Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I would not be upset if Paul was elected but he is no doubt a RINO.
There is a difference with Paul and the others. Paul's support comes primarily because of his support of the issues. He admits that he is outside the mainstream Republican Party and that he is libertarian in his views. As well, he is a conservative.
Newt and Mitt are not really conservative and while a part of the Republican platform, have been on the other side on major issues.
I have not seen anything to indicate that Newt is not conservative. Mitt is questionable.
There is a difference with Paul and the others. Paul's support comes primarily because of his support of the issues. He admits that he is outside the mainstream Republican Party and that he is libertarian in his views. As well, he is a conservative.
Newt and Mitt are not really conservative and while a part of the Republican platform, have been on the other side on major issues.
I have not seen anything to indicate that Newt is not conservative. Mitt is questionable.
Mitt has endorsed some of the biggest entitlement programs in our history. The original article cited here have other issues, but here are some of the things cited earlier in this thread:
2. Who bragged about being a moderate with this comment, “There is a new synthesis evolving with the classic moderate wing of the party, where as a former Rockefeller state chairman, I’ve spent most of my life”?
B. Newt Gingrich
3. Who starred in a 2007 global warming commercial with Nancy Pelosi that was sponsored by Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection?
B. Newt Gingrich
5. Who was paid $312,000 by ethanol interests and then said ethanol is good for national security and for the economy?
B. Newt Gingrich
8. Which candidate has consistently supported the type of individual mandates for health insurance that conservatives are trying to overturn through court challenges to Obamacare? (Trick question: Two of three are correct answers.)
A. Mitt Romney
B. Newt Gingrich
9. Which candidate went on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and called Paul Ryan’s Medicare plan “radical” and “right-wing social engineering”?
B. Newt Gingrich
11. Which candidate bragged to CNN that he’s “the most seriously professorial politician since Woodrow Wilson”? (pretty scary if you ask me)
B. Newt Gingrich
13. Which candidate said of the Medicare prescription drug plan that was the largest expansion of entitlements since the Great Society, “Every conservative member of Congress should vote for this Medicare bill. Obstructionist conservatives can always find reasons to vote no”?
B. Newt Gingrich
14. Which candidate attacked Steve Largent, Tom Coburn and other conservatives as “the Perfectionist Caucus,” while giving his last speech as speaker in support of Dick Gephardt and Dave Obey’s colossal Omnibus Bill of 1998?
B. Newt Gingrich
There is nothing here that indicates Newt is not a Conservative. People really need to think things through rather than compile lists without context.
As well, supporting the individual mandate?
I would like to see the full context of this.
You're a big girl, go google it if you're really, really serious about wanting to peruse it.
Then come back and tell us what you found.
It has been suggested that the Republicans who would be president are determined to turn the clock back seventy-five years and “rescind the New Deal.”
Now, Newt Gingrich has gone his rivals one better.
The former Speaker of the House, and sudden contender for the 2012 GOP presidential nod, is not about to stop with the New Deal. He wants to turn the clock back 100 years and rescind the progressive era.
This is no small threat. While the New Deal brought a measure of economic security to the American experiment, along with a bolder vision of what government could do to tame the wildest excesses of bankers and speculators, it was the Progressive Era that introduced measures of basic humanity and democratic aspiration to the project.
B. Newt Gingrich
3. Who starred in a 2007 global warming commercial with Nancy Pelosi that was sponsored by Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection?
B. Newt Gingrich
8. Which candidate has consistently supported the type of individual mandates for health insurance that conservatives are trying to overturn through court challenges to Obamacare? (Trick question: Two of three are correct answers.)
B. Newt Gingrich
9. Which candidate went on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and called Paul Ryan’s Medicare plan “radical” and “right-wing social engineering”?
My own view is that Republicans would have been better served by the candidacies of Mitch Daniels, Paul Ryan or Chris Christie. Unfortunately, none is running.
You play the hand you're dealt. This is a weak Republican field with two flawed front-runners contesting an immensely important election. If Obama wins, he'll take the country to a place from which it will not be able to return (precisely his goal for a second term).
Every conservative has thus to ask himself two questions: Who is more likely to prevent that second term? And who, if elected, is less likely to unpleasantly surprise?
But where are the ads attacking Gingrich? There aren’t any. It is unprecedented for a Democratic candidate to take sides in a Republican presidential primary. But Obama is doing it. He is scared to death of Romney. All of the things which make his nomination more problematic among conservatives, strengthen his credentials to defeat Obama in November. His former pro choice posture, his embrace of gay civil unions (but not marriage), and his sponsorship of Romneycare in Massachusetts — despite its obvious differences from Obama’s program — make him more acceptable to independents. So Obama is determined to vote in the Republican Primary for Newt.
Bill Clinton, doubtless following the same instincts, says positive things about Gingrich. The Democrats want to defeat Romney.
But they may be wrong. Newt is the better debate and would, doubtless, destroy Obama in a face to face confrontation. And Newt’s creative thinking and original ideas might well appeal to an electorate used to sound bites that mean nothing and lead nowhere.
Whether Obama and his strategists are right or wrong to root for Newt to win the Republican primary, we conservatives must deny them a vote in our contest. We should note their position and take it into account in our own votes. But don’t let Obama tell us who to nominate.
You're a big girl, go google it if you're really, really serious about wanting to peruse it.
Then come back and tell us what you found.
My experience with RP supporters is that they see vague descriptions of the positions of other candidates and jump on them without a any clear context. Their responses are often not very well thought out and are mostly based on emotion much like the left wing. While this is not all of them it appears to be the larger portion of them.
Just posting a single sentence of someone's position should never be evidence enough to make a judgment. Much like scripture context is very important.
quadruple posting is breaking a rule.
Um, hate to break it to you, but your "big girl" is a dude... :laugh: