1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why I do what I do the way I do it

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Luke2427, Nov 7, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    No, I am not saying that.

    But I do think that one who does not know Greek and Hebrew (I do not) should have the humility to utilize the many and various works of those who do.

    As to which is most important- I cannot help but see these things as an essential whole.

    If one tries to develop doctrine out of the Proverbs with no understanding of its literary genre then that person could be dangerous.

    If one interprets Acts 2:38 with no concern for the historical orthodox Christian perspective on that verse and no concern with any systematic theology- that person can be VERY dangerous.

    So I cannot say. But I think I know you well enough to safely assume that you are at least to some degree in agreement with that statement you quote.
     
  2. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0

    Rude people always excuse their bad behavior.
     
  3. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    I answered that a few posts back.
     
  4. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    No one is questioning anyone's legal right to post on this forum.

    I am speaking about your moral obligation before God.

    These are very different things.
     
  5. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    I never said he couldn't. I was just curious about what he said. Luke said if you didn't know basic things like context, original intent of the author.... I would say one should know those things before speaking/writing about a passage. Those are the basics.
     
  6. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Oh yeah. You said "I" would be the one to know how much I know. :)confused:)

    Doesn't that put you right back where you started? Ignorant people thinking they know things they don't know?

    In other words, for your plan to work, somebody smarter than me has to critique all my posts before they're published so as to be sure that I don't spread ignorance and heresy. :BangHead:
     
  7. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ok, so who on this board should decide if Matt knows these things and is qualified to post? Matt can't decide this for himself because he may just be acting out of ignorance. :tonofbricks:
     
  8. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Absolutely. If you are not yourself a credible or lettered scholar, somebody smarter than you should critique all your posts on weighty theological matters before you post them.

    That somebody should be numerous people. Those people should span a broad spectrum of church history. Those people should be respected scholars in their fields. Many of those people will be in heaven but their works are readily available for you to utilize. And you should absolutely consult with them before you post on weighty matters.

    That this is so ought to be patently obvious to any objective thinker in light of the seriousness of those matters which have to do with the glory of God and the eternal souls of men- especially in a venue such as this where potentially THOUSANDS of people could read what you post and think you know what you are talking about and believe it.

    Absolutely.
     
    #28 Luke2427, Nov 7, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 7, 2011
  9. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    I figured that would be your answer. I'm like you, I don't know Greek/Hebrew.

    Just some other thoughts about studying Scriptures.
    1. Knowing the context is vital to understanding the meaning of the passage. It's easy to read an isolated verse and think it means something else because of something we may be studying at the time.

    2. Original intent of the author is very important as well. If a passage didn't mean "A" to Paul, then it cannot mean "A" to us.

    3. Knowing the purpose of the book itself. Matthew and Mark write about similar events, but with a different purpose.

    4. Know the historical context. What was going on at the time.

    5. Use the English term the same way the author used the original term. If you are like me, I'm do not know Greek. I have to rely on others.

    this is just a summary list that I just threw together. When we discuss the Bible, it's important to not just find a passage that sounds like it supports us. We should rather find what the Bible says.
     
  10. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    Amy, I was commenting on him taking out one of the important things and ignoring the rest. Do you think one should speak on a subject they have not prepared for? If I'm telling you a passage means something, but I don't look at the context or anything, would you even think of listening to me? Of course not. Matt took original language out by itself. That's why I asked Luke to clarify what he meant by that.
     
  11. Don

    Don Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    11,048
    Likes Received:
    321
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Luke - I've asked this before, but don't recall your answer: do you consider yourself the eyes, the mouth, the hands, the feet, or some other part?
     
  12. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    This is absolutely right.

    I would add that we should all recognize the danger of those who do not care at all for such things and post as if they speak facts and even speak the oracles of God.

    It is exactly a negligence of care for such things that has given us EVERY SINGLE DAMNABLE HERESY we battle in our day.

    There is no Mormonism apart from such evil negligence.
    There is no United Pentecostalism apart from a disdain for such things.
    There is no Rob Bell universalism apart from such irreverent handling of the sacred Scripture.
    Joel Osteen CANNOT thrive in a Christian culture that embraces such things as you cite above.

    A negligence, a lack of concern for such things ought to be resisted by every one of us because it is, at the very least, one of the greatest evils we face in our culture.
     
    #32 Luke2427, Nov 7, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 7, 2011
  13. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    I do not know.

    I do not know if any of us know the answer to that question.

    Does the hand KNOW it is a hand or does it just do what it can with the ability it has been given?

    I do not know.
     
  14. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ok. So for example, since I believe Calvinism is error, should I be allowed to post that?
     
  15. 12strings

    12strings Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,743
    Likes Received:
    0

    Luke, I think that's what this forum IS. I post something that may or may not be correct, then lots of people tell me where and how I am wrong, and where and how I am right. If I later determine that I have posted something in error, I should post a correction, or apology if I have posted something mean-spirited. Many on this forum have done just that.

    The point is this is a forum for to debate issues. And you as a Calvinist should understand that God has a purpose for allowing people to post ridiculous ideas on this forum...so that the rest of us will be spurred to more study about an issue to better understand our own position.

    I'm glad there's a guy over on the "other-denominations" forum who says that faith has nothing to do with salvation. It makes me articulate the truth better.

    I think all of us, Cal, arm, non-cal, and "other" could be reminded of Paul's advice to a young pastor in 2 Tim. 2: 24 And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, 25 correcting his opponents with gentleness...
     
  16. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Certainly, if you do the work I think we all know ought to be done.
     
  17. Don

    Don Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    11,048
    Likes Received:
    321
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It does what it can as of the ability it has been given; but does that mean it's better than the feet? Or the eyes?
     
  18. seekingthetruth

    seekingthetruth New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey Luke

    Will you let me know when I am smart enough to have a conversation with you?

    John
     
  19. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    That's fine if you communicate clearly that you don't know what you are talking about and that you are presenting unproven hypotheses that you are asking for help in proving or disproving.

    And as for the verse that you post at the end- that verse is absolutely saying that this is the general rule in our dealings.

    But what this verse is NOT doing is condmening Paul's bluntness when he withstood Peter to the face.

    What it is not doing is contradicting what Paul said when he said that we should condemn to very HELL those that preach another Gospel.

    What it is certainly not doing is undermining Peter's handling of Simon when he said to take his money to hell with him.

    What is clearly not doing is condemning Paul for saying, “You son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, full of all deceit and villainy, will you not stop making crooked the straight paths of the Lord?"

    What is most assuredly not doing is condemning Christ for his USUAL way of handling the Pharisees.

    What it is not doing is condemning all of the prophets for their fierce handling of wicked kings and false prophets, etc...

    And we could go on and on and on.
     
  20. 12strings

    12strings Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Forgive me for not remembering the exact context of the following example (the facts are true, but I have forgotten both the pastor's name and the association of churches)... but I believe it favors the view that Sometimes a simple Christian who believes the bible can make positive contributions to a church and a conversation:

    A guest pastor was preaching at a church whose denomination of Baptists had drifted far to the left, until many churches, including this one withdrew to form a new, conservative group. The pastor said something completely orthodox in his sermon, and an old man with a hearing problem stood up and said, "That's not in the Bible!" Those around him explained his error, after which he sat down and later apologized profusely to the preacher. The Guest preacher said, in effect, "If a few more people like you had been around a few years ago, our denomination might not have gotten so far away from God's word."
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...