As usual, your arguments defy logic.i support divine healing - why not - there is no satanic healing is there?
Paul was a special case.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
As usual, your arguments defy logic.i support divine healing - why not - there is no satanic healing is there?
Paul was a special case.
thank youAs usual, your arguments defy logic.
there is no satanic healing is there?

oh thanks for that reminder;Maybe ...
[Matthew 7:22-23 NASB] "Many will say to Me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?' "And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.'![]()
So do I.oh thanks for that reminder;
ok i only believe in DIVINE healing.
Paul had a medical condition God chose not to heal!Do you contend Paul had eye problems? Most who argue against divine healing, as part of their case, contend Paul had an eye ailment.
If that is the route you want to take, then you cant hold unhealed medical condition against Smith Wigglesworth or anyone else.Paul had a medical condition God chose not to heal!
I can though, as unlike Paul accepting the will of God not to heal him, they kept on declaring that God gifted them to be able to heal, healing was provided for in the atonement, so physician, heal thy self!If that is the route you want to take, then you cant hold unhealed medical condition against Smith Wigglesworth or anyone else.
Same has to be said about Paul. Anything less is pure hypocrisy.I can though, as unlike Paul accepting the will of God not to heal him, they kept on declaring that God gifted them to be able to heal, healing was provided for in the atonement, so physician, heal thy self!
Paul knew though that it was not the will, of god to always heal, but those so called faith healers cliam healing provided for in the atonement, so always will of god to heal, just a lack of faith going on!Same has to be said about Paul. Anything less is pure hypocrisy.
i support divine healing - why not - there is no satanic healing is there?
Paul was a special case.
i pray for healing and have had it on occasion.
then if healing does not come i will go to the Dr to relieve the symptoms.
The big difference is that its God Himself choosing to heal, not someone gifted now like an Apostle to heal, and we cannot say healing is provided for int he atonement as WoF does, as in their minds, God always must heal if we confess and believe enough!Yes there is. That's why pagan temples used to have healing rooms.
Nothing wrong with doing that, see James, but is big problem when we demand and expect God to always have to heal us....i pray for healing and have had it on occasion.
then if healing does not come i will go to the Dr to relieve the symptoms.
Does that mean we missed the Second Coming?Speaking of which, Jack van Impe died a week or so ago, but he had predicted for years that God had promised he would live until Jesus returned.

Well, some deluded folks claim Trump is the Antichrist!Does that mean we missed the Second Coming?
(I hate it when that happens).![]()