I am wondering how the TULIP believing crowd balances preordination with freedom of choice as a believer. Or doesn't it allow for freewill at all.
Do you guys preach a balance of some sort or are all believers just like puppets on a string having no freewill at all to do as they personally see fit to do something as in something for the Lord?
(I'm answering as a TU-IP)
Technically, Belief in the Tulip could be limited to soteriology...that is, one could hold to tulip and believe that people make free choices, but that each of us has chosen sin and is so innately sinful that we would not choose God unless he irrestably calls some. One could believe that and also believe that other than our sinfulness keeping us from choosing God on our own unless he chooses us, We are completely free in all of our decisions, not foreordained by God at all to any of them, good or bad.
I think most Cals would not take that path, though; since they would see it as unbiblical. Some would say that we can't really understand how God's soveriegnty works with our choices. Some would say that we do exactly what we want to do, but that ultimately God is the one guiding our desires. I have not problem with either of these explainations.
The problem with talking about a "balance" is someone might end up saying God is "mostly" sovereign and we have "mostly" free will.
Most calls would reject the idea of totally free wills in humans. Many will say that nothing happens unless God Causes it to happen. Others would say nothing happens unless God EITHER causes it or ALLOWS it, and that it is somehow part of his over-arching plan. We would point to the verse in Acts that say the people who crucified Jesus did what God had predestined to take place...and yet God still held them responsible for thier actions.
The Bible says God chose me, and says that I must choose him. So I believe both of those.