• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Theologian N.T. Wright's Reaction to Bin Laden's Death.

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We will never know all the details surrounding the moments of the end of this man's life. Honestly I don't care to know and trust that our leaders made the best decision.

Think of the evil this single man, and his network, brought to the world. This morning as I walked through security at our airport I was reminded of his impact in the world. Last week Financial Times calculated the cost that bin Laden brought to the world...it was something like $2 trillion dollars (after property loss, security measures, war, etc)

When a rogue group of individuals are waging war through less than reputable means they have lost the ability of being given the benefit of the doubt. Any engagement or contact with them is a battle and they are combatants.

While I don't mourn the loss of this man, I also don't celebrate the taking of life. I am ambivalent to the actions but do believe the world is safer than it was two weeks ago.

Well said. :applause:
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
I'm also someone who normally doesn't like killing, but with someone like this, the only language they understand is death, and what else can you really do with them? It's ultimately either you or them. And they obviously have no qualms taking out innocent people in their war against the power structure.
Many Christians used to teach "just pray, and God will protect you, or if he does get you, it was God's will". (Many would teach that to others, but still be willing to protect their own lives!) But for a whole nation of people (Christian and secular alike), you really can't expect them to just let this guy get away with something like that, and it probably isn't worth having him sit in some cell forever, plus all the wrangling in the trial process, plus him being a live martyr.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FR7 Baptist

Active Member
He RESISTED Navy Seals WITHOUT a gun. Really??? :laugh:

I was a Marine for a decade. With no gun he could have easily been captured by a team of SEALS.

OBL did not immediately surrender; he resisted.

Capture him, and do what? Give him to Eric Holder and put him on trial in NY?

In an ideal world, yes.

Scenario: You have a hornet's nest in your house. It is nearby the place your small children play every day.

Do you ask the hornets politely to leave? Do you move, so that the hornets can take over? Or do you take out the hornets?


This isn't rocket science. We killed a potential threat to our nation's women and children. Those who cannot understand that are simply ignorant of facts. I don't care if they are theologians, ukelele players, or if they host a show on MSNBC.

Rbell, you're right. There was no real choice but to kill bin Laden. I've said before, I'm glad he's dead. But I'm not dancing on his grave. It's sad he chose to commit the acts he did instead of doing good things, but it was his own actions that led to his demise.

There are two extremes here- one is "mourning the loss of an image bearer" and the other is dancing in the streets in jubilation. I find it wise to steer clear of both extremes while realizing the world is a safer place without bin Laden.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Let's see, because getting him on trial is going to be hard, just kill him. Trust that thinking doesn't catch on too well.

OBL was a casualty of a war that he and his islamo-thugs started. To kill him was legitimate and, I believe, moral.
 

mandym

New Member
Surely there are a lot more facts than what we are privy to. There is no doubt about that. However, the facts as they are don't spell out a perfectly pretty picture that Christians should be rejoicing over. If we are in this world but not of it, please explain to me the cause for jubilation over the death of this or any other unbelieving man. The Church is presently the biggest stumbling block to Gospel...

First, no the church is not the biggest stumbling block to the gospel. Second, you level an accusation about the "rejoicing" that you cannot know and cannot back up. We can rejoice over justice served without it being over the death itself. We can rejoice that this evil man can no longer do what he has done. Your hypersensitivity is uncalled for.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
That is your option isn't it, hope your thinking doesn't catch on though :thumbsup:

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-George Orwell

I contend that sometimes pragmatism is preferable to idealism when the security of our nation is at stake.
 

PilgrimPastor

Member
Site Supporter
First, no the church is not the biggest stumbling block to the gospel. Second, you level an accusation about the "rejoicing" that you cannot know and cannot back up. We can rejoice over justice served without it being over the death itself. We can rejoice that this evil man can no longer do what he has done. Your hypersensitivity is uncalled for.

The church is a great stumbling block to the Gospel. We are our own worst enemy. I'm not hypersensitive. Revival tarries because we tarry (Leonard Ravenhill). Most American Christians are more focused on matters like this than are on matters of the propagation of the Gospel, which board is serving for fellowship hour next Sunday, or wasting time online as I am right now...

Our collective insensitivity to the level of violence which is carried out in our name in this land in the name of securing peace is equally uncalled for.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rbell

Active Member
So, Pilgrimpastor...we're supposed to object that this mass murderer was killed?

We were supposed to sacrifice more women and children to feel more "righteous?"

That's silly talk.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Capture him, and do what? Give him to Eric Holder and put him on trial in NY?

They could have captured him and let National public radio interview him and they could swoon over his answers...and then NPR could blame the Bush policies for driving him to terrorism.
he could then go on oprah.and dr phil could council him about life...
then He could appear at Joel Osteens church and Joel could smile and say that he is okay,and could have his best life now...if he would just stop with his jihad
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Surely there are a lot more facts than what we are privy to. There is no doubt about that. However, the facts as they are don't spell out a perfectly pretty picture that Christians should be rejoicing over. If we are in this world but not of it, please explain to me the cause for jubilation over the death of this or any other unbelieving man. The Church is presently the biggest stumbling block to Gospel...

Bin laden was an instrument to punish America, for national sin...like the Chaldeans in Habakkuks day,or the Assyrians in Isa 10
5O Assyrian, the rod of mine anger, and the staff in their hand is mine indignation.

6I will send him against an hypocritical nation, and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge, to take the spoil, and to take the prey, and to tread them down like the mire of the streets.

For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwellingplaces that are not their's.

7They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.

8Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.

9They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.

10And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every strong hold; for they shall heap dust, and take it.

11Then shall his mind change, and he shall pass over, and offend, imputing this his power unto his god.

12Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die. O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O mighty God, thou hast established them for correction.

13Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity: wherefore lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, and holdest thy tongue when the wicked devoureth the man that is more righteous than he?
 

jaigner

Active Member
I would also argue that since one of the NPP's foundational proponents is E. P. Saunders who by his own admission is a theological liberal, that alone works to make the case that the NPP itself is left leaning. The hermeneutics involved with the NPP are not conservative by any means and in fact themselves lean left.

N.T. Wright is one of the staunchest and most enthusiastic proponents of historical evangelical Christianity around. A person who argues for the historicity of the virgin birth and the resurrection as Wright does is, by definition, not left-leaning. Perhaps some involved with NPP are, but that could be said of most any perspective.
 

mandym

New Member
N.T. Wright is one of the staunchest and most enthusiastic proponents of historical evangelical Christianity around. A person who argues for the historicity of the virgin birth and the resurrection as Wright does is, by definition, not left-leaning. Perhaps some involved with NPP are, but that could be said of most any perspective.


His view on imputation is left leaning. I believe he has some very solid positions. But some very extreme like imputation. But seeing your thread on "image-bearer" which he has written about it seems you are quite the Wright follower. And the very foundation of the NPP doesn't just lean left it is extremely liberal. Especially coming from men like Dunn.
 

PilgrimPastor

Member
Site Supporter
They could have captured him and let National public radio interview him and they could swoon over his answers...and then NPR could blame the Bush policies for driving him to terrorism.
he could then go on oprah.and dr phil could council him about life...
then He could appear at Joel Osteens church and Joel could smile and say that he is okay,and could have his best life now...if he would just stop with his jihad

I would have greatly enjoyed watching that!
 
Top