I thought that he did an excellent job highlighting just why KJVO is wrong, and while the area of textual criticism much more complication to those for KJVO care to admit!
This is Must Reading On the KJVO Position!
Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Yeshua1, May 28, 2020.
Page 3 of 7
-
-
-
-
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
So the Bible is now simply a natural book then.
And it contains errors.
Great job guys doing the devil's work of sowing disbelief in the actual scriptures that people hold in their hands.
What would we do without our great traditional scholars who help us disbelieve our scriptures?!
Bravo, Bravo! You go guys! You tell those cultists who teach others to believe that there is a perfect Bible, that there is no such thing as a perfect Bible anymore! Yeah you tell them! -
Therefore, they believe that all seeds smaller than mustard seeds must be called something else.
The insistence of absolutely no “error” turns the Bible into something it is not. The scripture is inspired by God, not written by him. (Except for certain specific sections.)
1 Corinthians 1:13-16
Does God have a bad memory? If the God wrote the letter, God forgets what he did a few months ago.
Insisting on an “errorless” Bible is one of the worst things one can teach to a beginning Christian. Now you may get lucky and that Christian may have a skin-deep faith, never get challenged on the Bible, or is just be blissfully stupid. Or you might get another Bart D. Ehrman.
Insisting that something must be true when it is clearly not will cause many who were to lied to to turn on everything they were taught just like Bart did.
I don’t believe sticking one’s head in the sand is an appropriate response to what some may call “errors” in the Bible. Christians should face the issue head on and not by shouting them down like Antifa. -
It is human KJV-only reasoning that would in effect suggest that God did not preserve well enough the actual words He gave by inspiration to the prophets and apostles.
In contradiction to the KJV translators, KJV-only advocates will not accept the preserved Scriptures in the original languages as the proper standard and authority for the trying of all Bible translations. -
Do you try to skip over the truth that the KJV is an English Bible translation in the same sense that the NKJV is an English Bible translation? Would you tell readers of the NKJV to believe it to be perfect? -
-
But the KJV was perfect for leading many to Jesus, as are several modern translations today. God uses imperfect men (& things) to perfectly accomplish His will.
But to say the KJV is a perfect Bible version in all respects is to tell a lie. -
But fact is, GOD preserved the Byz & Alex mss. equally. That should tell critics something ! -
-
-
was the latin Vulgate a real bible, as Eramus and the 1611 translators used it! -
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
George Antonios Well-Known Member
-
-
Page 3 of 7