Message to self described Christians who vote as democrats

David Duke is a red Herring.
He only won one election. It was in a unique district, to say the least. He was never accepted by The GOP or it's leaders. Byrd was a leader of the Democratic party on a national level and was fully embraced by the party. The Democrats gave Trump literal hell because he did not denounce Duke. Trump said he was not familiar enough with Duke to form an opinion on him. He later denounced him. I had the same opinion of Duke at the time the question was asked. I had no idea the man was alive or what he believed then. He could have been the NAACP chairman by then for all I knew. Trump thinks like I do. If someone asks you a question that seems to have an obvious answer, don't answer it until you research it. It's usually a trap. That's how he saw the Duke question.

 

Yes, because Trump did not want to denounce white supremacy.

Which was either a lie or a sign of a major neurological issue.

Yes, because he clearly was pressured to do it. By delaying condemnation, he sent the message that he was okay with them and denouncing them just for show.

You just be quite young. David Duke has been in the headlines since the early 1990s when he ran for Governor of Louisiana. Republicans denounced him then, including George H. W. Bush.

No, unless he has had a major neurological issue, he knew exactly who Duke is. He denounced him many years ago. For instance, he is an interview from February 14, 2000 with Matt Lauer:

In reference to the Reform Party, Trump said:

Well, you've got David Duke just joined -- a bigot, a racist, a problem. I mean, this is not exactly the people you want in your party.

The video and transcript of the interview is at this link:
Transcript Quote - Interview: Matt Lauer Interviews Donald Trump on NBC's Today Show - February 14, 2000 | Factbase

So which is it? Was Trump lying or does he have a terrible memory (while claiming to have an astounding memory) and forgets who major media figures are?

 

You are missing the entire point. Both Trump and I knew who Duke was in the 90s. Neither he nor I was familiar who Duke was in 2016. For all I knew and for all Trump knew, he could have completely changed. As you point out with Byrd, people can change. Trump thought he was getting trapped into denouncing a changed person. It could have been a Johnny Lee Clary type situation. The interview you cite was 15 years old at time question was asked.
You deceptively omit text in your selective quoting. The word "then" was important.

 

I did too. I didn’t forget either.

If his team didn’t inform he, he could have simply asked, “Is David Duke still with the KKK? Or advocate white supremacy? If so, I don’t want that endorsement.”

How do you know Trump’s thoughts? Why do you assume that a person has fundamentally changed their character?

David Duke had regularly been in the news during that 15 years.

I did not do anything deceptively. I don’t even know what “then” you are referring to. I have provided the ENTIRE context of the interview WITH video of the interview for your reference.

I’ve made my point. I didn’t actually expect for you to acknowledge that I had demonstrated that the people you don’t like are not uniformly evil, nor that Donald Trump regularly lies.

 

I had not heard a peep out of Duke since his Presidential primary run against Bush. If you regularly saw him in the news, you were watching different news than me.

 

B.B. If the Democrats willingly take ANTIFA support and votes, who the heck are they to condemn anyone.
Any Democrats denouncing ANTIFA?

 

The inconsistencies of society and continued suffering of great groups of people
have gained more importance than the killing of the preborn.

 

Last I checked, Republicans were the party that denied systemic racism. Hmmm...

 

That's because there is no systemic racism in this country.

 

But only one side is reality.

 

They want to now deprogram us of from the cult of trump, sounds like what they do in North Korea!

 

That would be due to there not being any such thing!

 

many of us would have accepted Him with open arms though!

 

Not quite sure what "systemic racism" is unless it a way to absolve some of guilt.
Is it a way to say that racism does not exist in our country and it's just a group of whiney folks' sour grapes?

I would ask you to even consider what it is like to be a person of color in this country.

John Griffith Howard wrote a book, published in the early 1960's, titled Black Like Me.
He was a white man who dyed his skin black and lived with black skin for several months.
The book is a chronicle of his experiences.

A film was even made of it with James Whitmore as Howard.
Here is a short video about it (11:17) from youtube.



Oh, SGO, 1960's?
That's ancient history.
It's not like that anymore.

Really?

 

That's right, nothing at all has changed since the Civil Rights Acts. But I'll give you this much. The Dems have always been vicious racists. The Dems, with Biden in the lead, hated Clarence Thomas because he was black. The Dems hated his blackness so much that they borked him, albeit unsuccessfully. The Dems have always been vicious racists. I'll give you that much.

 

[QUOTE="RighteousnessTemperance&, post: 2672680, member: 13823]

"That's right, nothing at all has changed since the Civil Rights Acts."

But I'll give you this much. The Dems have always been vicious racists. The Dems, with Biden in the lead, hated Clarence Thomas because he was black. The Dems hated his blackness so much that they borked him, albeit unsuccessfully. The Dems have always been vicious racists. I'll give you that much.[/QUOTE]


Great first statement.

I would think those on the forum now who are Democrats would be indignant for being referred to as racist.

Then there are no prejudiced people on Baptist Board?
I am somewhat and it stinks.

Also there is theological and doctrinal prejudice which I would hope most here can admit to having, along with just a little pride.

Runs deep.

 

That was a most confused reply. What runs deep is the hypocrisy of Dems trying to paint others as racist. But you seem to want to have the conversation they cannot afford. Applying the same standards across the board is anathema to them, for they fail miserably, far more so than those they accuse.

But to repeat an all important point, I generally do not refer to the commoner as a Dem or a Rep. Those terms are reserved for those with the power that goes with them. Voting a certain way does not count. However, those wishing to be numbered with the hypocrites are welcome, and at any rate cannot be stopped by such as I.

 

Hey sorry to confuse you.

Is not this the thread title?:

"Message to self described Christians who vote as democrats"

The above is a general statement.
This line is not in the title: "I generally do not refer to the commoner as a Dem or a Rep."

Forgive me if I thought it meant to be referring to some of the people on this forum.

Doesn't also go to describing some groups as "Un-American?"

No Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male or female, and to me implied: no person of a particular color or doctrinal bias in Christ.
Galatians 3:28

 

I cannot say none here conflate the two, only that I generally don't, because I think it unfair, as their mere voters likely don't bother to think much, thus fail to discern just how devious are those serpents they favor. The latter think like the devil, and speak his language fluently.

Given how little regard the Dems have for the Constitution and the basic rights it recognizes, they easily qualify as anti-America. The Progressive Left Dems are instead pro-USSA, that is, are hellbent on creating the Union of Socialist States of America, and may yet succeed.