There can ONLY be human men! What else are the others, Bigfoots?
Theistic evolution or non-theistic evolution
Discussion in 'Creation vs. Evolution' started by Robert H, Jun 16, 2003.
Page 6 of 6
-
-
-
-
-
The Deity of Jesus is eternal, but his humanity was indeed created, its called the Incarnation!
-
Yeshua1 said: ↑The Deity of Jesus is eternal, but his humanity was indeed created, its called the Incarnation!Click to expand...
Jesus' taking upon Himself the FORM of a Human man, did not MAKE Jesus a HUMAN MAN.
Perhaps you are unaware, that which exists and IS NOT created CAN NOT BECOME CREATED.
Jesus CAN, HAS, DID and WILL appear in the likeness as a HUMAN MAN; However you SHOULD definitively TRUST and KNOW He IS the Lord, ABOVE ALL Lords, WHO speaks and things appear, WHOSE POWER is what effects creations to BE created.
And IF and WHEN YOU accomplish being in the LIKENESS of JESUS; that will not MAKE you God......
any more than JESUS being in the LIKENESS of a HUMAN MAN; makes Him a HUMAN man. -
Happy said: ↑Human men were created.
Jesus' taking upon Himself the FORM of a Human man, did not MAKE Jesus a HUMAN MAN.
Perhaps you are unaware, that which exists and IS NOT created CAN NOT BECOME CREATED.
Jesus CAN, HAS, DID and WILL appear in the likeness as a HUMAN MAN; However you SHOULD definitively TRUST and KNOW He IS the Lord, ABOVE ALL Lords, WHO speaks and things appear, WHOSE POWER is what effects creations to BE created.
And IF and WHEN YOU accomplish being in the LIKENESS of JESUS; that will not MAKE you God......
any more than JESUS being in the LIKENESS of a HUMAN MAN; makes Him a HUMAN man.Click to expand... -
Yeshua1 said: ↑Jesus was born of a woman, as a human, who was also God, so again, to deny His humanity is to commit heresy!Click to expand...
Human men become born of God. Do you think that makes you a god?
What you fail to comprehend is Jesus (NOT SPERM, that enters a woman's Fallopian tubes) had to ENTER Mary's womb, before He could come forth from her womb.
Human men are procreated VIA a human male sperm fertilizing a human female egg IN the females Fallopian tubes. No such things apply to Jesus.
John.1
- [13] Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
-
Gold Dragon Well-Known MemberYeshua1 said: ↑The bible is very clear that Jesus was/is both fully God and fully human, so to deny either aspect woul;d be holding to a heresy!Click to expand...
-
Gold Dragon said: ↑Yes. He advocates docetism which the early church declared heretical in the third century. He believes scripture supports him because of poor hermeneutics.Click to expand...
-
Gold Dragon Well-Known MemberYeshua1 said: ↑To deny Jesus would make him like what JW hold to, as the archangel while on earth, and now a spirit creature!Click to expand...
-
Gold Dragon said: ↑I guess that puts him in a similar category as JWs as having significant problems with their christology. But their error is quite different to Happy's. The JWs believe Jesus is not God. I don't think Happy would go that far. I think he is still Trinitarian. It just his understanding of Jesus' personhood and dual nature that is incorrect, primarily because he has created an artificial distinction between the concepts of man and human, which is an English language phenomenon not found in the Greek.Click to expand...
-
Robert H said: ↑I'm just wondering, is this board mainly to discuss theistic evolution vs creationism, or is it non-theistic evolution? The resaon I ask, is that everyone who posts to these boards, is supposed to give a faith statement. Therefore I can't imagine that any atheists would be hanging out here. Is it fair to say that everyone here who believes in evolution is still a Christian?Click to expand...
-
BobRyan said: ↑Turns out -- there is almost no difference between the two.Click to expand...
Page 6 of 6