My point exactly. This diversion had no point in this thread. My previous post made it clear how I feel about the Economic Times article.
BY the way The Economic Times was not a generic term - it is the source of the article quoted in the OP.
The Economic Times is a widely read economic magazine published in India. It is not a sensationalist periodical. I do not know where they picked up the story. It has also been published in several UK newspapers that are also highly regarded.
Isn't it interesting the way they keep hammering at Palin?
Their candidate won, so why all the focus on Palin?
I think it's to throw off suspicion because there are SO MANY unanswered questions about Obama.
It's just a tactic to distract us so we don't question bho's qualifications.
Criticize but don't lie about her!.
Bush's presidency was destroyed by the lies of the leftist democrats and leftist media.
Unfortunately he did not refute these lies.
I criticize Obama but no one can show where I lied about him.
You mean like when posted totally false and unsubstanciated claims that John McCain was responsible for the fire on the USS Forrestal? Or how about when you bore false witness against your conservative brothers and sisters in Christ basically claiming that they hate the lost so much so that they refuse to invite them to church? Would you now like retract those statements?
Well Obama has told us time and again what he intends to do.
Given his remarks to the Sodom by the Sea elites during the primary campaign he may first go after guns and the Bible!
He signed legislation banning partial birth abortions, he stopped embryonic stem cell research, and he appointed two Supreme Court Justices who hold to an originalist position regarding the interpretation of the Constitution (meaning no legislation from the bench).
How's that for a start?
Wait don't answer this.
You are driving the thread off top by diverting attention onto President Bush.
Stay on topic please.