Non-baptists got into a discussion in the baptist-only area, so moving it here.
Originally posted by Warren
Bob,
First, just because someone doesn't attend a church with the name "Baptist" on the church sign out front doesn't mean he is baptistic. I embrace baptistic standards. Prophecy is debateable, and baptists vary on their position; it is not a "fundamental" in the sense of detrmining if one is a true Christian. Further, the church I attend is "baptistic" in every sense. I have given serious consideration to the possibility of attending the local Independent Baptist church, but I don't think my wife and girls could wear those silly long blue jean skirts they always wear.
Bob, I e-mailed you offline about "this generation" first, and you were unwilling to engage me directly. It seems you would rather post these general, no-exegesis remarks about non-fulfillment, with no expositional proof or regard for time statements.
You asked me to PROVE that "this generation" referred to the contemporary generation of Jesus' day. I did that with clear references from the gospels and an appeal to CONSISTENCY. Your reply? All you can say is "it hasn't happened". So it is YOU who can prove nothing. It is you who has the wrong definition of "this generation"....and I'm sure you know that.
Lastly, you said that "some" of the Olivet Discourse was fulfilled in the first century generation "this generation"). But how do you handle what I call the "all" verses??? Lk.21:22 and 21:32 both say that ALL would be fulfilled before that generation had passed. Not some, but ALL. All included everything Jesus talked about previous to verse 32. Verse 22 says that 70 A.D. was the fulfillment of "all things that were written". So it was ALL or nothing. You do not have the right - out of ignorance - to chop up the Lord's Olivet Discourse the way you do. The discourse was NOT a near-far prophecy!