He would not be a KJVO person today in the sense those in it would be advocating the use of the term!
He p[probably would desire to see a completed translation off the so called majority text!
This is Must Reading On the KJVO Position!
Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Yeshua1, May 28, 2020.
Page 2 of 7
-
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
it is nasty posts like yours that drive people away from King James Onlyism. By not being gracious in your Christianity, you defeat your own purpose. -
You have not demonstrated that the Scriptures teach a KJV-only view.
KJV-only advocates will disobey clear commands as translated in the KJV in order to try to defend their human KJV-only reasoning/teaching. -
George Antonios Well-Known Member
If you would come down your high hill for a moment, oh noble sir, please consider that:
A) The title said "King James Onlyism" - A New Sect. My reply was after the tenor of his title.
B) According to your thinking, I would answer you that the man has "defamed" many a man under whose tutelage I sat, gone soul winning with, sat in their Sunday School classes, sat with in church, and eaten dinner with, and of whom I can assure you that they could not be further from being sectist, but are godly, good men, and fundamental independent Baptists. Without knowing them, he has defamed them, thus disobeying whatever set of autographs he claims to believe in.
C) Nothing in my words singled out the man. It was as generic a post as could have been. I described general camps.
D) It is nasty, self-righteous, hypocritical, reflexively man-elevating posts like yours that drive people away from Humanisitc Scholarship Onlyism. "By not being gracious in your Christianity, you defeat your own purpose." -
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
Believers reading the KJV as what it actually is, and teaching from the KJV as what it actually is are not defamed in that book.
It is the making of unproven and even false claims for the KJV that is soundly and correctly exposed in that book. Are you suggesting that you oppose the stating of the truth? -
I read your earlier posts that presented your KJV-only reasoning, and I have read over 150 books written by KJV-only authors. I have carefully studied KJV-only reasoning/teaching and have compared it to what the Scriptures teach. -
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
And I suppose you read the posts wherein I say that nothing in the Bible states that, specifically, the KJB is the only words of God, right? ...Right?! -
Instead of applying his logic, you jumped to wrong conclusions perhaps because of your illogical, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning. His book did not at all advocate humanism. You provide no direct quotations where any supposed defaming of those you suggested was done. You alleged but did not prove what you alleged. -
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I was absolutely sincere in what I said, felt no superiority in the slightest. What you read was outrage, not "unseemly...affected and hypocritical religious superiority."
Again, it is a "new" sect. Virtually no one took the KJVO position among fundamentalists until Peter Ruckman came along with his first book in 1970.
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Tell you what, I'm going to bow out of this thread before I say something I will regret. Have a nice life "Doc." -
Modern, human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching displays a great deal of hypocrisy and arrogance as KJV-only advocates in effect suggest that their subjective opinions are superior to clear scriptural truths.
According to the Scriptures, the wisdom from God above is without partiality while human KJV-only reasoning shows partiality to one exclusive group of biased Church of England priests/critics in 1611.
KJV-only advocates do not apply the same exact standards/measures to the process of the making of the KJV that they inconsistently and unjustly attempt to apply to the making of other English Bible translations. They do not apply the same measures/standards of doctrinal soundness to the Church of England makers of the KJV that they attempt to apply to other Bible translators. -
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Page 2 of 7