Driving on my way to work yesterday, I turned on the radio and got Dr. Stanley.
He just started preaching and he was talking about God predestinating people unto the image of Christ and choosing them for salvation and how God is all sovereign and the sinner cannot do anything with regards to God's choice and so on.
I thought to myself: hey, what's going on here ? Chuck Stanley suddenly talking like John Mc'Arthur ? This is interesting.
He went on for three minutes about predestination and election and I couldn't agree with him more on how he viewed these things and presented them.
And then he came on the fork of God's sovereignty and man's responsibility, and he took the wrong fork.
I switched the radio to my other favorite station where they sang oldies but goodies, and enjoyed the Carpenters and the Mamas and the Papas and Peter, Paul and Mary.......
The Gospel: God Centered, Free, Powerful
Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Dale-c, May 19, 2008.
Page 3 of 5
-
pinoybaptist Active MemberSite Supporter
-
And, of course, you can reject all of this by rejecting Jesus.
skypair -
He may be like Norman Geisler who wrote Chosen But Free who tries too hard to reconcile the disparate tenets of Calvinism and free will. The problem for both IMO is that they don't go back to the "fork," as you say, where men were actually making up words and doctrines and correcting those premises.
skypair -
1. Foreknowledge
2. Predestination
3. Calling
4. Justification
5. Sanctification
These things are inseparable. -
Okay, I read this thread and I am confused. Does election/predestination mean that someone can accept Jesus and think they are saved, but if they are not of the elect, they aren't going to heaven?
-
-
God has not and will not ever turn away those who call on Him for mercy.
If you have called on Him for mercy then you are one of the elect. -
-
Just saying "to adoption" is future tense. I guess I should have made it a little more clear. -
A Calvinist will tell you that God only elected some for heaven before time began. -
-
Did the first Adams sin affect everyone?
In the same respect, the second Adams work CAN affect everyone. I did not say will...
It's amazing how base things can confound the wise? -
The second Adam's ( Christ's) work affects His elect ones alone.Romans 5:17b: how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ. ( NIV )
Only some are given grace. Only some are given life(v.18). Only some will be made righteous(v.19).
The same applies to 1 Corinthians 15. only some will be made alive (v.22). Only some will be raised up when He comes back --- all of His own (v.23). -
Lets look at the text and I want you to answer two things. Who does the choosing and when was the choosing done?
If God's will is that ALL of mankind will be saved, but man's "will" controls who will be saved, It is mans "will" that is god and not our Lords. He who reigns or controls is who is Lord.
These verse on salvation bring no glory to mans will, but show all the power and glory of Gods will. Why do so many want to place mans will over Gods will?
God is God for his "will" reigns.
Thy kingdom come; Thy will be done. -
Dale-c is right. In fact, all the brothers and sisters I know from this board came just that way and only found out they were elect AFTER they started learning Calvinism.
What they are inclined to believe thereafter is: 1) we don't choose God; He chooses us to salvation. 2) The "sinner's prayer" or "walking an aisle" are evidences that one believes the free will notion that we decide to be saved, not God through election. 3) Then they have this "quirky" idea that we are "regenerated" - "born again" - by the Holy Spirit BEFORE we believe or have faith or even "hear" (understand) the word of God.
For these reasons, I refer to their teaching as the "gospel of election" rather than the "gospel of Christ." That is, what matters is whether you are "elect" because the "elect" always irresistibly and effecaciously believe.
skypair -
"How does that work?" You say. God's Spirit (and ours) is a combination of our intellect, our emotions, and our will -- all of which are involved in salvation as I'm sure you will readily admit. The intellect "acknowledges," the emotion "thanks," and the will "glorifies God" per Rom 1:21. Or, in more useful terms, we hear the gospel and, by the "power" of believing the word, we "change our mind" -- or will. This is called repentance. It is worked by God through His WORD received by us, NOT by His Spirit dwelling in us as in regeneration.
In fact, someone commented on my post recently that "filling of the Spirit" = "letting the Spirit dwell in you richly." Well, in the case of salvation, one allows the WORD/Christ to dwell in them richly and he/she repents, is baptized, and receives the gift of the Holy Spirit, Acts 2:38 -- in that order!
skypair -
-
I would encourage you to read Eph. 1 again with the Church in prospect in mind not individual believers. -
Interesting debate, but one thing is being misrepresented:
Free grace does not equal free will teaching. Free grace teachers do NOT teach that sinful human beings can in and of themselves choose to accept God's offer of salvation.
Rather, they teach that God gives everyone that measure of grace necessary to respond positively to the gospel. Only that enabling grace of God makes salvation possible.
The issue is not whether God initiates salvation or whether God enables the sinner to believe. Both Calvinists and free grace teachers agree I believe there.
The issue is does God give that grace to all, or just to a selected few. John 3:16 among others makes it clear that the offer is real to all.
The Bible makes it plain that the correct order is foreknowledge, predestination, callling, justification. (Rom. 8) It also makes clear that what we are predestined to is to be conformed to the image of Christ.
From Genesis to Revelation we DO see God showing grace to selected groups and individuals. If I understand Calvinists correctly, they believe that illustrates limited atonement and God choosing some to love and some to hate.
I read those same passages and see it differently: I see God proving over and over and over again that salvation comes not by being in the "in" crowd, or by doing good works, or by any status producing thing on this earth. It comes by the sheer love and grace of God.
To me, both full Arminians and Calvinists are into works based salvation. Neither theology seems to produce humility (in my extremely limited experience.)
For me, to be an Arminian (unless modified such as free grace/once saved always saved) or a Calvinist one would have delete verses such as John 3:16 from the Bible. -
skypair
Page 3 of 5