I just have to put my two-cents into thread.
I agree with Ed. These are "loaded" questions and loaded questions require explanations for answers rather than a simple "yes" and "no". This sounds like a cross-examining attorney who isn't bright enough to realize the jury can see right through his attack on the witness.
Let me ask you to answer the following questions about my position:
1. How many people am I leading to Hell because I believe the AV1611 is infallible?
Assumes that that you ACTUALLY HAVE a copy of the AV1611. My guess is that you really have a 1769 maybe Cambridge? Or, I think there was another revision in the 1800s and then there is the modern revision called the NKJV. So, in that context, you will not be leading anybody to hell, but you will not be leading many to Jesus since most people can't read the 1611 very well.
By the way, your question is also loaded because you do not lead people to "hell". That is their destination from birth (accountability) until they accept Jesus (if they do).
2. How many young Christians will grow up with a stunted knowledge of the Bible, if I teach them to read it with the belief it is infallible and the very words of God?
Well, first of all you will probably have to buy them some copies of the AV1611 because you don't find them at Wal-Mart. Then you will have to teach them how to read the 1611 version of English.
3. What is wrong with holding up the AV1611 and telling Bible-believing Christians, "You can trust every word"?
If it is an original printing, no it is not wrong, but you probably need to arm yourself or have a bodyguard nearby because you will no doubt be robbed at gunpoint holding such a valuable Bible out in public. That is the reason most AV1611's are kept locked up.
If it is a new "printing" of the AV1611, then there is nothing wrong with it, but like it was mentioned above, you might get tired. But, You can assure yourself that you are holding God's Words. No argument there.
4. How much of my reward will I lose for trusting God to keep his "WORDS" to every generation?
You will only get rewards for those things you do for the advancement of God's Kingdom. If you are adhering to the doctrine that the King James Version 1611 is the ONLY copy of God's Word, then I don't imagine any awards are forth-coming. In fact, if you tell someone to quit reading their NASB and they do, then you might be held responsible for that.
5. If I am not allowed to believe the AV1611 is infallible, then which version should hold that distinction?
Would you like a list? If you so prefer the non-Alexandrian type form then my advice would be either a Cambridge KJV or a NKJV.
Otherwise, you can tell them NIV, NASB, ASV, ESV and a several others.
If they REALLY like the style of English in the AV1611 instead of the more modern KJV, then I suggest you also let them in on the Geneva Bible and the Bishop's Bible.
These all contain the infallable Word of God.
Oh, and you can hold out many other translations in many other languages, too. I don't want to limit you.
6. If no version can hold that distinction, what do you suggest I tell my grand-children the next time they read Psalm 12:6-7?
I would assume that this is what you will say (please excuse me if I get some of the letters wrong, they are extremely hard to read in the olde print:
"6. The wordes of the L O R D are pure wordes fituer trieb in a fornare of earth purifieb feuen times. 7. Thou flalt keepe them, (O L O R D,)thou fhalt preferue *them from this generation foreuer."
Column note were star is: (This is HARD to read):
Hebr,the vilest of the foumes of men are exalted."
You would read all of that above because that note in the column is referenced in my AV1611. Or you could just read the verses. You might want to also read the introduction to the chapter to your grandkids:
"Pfalmes. on the wicked. ---
David deftitute of humane comfort, craueth helpe of God Hee comforteth himfelfe with Gods judgements on the wicked, and confidence in Gods tried promifes."
They might like that also.
7. If I am forced to learn Hebrew and Greek before I can study the "words" of God, will you pay for our lessons?
It won't do you any good to read Hebrew or Greek for two reasons. a) You wouldn't know for sure which manuscript is closest to the original and b) excellent modern translations can be found to cover either manuscript family you wish anyway. The translations I refer to are good and contain the Word of God.
8. Please tell me why you still "preach from" the AV1611 but do not believe it is infallible?
I don't know ANYBODY HERE that preaches from the AV1611. I know a few that preach from the 1769 and the New KJV. If someone did preach from the AV1611 they probably wouldn't keep their audience very long since most wouldn't be able to understand it.
9. Which Bible do you use in your private studies and which one is the "best translation"?
Certainly not the AV1611. If I choose the TR I would probably read a KJ1769 or an NKJV. If I have no problems about which text form my New Testament came from then I would read a NASB, ESV, etc.
10. Why can't you just leave us "ignorant brethren" alone with our belief in the infallibility of the Scriptures and let us retain the title "Bible-believers", while you could use the title "Bible-correctors and interpreters"?
Because YOU are making a VICTIM of yourself with your whining. You may read whatever Bible you choose. You are the one who posted this on the BBS, I'm just answering. But, your understanding of our position is all tainted. We ARE Bible-Believers, we just do not believe that an AV1611 is the ONLY Word of God. I for one think the King James that is on sale today (probably 1769 or later) is also the Word of God. 
