New climate study deals blow to skeptics

It isn't the liberals who want to turn food into gasoline.

 

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

 

Liberals have killed about 800,000 people a year since DDT was banned. Of course, those dead folk are black Africans, and we see how blacks were treated in the democrat states of the south, so it's not surprising they put birds ahead of them.

Havensdad is 100% correct. Weepy secularists only seem to be able to memorize 3 or 4 verses, and can never put it in context. Those who lean to their own understanding will never fully grasp the gospel.

 

Is it even possible for you to tell the truth, or are you pathologically opposed to the truth?

DDT was banned in the United States in 1972 when Richard Nixon was president.

 

Like many connies, Curtis has a truth allergy.

 

Also, when you see liberal policies fail & do damage, like destroying the Chesapeake Bay with run-off from farms only used to produce corn ethonol, (not to mention the folks rioting & starving to death in some less agricultuarally blessed nations because they can't afford corn), they double down on it. They are not interested in results. They only care about power. Dead people mean only statistics to them.

Disgusting.

 

Most environmental concerns affect public health. Part of protecting public health involves ensuring we have safe air, water, etc. Environmental concerns are one area where the far-right offers no solutions.

 

Damn the earth= Damn many people in industrial areas to die of respiratory diseases because of air pollution.

Damn the earth= Damn people to starvation when the crops won't grow.

Damn the earth= Damn people to unclean drinking water and unsafe food.

 

Right, if it wasn't for "liberals" there would be no ethanol made from corn.

 

I am assuming "connies" means conservatives? I am about as conservative (poltically) as one can get, yet I have a concern for the environment. Fossil fuels are the main source for the forseeable future, but I do hope we can find ways to either mitigate any potential effects and/or transition to cleaner and perhaps more abundant energy sources. Even more than "environmental concerns", I would like to see us (USA) free of the need for dependence on outside energy supplies and enriching nations who have little to no regard for us.

 

Fowler, who referred to the report as another in a series of "wake-up calls," is encouraged by the leadership thus-far shown by Obama and governors Martin O'Malley (D) and Tim Kaine (D) of Virginia, but stressed political promises must translate into policy changes....



http://ww2.somdnews.com/stories/07102009/rectop152727_32183.shtml

 

Sorry, ignore-list bound libbies, but I have an earth to subdue. Time to put some fear & dread in the plants & animals.

I wish you luck in making earth a better place to go to Hell from.

 

These international thinkers and talkers aren't going to be satisfied until we're all paying a carbon tax. A global carbon tax. To an unelected unaccountable global elite who think it's their birthright to rule over us and use our money to enslave us all.

If Thomas Jefferson were here today he'd be busy writting our declaration of independence from the "international community". And no doubt the corporate mainstream media would be making him out to be some kind of radical extremist.

 

Curtis would simply put Jefferson on the ignore list. :laugh:

 

I'm sure alot of folks here would.

 

I'm no tree-hugger by any stretch, but I agree wholeheartedly with this.

 

Jefferson would be too busy cutting up Bibles, taking out references to the divinity of Christ, the virgin birth, the miracles and the resurrection. After all, there are numerous translations nowadays, not just the KJV that he could butcher to fit his un-Christian belief system.