I think you left off the qualifying factor, which is "this feast".
"I'm not going to "this feast". He did go to that feast.
The right time to eat pizza is when no one is around...so I can have it all. :laugh:
Just Something I Read
Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Baptist4life, Sep 2, 2009.
Page 3 of 6
-
-
I am a KJV only, and I am not confused when I read that bible.
I dont knock anyone else for what they read, please do not misunderstand, but I dont trust any other version but the kJB, I posted in another thread as to why I dont trust them.
God did reach me through an NIV, but it was in a most unexpected way, which led me to the kjb.
The slightest change in words can lead to destruction, look what that old serpent did to eve:
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Eve added a little to what God said which was this:
Gen 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
so eve added that little tid bit, neither shall ye touch it, and the devil used that to tempt her.
changing the words of God is dangerous.
I hesitate to say that the bible should say this instead of that, because I was not chosen by the LORD to write down the words of the BIBLE. I trust the KJV.
:thumbsup: -
-
Of course you might have gottne that from another version, but not from the KJV. -
-
-
-
tenderhearted said: ↑The slightest change in words can lead to destruction, look what that old serpent did to eve...
...changing the words of God is dangerous.Click to expand... -
Baptist4life said: ↑Is saying I'm amazed considered bashing? :confused:Click to expand...
Please accept my apology. -
Harold Garvey said: ↑You mean some one would actually question the word of God's validity??? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Say it isn't so!:sleep:Click to expand...
Sad isn't it? Folks here on a regular basis question the validity of my Bible :(. -
Sad isn't it? Folks here on a regular basis question the validity of my Bible .Click to expand...
-
Harold Garvey said: ↑You mean some one would actually question the word of God's validity??? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Say it isn't so!:sleep:Click to expand...
What do the KJVO people say to the fact that the KJV translators used the same methods that are being attacked in the modern versions? -
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Once again this has turned into a KJVO thread!
I really don't care what version that verse came from. My point is this:
"I am not going."
DOES NOT MEAN THE SAME THING AS
"I am not going YET."
Period. -
Baptist4life said: ↑The ... Nkjv, ..., oppose themselves by including the word with a footnote suggesting it shouldn't be there.Click to expand...
NU-text omits yetClick to expand...
Is the writer of this email willing to put the KJV marginal notes to the same test?
A post which attacks every version other than the KJV, especially using such deception, is going to be a KJVO thread. -
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
You people on this forum amaze me..................yea, CK4, I said amaze, I must be bashing......anyway, DOES EVERYTHING HAVE TO BE TURNED INTO KJVO arguments? And did it ever occur to you that sometimes, just sometimes, the KJV might be RIGHT??? Would that kill you to admit it?
You all say you have no problem with the KJV, yet you never fail to try and make every post about it a KJVO thread. I will never agree that ALL versions of the Bible are the Word of God when they say different things. That's an impossibility. I'm not saying the KJV is THE Bible. but I AM saying one version saying one thing and another version either omitting that passage, or including that passage, or whatever, means that SOMEBODY IS WRONG.
I want the Scriptures that God wrote, whatever version they are in, KJV, NKJV, NIV, ESV, or some other version, but they cannot ALL be the correct version when they differ so much. -
Baptist4life said: ↑You people on this forum amaze me..................yea, CK4, I said amaze, I must be bashing......aClick to expand...
A thread which is started tocondemn every version but he KJV, even using deception to do so, is destined to be a KJVO thread.
I love my KJV. It is a master of translational work. I cannot however condone a concept which says something about my Bible (NKJV) that is not true. In this particular case,if the KJV is right so is the NKJV. Would it kill the writer of this original e-mail to admit that? -
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite SupporterC4K said: ↑:( I am sad that an apology (see post #50) is not enough to satisfy you :(. I had much higher regard for you than to expect that.Click to expand...
Anyway, I want to say that I use the KJV, I also have a NKJV. I have read quite a few, though not all, different versions of the Bible. It is not my imagination.............. they do not all say the same thing. Some include passages, some do not have the passages in there. My common sense then tells me that ONE OF THEM HAS TO BE WRONG . My quandary is trying to figure out which ones are right or wrong. But telling me they ALL are legitimate versions of Scripture just cannot be true. The translations come from different manuscripts, which is the explanation for including/excluding certain passages. They cannot both be right! Either they are supposed to be Scripture or they are not supposed to be in Scripture. -
Baptist4life said: ↑You people on this forum amaze me..................yea, CK4, I said amaze, I must be bashing......anyway, DOES EVERYTHING HAVE TO BE TURNED INTO KJVO arguments? And did it ever occur to you that sometimes, just sometimes, the KJV might be RIGHT??? Would that kill you to admit it?
You all say you have no problem with the KJV, yet you never fail to try and make every post about it a KJVO thread. I will never agree that ALL versions of the Bible are the Word of God when they say different things. That's an impossibility. I'm not saying the KJV is THE Bible. but I AM saying one version saying one thing and another version either omitting that passage, or including that passage, or whatever, means that SOMEBODY IS WRONG.
I want the Scriptures that God wrote, whatever version they are in, KJV, NKJV, NIV, ESV, or some other version, but they cannot ALL be the correct version when they differ so much.Click to expand...
Hmmm - let's see where it went KJVO in this thread. Let's look at post #1:
One little word makes all the difference. The KJB does not make a liar out of Jesus. The NIV, Nkjv, and some others, oppose themselves by including the word with a footnote suggesting it shouldn't be there. The above versions have Jesus telling a lie, meaning He's not "the way, the truth, and the life", nor is He God "which cannot lie". But those are not important doctrines according to modern versions.Click to expand... -
Baptist4life said: ↑I'm sorry, CK4, I meant to put a ":laugh:" in there after the "yea, CK4, I said amaze, I must be bashing". I was being funny..........I thought............ My apologies.
Anyway, I want to say that I use the KJV, I also have a NKJV. I have read quite a few, though not all, different versions of the Bible. It is not my imagination.............. they do not all say the same thing. Some include passages, some do not have the passages in there. My common sense then tells me that ONE OF THEM HAS TO BE WRONG . My quandary is trying to figure out which ones are right or wrong. But telling me they ALL are legitimate versions of Scripture just cannot be true. The translations come from different manuscripts, which is the explanation for including/excluding certain passages. They cannot both be right! Either they are supposed to be Scripture or they are not supposed to be in Scripture.Click to expand...
No one here claims that ALL translations are true, and your claim that they are all from different manuscripts is simply false. The NKJV and a couple of lesser known translations are from the same manuscript body. My frustration comes when the NKJV is lumped in with all the critical text versions. This simply is not true.
Page 3 of 6