Featured KJV's Textual Error

Kjv makes it that Peter and Paul was citing the Father as the great God and Jesus the Savior, not that Jesus was both!

 

Think many would be surprised on just how much in agreement the CT/MT/TR texts are to each other!

 

IF one holds to the superority of the TR text, then the Nkjv superior to the Kjv to use!

 

was just answering the question posed back to prove that the NKJV is better then the Kjv!

 

2 peter 1:1

 

Those words are there!

 

Yes but the thought is the same just worded differently. The reason the NKJV is not a revised version of the KJV, they are unaffiliated.The thought that the New King James version is in fact a new version of the KJV is false. They just wanted to sell Bibles so they stole the name. misleading people in to thinking that it is the New King James. In my opinion they are completely different.
MB

 

Nkjv uses same textual sources, just updated grammar and corrected some Kjv mistakes!

 

Of course the NKJV is perfect with out errors. I should have known. Truthfully there is not a perfect version
MB

 

Both places though, the MV correctly translate it as meaning Jesus is both God and savior, while Kjv makes it seem God the Father is God, while Jesus is Savior!

 

I was quoting off memory, shows not what it used to be!

 

I realize you were speaking to someone else in this quote, but I just tried yesterday to help keep your thread from turning into in a KJO vs MV by showing that the topic was about a supposed KJB error.
You’ve made it obvious though here the intent behind your post.

 

That it’s more about attacking those who hold to the KJB than just reviewing a supposed textual error in it.
I don’t mean to rude but that should have been obvious given what I quoted from you.

 

Kjvo have think skins, as they blast off on the "corrupted" MV, and yet when all we do is point out that the Kjv as mistakes in it, that the TR is not perfect, seen as "attacking and putting down: the Kjv!