Alex Jones interviews The Great Global Warming Swindle's producer Martin Durkin.
Click Here to listen.
"The Great Global Warming Swindle"
Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by 2 Timothy2:1-4, Mar 5, 2007.
Page 4 of 6
-
Beyond a doubt? Who are the authors and what are their credentials. Global warming is a scientific theory. It has yet to be proved conclusively but what would be the dire effects of the U.S. reducing the pollution it dumps into the atmosphere every day? Aren't we responsible for maintaining the purity of the earth which was given us by God? Or should we do whatever we want to trash His creation? -
Ed -
I see this responsce alot from the left. GW is not proven but....... Running around crying out the sky is falling doesnt help your point. It just makes those who support ot look foolish. -
[/quote]Who are the authors and what are their credentials. [/quote]
They are scientists with degrees.
However, the climate change crowd have a definite political agenda and before we rush off and buy into their lines we need to weigh up the consequences and see what really is necessary and what is simple false hoods. -
'The Great Global Warming Swindle', broadcast by Channel 4, put the case for scepticism about man-made climate change. The programme sparked a heated debate and charges of scientific inaccuracy. Here, its director, Martin Durkin, responds to the critics.
Click Here To Continue. -
I almost felt like saying, "Amen" to that article. :) Thanks Poncho.
-
There's more!
GORE FACES HILL GRILLING ON 'WARMING'; QUESTIONS AWAIT FORMER VP
<snip>
Proposed questions for Gore, which are circulating behind-the-scenes, have been obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT -- question that could lead Gore scrambling for answers!
Mr. Gore: You have said several times that we have 10 years to act to stave off global warming. Was that 10 years from the first time you said that or 10 years from now? We just wanted to get a firm date from you that we can hold you to.
Mr. Gore: How can you continue to claim that global warming on Earth is primarily caused by mankind when other planets (Mars, Jupiter and Pluto) with no confirmed life forms and certainly no man-made industrial greenhouse gas emissions also show signs of global warming? Wouldn’t it make more sense that the sun is responsible for warming since it is the common denominator?
Mr. Gore: Joseph Romm, the executive director for the Center for Energy and Climate Solutions, has said we must build 700 large nuclear plants to stave off climate change. Where do you stand on the need for nuclear energy?
Mr. Gore: Do you think the earth is significantly overpopulated and that is a major contributor to your view of climate change. (If yes, what do you think is a sustainable population for the planet?)
Click Here.
I'm really interested in how he'll answer that last question. -
Question Number 2 is very good concerning the Science behind it all.
Question Number 4 is very good as it relates to the Agenda behind it all. -
Regards,
BiR -
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
Well, I, who admittedly not only listens to him, but enjoys him, have never heard him claim to be an expert. To the contrary, he gives credit to the numerous scientists whom he quotes, as evidenced on his website. Unless you can back up your claim, the info on his site trumps your hateful spin.
Your Rush obsession is clouding your judgement. -
Channel 4 to host 'Global Warming Swindle' debate
Click Here For Details. -
Have you ever wondered why Rush is so consumed with the desire to attack global warming on all fronts? It seems a bit odd that he would devote so much time to the subject, especially given the fact that he doesn't think it exists..........
Regards,
BiR -
Which seems to be a diversion from the issue time and time again. Maybe it is a way of having something to say without having something to say. And I have news for you. Rush isn't the only one saying the things he says. But again your obsession with Rush is lockstep with AAR and the likes of Carrvel. I haven't been around as long as some of you but I haven't seen any one say they don't listen to Rush. You are the only Rush obsessed person on the board. However Carrvel is as obsessed with Rush as you are and spouts the same claims you do every time he is on TV. As well as he sticks to non issue claims such as everyone gets it from Rush as you do. Maybe both of you need to get over Rush as he makes little difference in the issues. -
I have just noticed something very odd. There are two individuals whose names keep popping up on this thread about 'Global Warming" more than any others. They happen to be Al Gore and Rush Limbaugh, in alphabetical order. So I decided to do a bit of checking on the scientific credentials of both. And I found out something that I think is very interesting. Neither of the two individuals have any training or history of employment as scientists in any way whatsoever, that I was able to find. One dropped out of college after two years as a speech major; the other started out as an English major, and changed to government, where he graduated and then went to seminary for a brief time. Strangely, both wound up for some time in the field of journalism, hardly a scientific 'venue'. I suggest that the scientific credentials of both individuals are highly suspect, to say the least.
Can anyone besides my own alter-ego, Langauge Cop, spell "A-G-E-N-D-A"? And that in the plural??
Ed -
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
Regards to you as well, I certainly hope you don't take these cyber-whuppin's personally. -
Am I close? I would ask the Language Cop but he is not around at the moment... -
"Actually, it is spelled A-G-E-N-D-A-E. However, the word, 'agenda', is itself a plural noun, the plural of 'agendum'." - Signed, Language Cop
Ed -
Can you put that into context for me.
So, Rush has an agenda, but Rush and the other fellow have agendum? -
I will use a "to-do" list, as the example. The list will have a number of items on it. Each item to be accomplished is an 'agendum' (singular). The list of items (plural), is an 'agenda'. But others have different lists of items. Each one of those lists is also an 'agenda'. When I take more than one list together, I have 'agendae'.
Rush Limbaugh has several things he would like to see happen, and that he works to see accomplished. That collective is his agenda.
Al Gore has several things he would like to see happen, and that he works to see accomplished. That collective is his agenda.
The President of the Czech Republic, Vaclav Klaus, has his own agenda, as well.
Vaclav Klaus and Al Gore have, along with others, presented the agendae to Congress in these hearings that are going on.
Hope that helps.
Ed
Page 4 of 6