That is a good case for switching to Obama-Biden if I ever saw one.
That will teach Romney he should have been 100% life.
That is a ridiculous conclusion.
99 percent is better than zero.
First, I've never seen where Romney claimed to be 100% anti-abortion. I've seen many reports where democrats claimed he was 100% anti-abortion, and the response from his campaign has always included the exclusions for rape and life of the mother. The democrats push the 100% thing to get the "women's rights" vote, knowing full well it has never been Romney's position.
Second, if I were to change my vote to Obama just to show Romney that he should have been 100%, then I've changed my vote to 100% support of abortions for any reason. So I've gone from "let's stop 99% of abortions" to "let's support 100% of abortions", just because we want 1% more?
I'm with Salty on this one. But my next step is: who are we presenting (and voting) for president for 2016?
My post was to point out the ridiculous conclusion.
I completely agree about your 2016 statement.
November 7 is the time to start working for a conservative nominee in 2016, not during the primary season of 2016.
By then it is too late.
We have made this mistake for the last several election cycles.
From the tone of the comments, I think most believe down deep that Obama is going to pull this out by the smallest of margins.
Romney has never advocated the murder of babies alive after an abortion Crabby. So you have nothing to crow about.
You should get on your knees and ask God to forgive your unabashed support for the abortionist in chief. Much of the recent democrat convention was given over to the celebration of the death of the unborn.
This was much like one would expect at a pagan celebration.
I believe that Islam is a religion of death.
I suspect that Qbama's Islamic roots are much deeper than he admits.
He not only wants to murder babies but insists on pulling the trigger on the Drone kills.
Huff Post hit piece.
Not surprising - intended to deflect any votes for Romney to Obama, the murderer-in-chief.
Sorry some of you are taking the bait.
Sad.
Even if Romney were pro abortion, which he is not, how does that justify a vote for Obama?
Romney has said he is pro life.
If he wins and it turns out to be an election ploy, he will be held accountable.
And we know that Obamma is viciously pro abortion as are most of the leaders in the democrat party.
And they want the taxpayer to fund abortions.
We are through Planned Parenthood.
I would suggest that the belivers stand on the prinicples of Christ which would be no abortion. That means we cannot stand with anyone who is pro abortion. Evil never fixes evil. I do not believe that any honest believer can say that the Lord is leading them to vote pro abortion. So there is no one to vote for in this election.
This is where the so-called "Pro Life" crowd loses all credibility. By not caring about a mother's health, they condemn women with ectopic pregnancies to die needlessly, even though the zygote will perish regardless.
Zygote? Zygote? What is a Zygote.
A baby is a baby! is a baby! is a baby!
I am not so sure about all those who call themselves humans?
I am not sure about Judith but most prolife folks would not have the child be the killer of its mother.
I believe that is the position of the Roman Catholic Communion.
I suspect that is the position of most who are prolife.
Rape and incest are no excuse for the slaughter of the innocent child; perhaps the rapist.
That being said there is no excuse for a "Christian", that includes you MP and CTB, supporting the rabid abortionist-in-chief, Barry Obamma!