Obama changed terrorist killings to "murder"...
...early on in his term.
I agree, any act of terrorism that ends up with dead Americans, is an act of war.
Even though I was discouraged with Reagan [for opening the floodgates to illegal immigrants with amnesty], I wonder what he would have done with the terrorist act in Libya?
Of course, he did nothing significant when several 241 marines were killed in Beirut, so maybe he'd have done the same as Obama, NOTHING!
Then again, Bush Jr. probably would have taken a military stance and bombed some rebel/terrosit bases in Libya. Which is why we need that type of leader again? The world didn't know how Bush may respond, and in some ways, they were afraid of Reagan, but no one fears Obama, except those of us who see our incomes finishing at leaps-and-bounds. :tonofbricks:
I stand in agreement that Amb. Stevens and the others were not murdered. They were killed in an ongoing war against the great satan. And this war will not end any time soon.
Like someone once said, "You can kill the man, but not his ideas!" Terrorists have an ideal that will not end with the other side capitulating. Terrorism will never end; therefore, it must be contained with might and strength on the other side. We can never make friends out of radicals dedicated to wiping infidels and Zionists off the face of this earth!
All the protesters against war ought to go and protest in the terrorist camps around the world and see if they leave with their heads intact!
Finally, terrorists must know that we are willing to do whatever is needed in order to stand tall against them. We need to stop worrying about waterboarding, urinating on dead bodies, etc. These men and women have NO morals or values. We see that with every public beheading, suicide bombings at weddings and church meetings, or individual acts of terror to assassinate people around this world who lead their free societies against their radical thinking ways!
Shalom!!!
