Ignoring for now your unjustifiable accusations toward others on this board, since you raised the question and now judged, how about explaining why you think this comment by Reagan unequivocally constitutes racism.
Perhaps I might even agree with you, if you can properly lay out the case.
BTW, I recently heard Dobson say a coach criticized his whole team for the way they were acting toward some girls.
The specific term used wasn’t “monkeys” but “chimpanzees.”
Would that change be enough to keep the coach or Reagan safe from a racism charge?
Yes, but there is NO right to have the Church accept their sinful lifestyles as being somehow not permitted and sanctioned by God! That active and practicing lifedtyle still Abomination in eyes of God!
The Constitution does not give that tight. SCOTUS bastardazation gave that right.
Homosexuality was illegal in all the States when and after ratification of the Bill of Rights. Was illegal in most States until 2980s. The the courts changed the Constitution.
Smoking, drinking, over eating, and spending time in the sun have health risks. Homosexuality just as promiscuous heterosexuality have health risks. Both were illegal and should still be.
Incest affects the innocent. That's why it's different. What consenting adults do with their bodies and orifices should be down to them and not the government
Just a question, did God have the right to demand that His people not be into lesbian/homesexual lifestyles, active participating, and that the death penalty was issued to those caught in those acts? For the Christian, what is the ulimaye authority, US Constitution or the scriptures?