I won't say NO chance but VERY little. I mean can you imagine "kill the infidels" ........"Now, now let's talk about this, why is it that you feel that way." that is absurd. They want US to die, and for some foolish reason people think we believe what they say?? WE CAN"T so what's to talk about?
It was before my time but I hear the American Gov. took that type of approach with Hitler! Just sit around going "Did he really mean that??"
What if some one wanted to rape your wife would
want a negation manual or a .45?
What changes a persons behavior?.....Conciquences.......Weather we are talking about child training or terrorist control, it doesn't matter. The principal is the same.
If we ask them to do so and so and have no or little recourse if they don't comply, they will NEVER change for the better. So we have weapons for consequences, not for peace talks.
I realize this is off topic so if you want to discuss it further feel free to start a new thread. I won't because of the absurdity of the argument.
I apologise to all for going off topic.......Forgive me.
This is exactly what I am talking about LeBuick.
Only apply your thinking to the domestic terrorist instead of Iran.
Now these militiamen, they don't want to destroy our nation like Iran does.
But they do want to be listened to.
They do want to feel that they have a vote and a voice in America.
You don't have to agree with their views to recognize that they have a right to believe them.
Is our solution to the domestic terror issue is just to point a gun at them?
If the left wants us to use diplomacy and negotiation with extremest Muslim terrorists from overseas then how do they propose we deal with American terrorists?
Is there a hypocrisy here?
I mean to say you will talk to Iran but not to white supremacists here in the US is hypocritical to me.
No one is more racist than a nation like Iran that wants to kill all the Jews.