• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Can a man sin a sin unto death after being born again.

Status
Not open for further replies.

EdSutton

New Member
Brother Bob said:
What kind of sins have you read the Apostles and Deciples committed?
Waayelll! Lesssseeee!

Peter denied the Lord three times, even to cursing and swearing about it. (Matt. 26:69-75; Mk. 14:66-72; Lk. 22:55-61)

Paul disobeyed the Holy Spirit, by going to Jerusalem, ignoring both a prophet specifically sent to warn him, and the brethren who warned him, through the Spirit against going there. (Acts. 21:4, 10-14)

Peter "played the hypocrite" at Antioch, and was so convincing in the hypocrisy, that he even"sucked in" another apostle, Barnabas. (Gal. 2: 11- 21)

Paul took a Jewish vow and later went through the rite of Jewsih purification (hence putting himself back under the Mosaic law after he was saved) at Cenchrae and Jerusalem. (Acts. 18:18 cf Act 21:26)

Paul and Barnabas "fell out" over John Mark. (Acts. 15:36-39)

Will these five work??

BTW, none of these were a "sin unto death".

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EdSutton

New Member
Brother Bob said:
b. He still would have one problem left, and that is "repentance" again, of which there is no repentance after death.
The rich man in the account of Lazarus and the rich man (Dives??) certainly "repented after death".

Since the defintion of "repent" (metanoeO) is a change of mind", he certainly did, wanting his brothers warned!

How many times must one repeat that the the definition of 'repent' (metanoeO) in the NT does not mean "turn from sin"? The Greek word for 'turn' (and/or 'convert') is " 'epistrephO", not "metanoeO".

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EdSutton

New Member
mmetts said:
Would you stand before the throne of glory with your Zondervan Greek Dictionary explaining to God an interpretation of perfect?

Edited for rudeness!
I like that, especially the 'edited' part! :laugh: :laugh:

Ed
 

EdSutton

New Member
charles_creech78 said:
Amen brother Bob.There is no second death to them that are in Christ Jesus. The key word was Born Again. Them that are born again cannot sinn (sic) for his seed remaneth in him and he cannot sin for he is BORN OF GOD.
charles_creech78 said:
Read the title again. You cannot sin a sin like this being Born Again.That is if you have the spirit of God in you. Not you that person that sins like this. You cannot sin a sin like this if you have God in you.
Wait just a doggone minute, please. Which is it? The two above posts do not say the same thing. Is there a difference between "horrible sins" and "ordinary sins", here you are referring to?

And just what makes this distinction, if there is one?

This is a fair question, given what you have put forth in the posts.

So which is it?

And does the blood of Christ actually blot out, and "keep on cleansing us from all sin," or just some of it? (I Jo. 1:7)

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EdSutton

New Member
DHK said:
We are commanded to grow in grace. The entire doctrine of sanctification implies that the Christian life involves maturity and growth. In that process there is failure, and sin. God never condones it, but allows it to happen. The corrective process usually results in a stronger Christian at the end. We can see this process in place through the first epistle of Corinthians just as we can see the process of persecution and suffering as a process of purifying and maturing the Christian in the first epistle of Peter.

Jesus said:
Matthew 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

Can any man love the Lord thy God, with all his heart and mind for just one mind, or even one hour. What would it take? For one hour every thought would have to be completely submitted to Christ. Every part of your body and all your emotions completely submitted to his service--just for one hour. Maybe you can do it for one hour. But for one day? For one week? For one month? for one year? When would you break? When would your thought processes be taken away from totally worshiping Christ, and allowing no other sinful thought into your mind? When would your body cease from serving Him alone? How long could you keep this up. The minute you stop, you sin. Realize the meaning of this verse.
And the second is like unto it.
Good post!

Ed
 

EdSutton

New Member
After my various comments, I will now answer the title and opening question of the thread.
charles_creech78 said:
(Thread title)
icon1.gif
Can a man sin a sin unto death after being born again.


What is your thought on this.
There are actually two questions contained in one, in the thread title. Unfortunately the second is not totally addressed by the title.

So yes, a man can sin a sin unto death after being born again. In fact, I suggest only one who is already a saved individual can sin this sin, Biblically. For in the context, he is called a "brother". And no, this does not mean it is limited to males, for today's PC crowd. BTW, these verses show a difference, and also that "all unrighteousness is (in fact) sin", as well.
14 Now this is the confidence that we have in Him, that if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us. 15 And if we know that He hears us, whatever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we have asked of Him.
16 If anyone sees his brother sinning a sin which does not lead to death, he will ask, and He will give him life for those who commit sin not leading to death. There is sin leading to death. I do not say that he should pray about that. 17 All unrighteousness is sin, and there is sin not leading to death. (I Jo. 5:14-17 , NKJV)

And no, "eternal death" or "second death" is not what is being spoken of here. This is a premature physical death, as I read and compare other Scripture with this one. While I am not necessarily agreeing with all the implicatons of what several others in this thread have already said, they have summed up this part very well, IMO.

Ed
 

mmetts

New Member
Among unbelievers, I would definitely share with them DHK's doctrine of maturity in the Christian faith. Like raising a child in the way he should go.

Among believers, I would share more sharp doctrine. I have convictions about the lack of "newness" in DHK's brief exposition/summary on Christian maturity. Of course, you are correct DHK, exegetically. But when I read your post I felt as though it left out the Holy Spirit's work of making us new. I know DHK is not advocating works of men for salvation, but any doctrinal summary of sanctification during a Christian's walk needs more Romans 6! Much like the Philippians quote earlier which regarded the idea that it is God who works in us.

Also, on the Greek "telios" operating as "complete" in the context of Matthew 5:48, well, their must not be a proper word in English to parallel. Otherwise you are left with a sentence like "be ye therefore complete even as God is complete". I'm not advocating sinlessness, or an idea of perfection but, like Brother Bob, I have convictions regarding the weightier sins which have been mentioned in this thread.

Also, I am not very familiar with John's theology. I bought a commentary on it due to this and am going to take up study. I had an idea though, a "sin unto death" (if the death is indeed a reference to spiritual death) then he might be refering to blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, which of course is unpardonable? I don't think a believer commits that sin though. Hope this helps. :1_grouphug:
 

Brother Bob

New Member
The rich man in the account of Lazarus and the rich man (Dives??) certainly "repented after death".

Since the defintion of "repent" (metanoeO) is a change of mind", he certainly did, wanting his brothers warned!

How many times must one repeat that the the definition of 'repent' (metanoeO) in the NT does not mean "turn from sin"? The Greek word for 'turn' (and/or 'convert') is " 'epistrephO", not "metanoeO".

Ed
That defies the scripture of sin unto death, if true. He was not longer in a position to repent. I say ever lost man will change their mind when the flames hit their backside, is that "repentance", I don't think so.

Hbr 6:6If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put [him] to an open shame.

I think Repentance is just a little bit more than just changing the mind, it also must involve the Lord.

I never have accepted your definition of "repentance" to just turn around. If it repent from some man made rule, ok, but we are talking about what is against God, "sin". You must include that he turned from "sin". I don't think the rich man was still sinning, do you???

Repentance is to turn from and not do it anymore. Do you think the rich man, turn from and didn't do it anymore or COULDN'T DO IT ANYMORE.

So you think because the rich man was cast into hell and couldn't do what he was before that he turned? :) You would too.
jeepers!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Brother Bob

New Member
Peter denied the Lord three times, even to cursing and swearing about it. (Matt. 26:69-75; Mk. 14:66-72; Lk. 22:55-61)
Did not have the indwelling Holy Spirit.

Acts 21:4
4: And finding disciples, we tarried there seven days: who said to Paul through the Spirit, that he should not go up to Jerusalem.
5: And when we had accomplished those days, we departed and went our way; and they all brought us on our way, with wives and children, till we were out of the city: and we kneeled down on the shore, and prayed.
What are you accusing Apostle Paul of here Ed?

Paul took a Jewish vow and later went through the rite of Jewsih purification (hence putting himself back under the Mosaic law after he was saved) at Cenchrae and Jerusalem. (Acts. 18:18 cf Act 21:26)
7: And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man's house, named Justus, one that worshipped God, whose house joined hard to the synagogue.
8: And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house; and many of the Corinthians hearing believed, and were baptized.
9: Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:

Paul did the bidding of the Lord. Are you making it up as you go Ed???

Paul and Barnabas "fell out" over John Mark. (Acts. 15:36-39)
Acts. 15:36
36: And some days after Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they do.
37: And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark.
38: But Paul thought not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work.
39: And the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder one from the other: and so Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus;

Eph 4:26Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:

Why don't you cut Apostle Paul some slack Ed;, He may of had good reason for not wanting Mark to go, you do not know now, do you???

I expected better of you Ed;?

BTW Ed; We had this discussion before and I cannot remember if you agreed with DHK that the scripture we are discussing was talking about someone receiving an early death? If you did not agree with the early death, excuse me asking. If you did agree with the early death and the Lord said this person had committed a sin, where there was no repentance, how would an early death help him?



 
Last edited by a moderator:

EdSutton

New Member
Brother Bob said:


I expected better of you Ed;?

Well, you know how it is with some of us. We just do the best we can, you know, like giving Scriptural examples, when called on. :)

One did not have to have the "indwelling Holy Spirit" in order not to sin, else no one before Pentecost could have done this. I cetainly do not figure everything the OT saints did was actually sin, since they did not have the Holy Spirit. In fact, the only two individuals ever said to have "walked with God" were Enoch and Noah, neither of which had the indwelling Holy Spirit. (Peter)

I am not accusing anyone of anything. Biut Scripture does say that The Holy Spirit, through these believers warned Paul that he should not go to Jerusalem. He went anyway, even ignoring the prophecy of Agabus, who was sent to warn him, also. I presume Agabius did not just suddenly 'get a hankerin' to up and travel just to warn Paul, on his own. If the Holy Spirit told you or me to do or not do something, and we did it anyway, would you not consider that to be sin? (Paul)

How did you manage to overlook Peter at Antioch?? Just wonderin'! (Peter)

Paul was never told to take any Jewish vow, that I can find. But God did not stop everything because he did it, and still used him, even though he had done something that went against his own preaching and writing found in Scriptures, about not being under the law, any more. (Paul)

There were two in that fight, so I'm perfectly willing to "cut Paul some slack". Barnabas may have been the one wrong, entirely. Or it could have been Paul. Scripture does not assign any blame on this, but the two "fell out", over Mark. So assign the blame to Barnabas. I figured one of them did 'sin' in this, but I could be wrong here. I would still have expected better from two apostles, personally. (Barnabas and Paul)

And your question was about "disciples and Apostles", remember?

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

npetreley

New Member
I've skimmed through the thread and I don't see any clear answer to these questions:

Is there a sin (as in a single, specific sin) that is unto death? If so, any guesses as to what that sin may be?

Or is the passage saying there are many sins unto death, and when you see someone commit any such sin, don't pray about that? In this latter case, anyone have any ideas what such sins may be (besides the disrespecting of the Lord's supper)?
 

Brother Bob

New Member
There were two in that fight. Barnabas amy have been the one wrong, entirely. Or it could have been Paul. Scripture does not assign any blame on this, but the two "fell out", over Mark. So assign the blame to Barnabas. I figured one of them did 'sin' in this, but I could be wong here. I would still have expected better from two apostles, personally. (Barnabas and Paul)

Ed
Why? They were human just like you and I.

I am not accusing anyone of anything. Biut Scripture does say that The Holy Spirit, through these believers warned Paul that he should not go to Jerusalem. He went anyway, even ignoring the prophecy of Agabus, who was sent to warn him, also. I presume Agabius did not just suddenly 'get a hankerin' to up and travel just to warn Paul, on his own. If the Holy Spirit told you or me to do or not do something, and we did it anyway, would you not consider that to be sin? (Paul)
I really never read where Paul went anyway, I thought they tarried seven days.

One did not have to have the "indwelling Holy Spirit" in order not to sin. (Peter)
Agree.

Well, you know how it is with some of us. We just do the best we can, you know, like giving Scriptural examples, when called on. :)
Yea, as long as I have the same privilege to respond.
 

EdSutton

New Member
Brother Bob said:
Why? They were human just like you and I.


I really never read where Paul went anyway, I thought they tarried seven days.


Agree.


Yea, as long as I have the same privilege to respond.
Of course, but please slow down. I ain't got done editing my last post yet! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Ed
 

Brother Bob

New Member
I've skimmed through the thread and I don't see any clear answer to these questions:

Is there a sin (as in a single, specific sin) that is unto death? If so, any guesses as to what that sin may be?

Or is the passage saying there are many sins unto death, and when you see someone commit any such sin, don't pray about that? In this latter case, anyone have any ideas what such sins may be (besides the disrespecting of the Lord's supper)?
We accept all the other scripture teaching that OSAS, but this one which is telling us how impossible it is for a child of God to go back to the devil, we don't accept it for what it is. IMO
 

mmetts

New Member
DHK said:
I am not accusing anyone of anything. But Scripture does say that The Holy Spirit, through these believers warned Paul that he should not go to Jerusalem. He went anyway, even ignoring the prophecy of Agabus, who was sent to warn him, also. I presume Agabus did not just suddenly 'get a hankerin' to up and travel just to warn Paul, on his own. If the Holy Spirit told you or me to do or not do something, and we did it anyway, would you not consider that to be sin? (Paul)

Great point. But, Paul's authority greatly overwrote any of NT prophets. Agabus could scarcely be called a prophet too, by even NT standards. His prophecy was awfully incorrect and he was wrong on several major details. Yet, the text is clear, he prophesied in the Holy Spirit.
 

EdSutton

New Member
Brother Bob said:
I think Repentance is just a little bit more than just changing the mind, it also must involve the Lord.

I never have accepted your definition of "repentance" to just turn around.
Since I have never defined repentance as "turn around", at all, I don't get this statement.

In Scripture, the "object" of "repent" is defined by the context. What I have said continually, is that the "repentance" necessary for salvation is as follows - "repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ" (Ac. 20:21) and/or "repentance from dead works and of faith toward God." (Heb. 6:1) I have also said that "repent/repentance is, in essence, the 'flip-side' of believe/faith."

There is nothing wrong, per se, with the phrase "repent of/from sin", although the phrase is not to be found in Scripture. It is something that the Christian should do - change your mind (thinking) about sin, and not do it, and that on a continual basis, IMO. But there is not a 'one size fits all' definition with an object of "repent".'

And I have asked many times exactly what sins "did God repent of" or "not repent of" in the OT where He is said 30 times to have repented or not repented. (I ask the question for those that insist that repent "really means 'repent of (your) sins'".)

My question has been answered in a year and a half, exactly zero times!

Wonder why?

Gotta' run for now!

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
mmetts said:
Among unbelievers, I would definitely share with them DHK's doctrine of maturity in the Christian faith. Like raising a child in the way he should go.

Among believers, I would share more sharp doctrine. I have convictions about the lack of "newness" in DHK's brief exposition/summary on Christian maturity. Of course, you are correct DHK, exegetically. But when I read your post I felt as though it left out the Holy Spirit's work of making us new. I know DHK is not advocating works of men for salvation, but any doctrinal summary of sanctification during a Christian's walk needs more Romans 6! Much like the Philippians quote earlier which regarded the idea that it is God who works in us.
Philippians 1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:

The day that we are saved Christ, by the power of his Holy Spirit, comes and indwells the believer giving him the power to overcome temptation. Salvation is all of God. God saves us, and God keeps us. His grace is sufficient for us. Perhaps the most common theme spoke of in the NT associated with the believer after salvation is suffering. It is something we don't like to think of, but it is there, and the Holy Spirit gives grace to see us through.

Philippians 1:29 For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake;
--It is not just God's will to believe in Christ, but also to suffer for him. Suffering is part of the Christian life.

Romans 8:17 And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.
--Why the caveat put here? We are heirs if we suffer with him. Again suffering is part and parcel of the Christian life.

Acts 14:22 Confirming the souls of the disciples, and exhorting them to continue in the faith, and that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God.
--Paul returned through all the cities wherein he had started churches, appointing pastors, exhorting the believers, and telling them that they must suffer much tribulation to enter into the kingdom of God.
Again suffering is associated closely with salvation. They suffered as believers, after they were saved.

Paul suffered much. We know that from his own personal accounts. But how did he deal with it?

Romans 6:11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
--He had to reckon his body to be dead unto sin. He had to say no the carnal desires of his flesh every day--treat them as if they didn't exist. He knew he was in a spiritual battle, not a carnal one.

2 Corinthians 10:4-5 (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
--Every thought and imagination had to brought into captivity; unto the obedience of Jesus Christ. He would win the battle with his mind submitted to the Holy Spirit. He would crucify the flesh.

Galatians 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
--A cross is an instrument of death. Christ, along with the two thieves were executed on crosses. They were crucified; put to death. It was the common form of execution. Paul says that he has put to death his carnal desires. He treats himself as if he were dead. Yet he lives. It is not "him" (Paul) that lives. It is Christ that lives in him. His life is totally surrendered to Christ. Every action and thought must be surrendered to him. Though he has a body of flesh, he doesn't live by the flesh (carnal desires), but by the faith of the son of God.

In 1Cor.15:31, he describes how this is an on-going battle for he says:
"I die daily."
--Every day he puts his body to death. It is not a one time act. Sanctification is an on-going process with the help of the Holy Spirit yielding oneself to Christ.

Jesus taught the same thing:
Luke 9:23 And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.
--If you will follow Christ you must deny yourself--say no to those things that you want; you must take up your cross. Christ died on the cross--an instrument of death. Put the body to death. Say no to all your desires and fleshly desires and yes to the desires that Christ has for you. Do it daily. Then you are fit to follow Christ.

Luke 9:62--No man having put his hand and turning back is fit for the kingdom of God. Discipleship is not easy. It takes suffering. Suffering is always associated with the Christian life, as is perseverence. It doesn't mean you won't sin; or you won't fail. "A just man will fall seven times and get up again." (Prov.24:16).

It is difficult but it is the most rewarding and satisfying life one could ever find. "My grace is sufficient for you."
"I am come to give life and live more abundantly."
 

JustChristian

New Member
npetreley said:
I've skimmed through the thread and I don't see any clear answer to these questions:

Is there a sin (as in a single, specific sin) that is unto death? If so, any guesses as to what that sin may be?

Or is the passage saying there are many sins unto death, and when you see someone commit any such sin, don't pray about that? In this latter case, anyone have any ideas what such sins may be (besides the disrespecting of the Lord's supper)?


There is no single sin, except perhaps Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, which can sentence a believer to Hell. The question is rather who is the master of your life. Jesus said that no man can serve two masters. If someone serves Satan rather than Christ He will suffer the second death. There is no such thing as a carnal Christian.
 

EdSutton

New Member
BaptistBeliever said:
There is no such thing as a carnal Christian.
No?? Really??
Romans 7:14
For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Was Paul a Christian, at this time? Here he said even he (Paul) "am carnal." He did not say he used to be carnal, in the past.
1 Corinthians 1
Greeting
1 Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,
2 To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours:
3 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.Spiritual Gifts at Corinth
4 I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given to you by Christ Jesus, 5 that you were enriched in everything by Him in all utterance and all knowledge, 6 even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you, 7 so that you come short in no gift, eagerly waiting for the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, 8 who will also confirm you to the end, that you may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9 God is faithful, by whom you were called into the fellowship of His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.
Sectarianism Is Sin
10 Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.
I believe these are Christian whom Paul is addressing, by the language, don't you?? And what is he about to say about them? Let's see!
1 Corinthians 3
Sectarianism Is Carnal
1 And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual people but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. 2 I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able to receive it, and even now you are still not able; 3 for you are still carnal. For where there are envy, strife, and divisions among you, are you not carnal and behaving like mere men? 4 For when one says, “I am of Paul,” and another, “I am of Apollos,” are you not carnal?
Watering, Working, Warning
5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers through whom you believed, as the Lord gave to each one? 6 I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase. 7 So then neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase. 8 Now he who plants and he who waters are one, and each one will receive his own reward according to his own labor.
9 For we are God’s fellow workers; you are God’s field, you are God’s building.
Uh, seems Paul thinks they are carnal for he says so. You did note that he calls them brethren, including himself with them, when he says "brethren". He says they are "God's building", something that cannot be said of the unsaved, and also calls them "God's field." And he equates carnal with babes in Christ, and contrasts it with spiritual. They were still sucking on that milk, spiritually, and could not handle the meat of the Word, yet. Hence carnal is equal to immature, and is contrasted with spiritually mature.

With all respect, I think I prefer Paul's opinion (Ya' know, bein' as it is in the Bible and all...) over one that says "There is no such thing as a carnal Christian."

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top