the verdict about Waters comments allowing for the trial verdict to be overturned. A new trial in a different venue with a better jury. 98% oxygen in his lungs and he died of his own self administered overdose. The cops were just like bystanders. How would you like to be found guilty of murder for someone dying when you were not the reason they died. It just was emotionally charged and looked bad on the video.

 

These are the facts. Derek Chauvin is found guilty, by a jury of his peers, on 3 counts of murder. All other opinions here are merely conjecture.

Look into your own hearts to see if your attitude represents Christ Jesus.

 

Well, hopefully when the white cop in Ohio is not charged with a crime folks will not pull out ole race card on him !

 

Backatcha. Attempting to limit “the facts” to a select few is disingenuous, especially for the purpose of then insinuating others have a wrong attitude because they point out more facts.

 

It’s quite possible they felt he was guilty on all charges.

It’s quite possible they felt there were no reasonable doubts.

It was quite obvious that the prosecution aimed at their feelings.

The last prosecutor also repeatedly belittled the closing arguments of the defense in order to prejudice the jury. The judge did not recognize nearly all of the objections.

The defense afterward cited a long list, then asked for a mistrial and that the prosecutor be charged with prosecutorial misconduct.

The judge claimed he thought the objections were only for the use of the word “story.” Though he had stopped the prosecutor and reprimanded him, he was otherwise unmoved.

 

I accept that they returned verdicts regardless, and that they will be appealed, etc.

However, those substituting feeling for reasoning, are not my go-to. Not much point in it with that as the basis.

But, “Do what you feel, believe what you want,” such is the world we live in.

 

We may never know. And I am okay with leaving it in God's hands.