...........
Sorcery sells, and the young are buying
Discussion in 'Polls Forum' started by Rufus_1611, Jun 12, 2007.
?
-
Unfit for Christians
18 vote(s)56.3% -
Just fiction and harmless
12 vote(s)37.5% -
Other
2 vote(s)6.3%
Page 1 of 3
-
-
See also:
http://cana.userworld.com/cana_harrypotter.html
[This link contains other Harry Potter-related, etc., articles as well.]
www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/harrypotter.html
[This link's home page will direct you to many other helpful resources that deal w/ other contemporary issues.] -
I tried to say on here a lng time ago that Harry Potter was socery/ witchcraft and not fit for christians. No one agreed with me, everyone thought it was just fiction and harmless.
-
Baptist Believer Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I ask, because that's one of the highly questionable "quotes" tossed around by those who wish to merge church and state. David Barton has used it, but I think even he has backed away from it.
Furthermore, I'm not sure if the statement is true, even if Abe Lincoln's name is not attached to it to give it credibility. The assumption is that people hear and act on things uncritically, believing everything that they're told so that, in the later years of their lives, will rule the nation according to the propaganda they heard when they were children.
That's just not true for most people.
What ended in 1962 and 1963 was the government promotion of a civil religion, very loosely based on broad-minded Christianity, in an environment where students were forced to attend and urged by authority figures to participate. Historically, Baptists have always opposed that sort of behavior and have paid for their dissent by public beatings, imprisonment, fines, scorn and sometimes death.
Thank God that the official promotion of civil religion ended in many classrooms in the early 1960s! I pray that Baptists today would not betray their own heritage by demanding something that our ancestors wisely rejected. -
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
Art imitates life, not the other way around. People would fantasize about magic powers & sorcery with or without Harry Potter. In fact, Harry Potter is a RESULT of such fantasy, not the cause of it.
And I am not in the habit of letting other Christians tell me what is fit for this Christian. If it's not fit for a Christian, then it ain't fit for anyone.
I have not read any Harry Potter, or Tolkien, either. I like Stephen King, -
http://www.google.com/search?q=abra...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Abraham.Lincoln.Quote.4147
http://www.funnyreign.com/quotes-abrahamlincoln.shtml
I don't know where and when he said it and it's not necessarily too important as the premise is quite true. If you teach children secular humanism in school, then when they get all growed up, they're going to be secular humanists. Since children are not being taught how to think but what to think in schools, then they do not have the means to critically discern and come out from under the government indoctrination.
-
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
1 Corinthians 13;11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
I'm more concerned with the fantasy of evolution being taught as science, than this.
People get awful self-pious when it comes to liesure activities. -
Baptist Believer Well-Known MemberSite SupporterThe first "source" you list is simply a Google search results page for a search of "Abraham Lincoln quotes." That's not a source of any kind!
The next two "sources" claim the quote is true, but cite no references for the quote itself. Did they do a personal interview with Abraham Lincoln?
You offer no evidence except that other people have attributed those words to Lincoln. Unless you learn how to verify assertions presented to you with primary (or at least credible) sources, you are captive to everyone who says things that sound good and support your prejudices.
No wonder so many people are caught up in wild conspiracy theories!
The true and living God has not been "replaced" by Harry Potter in any sense. -
As to the source issue, I'm not getting into quote sources with you anymore. The author in the article quoted Abraham Lincoln, it is a commonly accepted quote. If you have evidence to suggest that it is in error then you provide that evidence rather than spending time on a rabbit trail. If you like, take the quote out of the article and it doesn't change the premise of the article.
"Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American school is a school of humanism. What can a theistic Sunday school's meeting for an hour once a week and teaching only a fraction of the children do to stem the tide of the five-day program of humanistic teaching?" (Charles F. Potter, "Humanism: A New Religion," 1930)
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
If there wasn't Harry Potter, kids would be reading something else besides scripture. The problem there is parents.
Second, which came first, murder as an act, or murder as art ? -
I don't think that it matters which came first. Give kids a book that makes murder look like a fun game, and you will probably end up with some murderers.
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
I disagree. Lots of kids watched Bugs Bunny, and never threw anyone off a cliff, or a tall building, or put a bomb on the F# key on a xylophone. I'm also willing to bet that most folks who watched the Three Stooges never hit anyone with a ball peen hammer.
-
Ok, maybe I was overreaching a bit. Murder and causing physical harm is something that requires a bit more conditioning because as children our parents condition us against those things. When we hit someone or bite someone as a toddler, we get spanked or admonished and we are taught to empathize and think what would we feel if that was done to us. Harry Potter on the other hand does not fall in the same category, because Harry follows the 'white' witch philosophy of 'do what thou wilt (and harm no one)'. So as long as no one gets hurt, whats wrong with a little witchcraft?
-
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
My daughter is 15, now, but even when she was really young, I just never worried about it. As long as she keeps up on her bible lessons, piano lessons, and keeps her grades up and is active in sports, I have to trust she is well-grounded in reality. She has read all the Harry Potter books, and shows no interest in witchcraft. It appears that Harry Potter has not warped her sense of who God is, and what role he plays in her life.
-
Listen, both my schools were 90% Black, and from 6-12th grade we were taught how barbaic, cruel, unjust, selfish, and evil white people were. We were educated to become the next revolutionaries that would overturn this entire nation! Socialism, Communism, Ghandism, etc, all that was shoved down our throats! Guess what? NONE of us believed a bit of it, or at least never took it seriously. We wen't our own way, making our paths in different directions other than what we were taught. If Pan-Africanists aren't any threat, then neither is harry potterists or even secular humanists amoung our teachers.
-
SBCPreacher Active MemberSite Supporter
Two many parents have let down their guard when it comes to their kids. In fact, I think that there are many kids that God is raising all by Himself - with no help from the parents. -
Everyone focuses upon the sorcery aspect, which is bad enough, but by itself could be considered simply fiction and harmless. (Depends upon the person, but still I think it's sufficient for a Christian to avoid.)
But, there's necromancy, charms, spell-casting, moral ambiguity, moral relevance... The list is long, and I think the last two that I listed are bigger proglems than the others but will contribute to a greater acceptance to the others. -
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
Again, I respect your tone very much.
I think when my dad wouldn't let me listen to Alice Cooper, or The Rolling Stones, it made my curiosity stronger, and I learned to sneak around him. I also think if we shelter our children too much, when the time comes for them to make a decision about what's best for them, they can't. -
SBCPreacher Active MemberSite Supporter
Again, what someone else chooses is best for their kids, that's up to them. For us, we believe that we had no other choice.
Page 1 of 3