-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Reasons to Leave My NASB95
- Thread starter TCGreek
- Start date
Ed Edwards
<img src=/Ed.gif>
Brother Trotter:
I'm thinking 'T' is evil :saint:
It starts out bad words like 'Texas', 'Tenesee', and 'Taxes'.
So anybody's name that has 3 't's in it has to be bad.
I'll check Sister Riplinger's bood IN AWE OF THE WORD (AV Publications Corp, 2003). Ah, here it is on pages 1146-1147
Nah, no way to predict what she is going to say -- this indicates more randomness than the Engineering (planning ahead) that God did.
I'm thinking 'T' is evil :saint:
It starts out bad words like 'Texas', 'Tenesee', and 'Taxes'.
So anybody's name that has 3 't's in it has to be bad.
I'll check Sister Riplinger's bood IN AWE OF THE WORD (AV Publications Corp, 2003). Ah, here it is on pages 1146-1147
Nah, no way to predict what she is going to say -- this indicates more randomness than the Engineering (planning ahead) that God did.
You're spreading poisonous slander, Ehud.
What a terrible thing to say about a fellow Christian.
The false statements against these men are so easily refuted.
All one needs do is read their works.
"...people like Charles Spurgeon and Dean Burgon, who were comtemporaries with Westcott and Hort and knew them personally, never made such claims against their character and beliefs, even when vocally disagreeing with some of their approaches to textual criticism.
Burgon and Spurgeon never called them heretics, never questioned or challenged their Christian faith, never challenged or questioned their doctrinal statements, never accused them of involvement or of condoning of occultic or New Age practices or beliefs..."
Westcott and Hort Resource Centre [LINK]
Rob
What a terrible thing to say about a fellow Christian.
The false statements against these men are so easily refuted.
All one needs do is read their works.
"...people like Charles Spurgeon and Dean Burgon, who were comtemporaries with Westcott and Hort and knew them personally, never made such claims against their character and beliefs, even when vocally disagreeing with some of their approaches to textual criticism.
Burgon and Spurgeon never called them heretics, never questioned or challenged their Christian faith, never challenged or questioned their doctrinal statements, never accused them of involvement or of condoning of occultic or New Age practices or beliefs..."
Westcott and Hort Resource Centre [LINK]
Rob
Last edited by a moderator:
Westcott and Hort Christians????
“MODERN TEXTUAL CRITICISM IS PSYCHOLOGICALLY ‘ADDICTED’ TO WESTCOTT AND HORT. Westcott and Hort, in turn, were rationalists in their approach to the textual problem in the New Testament and employed techniques within which rationalism and every other kind of bias are free to operate. The result of it all is a methodological quagmire where objective controls on the conclusions of critics are nearly nonexistent. It goes without saying that no Bible-believing Christian who is willing to extend the implications of his faith to textual matters can have the slightest grounds for confidence in contemporary critical texts” (emphasis added) (Zane C. Hodges, “Rationalism and Contemporary New Testament Textual Criticism,” Bibliotheca Sacra, January 1971, p. 35).
“THE DEAD HAND OF FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT LIES HEAVY UPON US. In the early years of this century Kirsopp Lake described Hort’s work as a failure, though a glorious one. But HORT DID NOT FAIL TO REACH HIS MAJOR GOAL. HE DETHRONED THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS. ... Hort’s success in this task and the cogency of his tightly reasoned theory shaped—AND STILL SHAPES—the thinking of those who approach the textual criticism of the NT through the English language” (emphasis added) (Ernest Cadman Colwell, “Scribal Habits in Early Papyri: A Study in the Corruption of the Text,” The Bible in Modern Scholarship, ed. J.P. Hyatt, New York: Abingdon Press, 1965, p. 370).
Sounds like a wonderful, loving, trying to find the truth Christian to me:smilewinkgrin:
Spurgeon, Burgeon were they Brothers:applause:
Ehud
Which one NIV, NASB,NARSV. If they were such great Christians why did they use two [attack on Bible manuscripts deleted] manuscripts.
“MODERN TEXTUAL CRITICISM IS PSYCHOLOGICALLY ‘ADDICTED’ TO WESTCOTT AND HORT. Westcott and Hort, in turn, were rationalists in their approach to the textual problem in the New Testament and employed techniques within which rationalism and every other kind of bias are free to operate. The result of it all is a methodological quagmire where objective controls on the conclusions of critics are nearly nonexistent. It goes without saying that no Bible-believing Christian who is willing to extend the implications of his faith to textual matters can have the slightest grounds for confidence in contemporary critical texts” (emphasis added) (Zane C. Hodges, “Rationalism and Contemporary New Testament Textual Criticism,” Bibliotheca Sacra, January 1971, p. 35).
“THE DEAD HAND OF FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT LIES HEAVY UPON US. In the early years of this century Kirsopp Lake described Hort’s work as a failure, though a glorious one. But HORT DID NOT FAIL TO REACH HIS MAJOR GOAL. HE DETHRONED THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS. ... Hort’s success in this task and the cogency of his tightly reasoned theory shaped—AND STILL SHAPES—the thinking of those who approach the textual criticism of the NT through the English language” (emphasis added) (Ernest Cadman Colwell, “Scribal Habits in Early Papyri: A Study in the Corruption of the Text,” The Bible in Modern Scholarship, ed. J.P. Hyatt, New York: Abingdon Press, 1965, p. 370).
Sounds like a wonderful, loving, trying to find the truth Christian to me:smilewinkgrin:
SO WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Spurgeon, Burgeon were they Brothers:applause:
Ehud
Last edited by a moderator:
NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
Ehud,
Please source your quotes so they don't have to be deleted
Please source your quotes so they don't have to be deleted
Whhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhat!!!!!!!
Helloooooooooo the source is listed after each quote.:BangHead:
(Zane C. Hodges, “Rationalism and Contemporary New Testament Textual Criticism,” Bibliotheca Sacra, January 1971, p. 35).
(Ernest Cadman Colwell, “Scribal Habits in Early Papyri: A Study in the Corruption of the Text,” The Bible in Modern Scholarship, ed. J.P. Hyatt, New York: Abingdon Press, 1965, p. 370).
what sources were you looking for???????????????
Ehud & Co. Defenders of the truth.:applause:
Please read the quote and it's source C4k
Helloooooooooo the source is listed after each quote.:BangHead:
(Zane C. Hodges, “Rationalism and Contemporary New Testament Textual Criticism,” Bibliotheca Sacra, January 1971, p. 35).
(Ernest Cadman Colwell, “Scribal Habits in Early Papyri: A Study in the Corruption of the Text,” The Bible in Modern Scholarship, ed. J.P. Hyatt, New York: Abingdon Press, 1965, p. 370).
what sources were you looking for???????????????
Ehud & Co. Defenders of the truth.:applause:
Ed Edwards
<img src=/Ed.gif>
Palatka51 said:
Did you notice how the 'd' is very much like a mirror image of the '6' - not only it as a '666' but it is a mirror image of the '666': 'ddd' :tonofbricks:
The first article quoted by Ehud is from Chick Publications [LINK]
Were the quotes you posted next cut and pasted from Way of Life [LINK]?
Their copyright reads:
Rob
Were the quotes you posted next cut and pasted from Way of Life [LINK]?
Their copyright reads:
Rob
NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
Ehud said:
You are correct. Apologies. I appreciate your diligence in digging through those sources to find these quotes. It is interesting that you and Brother Cloud both found the same information. Great minds think alike!
I did however delete your quote from Chick Publications since you did not source it.
Last edited by a moderator: