Uh, I believe the one who told this parable is named Jesus. (Luke 19:12-27)
BTW, since this parable is about a nobleman who went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and return, who is this nobleman Jesus is speaking of?
Ya' think just maybe He might be speaking of Himself??
And He does end this parable with the nobleman talking about his enemies who didn't want him to reign over them, and he then commanded those who stood by to "bring here my enemies ... and slay them before me. (You think, maybe those who only want to see a "spiritual kingdom" and have nothing to do with a "physical kingdom", might somehow fit this classification of "who did not want me to reign over them"?? Just askin'!)
Oh yeah, he did start the parable after the declaration that Jesus and the disciples were nearing Jerusalem, and they (the disciples) thought the Kingdom of God "would appear immediately".
Hmmmm!
Kinda' does give one pause, no?? :D
Ed
How to defeat the ME heresy
Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by npetreley, Aug 6, 2007.
Page 10 of 16
-
Last time I answer these questions for you. They just may be too deep for you to grasp.
-
The method by which we repsond to the title of the op is to open your Bible under the leading of the Holy Ghost and believe what it says. ME is now defeated.
-
Sin is a transgression of the law (1John 3:4). That's God's definition. We don't need to go by the RCC's definition of sin. That is what you seem to follow. -
1 John 5:
16: If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it.
17: All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
18: We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.
19: And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.
20: And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.
21: Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.
It is so simple how Jesus separated the sins!!!!
Why, do you deny Jesus's word Himself? I do not understand. You are not alone though, there are several on here that are blinded to this scripture, and I do not know why. How could it help anyone to deny what Jesus said about "sin" itself, I will never know.:tear: -
All unrighteousness sin. Note that! All unrighteousness; not some--but all. There is no division in sin. God, not you, knows what "a sin unto death" is. He is the one that decides. It is the last step in his process of judicial judgement on the believer. And I trust that you won't take God's judgement into your own hands.
Sin is the transgression of the law. (1John 3:4) It is a simple Scriptural definition of sin. Why not just accept it.
For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. (Rom.3:23)
--Sin is coming short of God's glory. It is missing his mark of holiness. We fail in that area as well. Are you as holy as He is? You sin when you miss that mark.
All sin is equal in God's sight. Any one sin is bad enough to condemn a person to hell. The consequences of our sins may be different. But all sin is rebellion against God, and thus there is no difference before God in whatever the sin may be. Sin is sin. -
1Jo 5:17All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death. Answer please, what is it? -
Sin is sin, as far as God is concerned, but the penalties for different sins are different. At least here on this earth.
For example, the penalty for adultery is different than the penalty for theft. They're both sins, but the earthly penalties are different. -
-
1Jo 5:17All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
Jesus said this. -
-
Am I allowed to answer the question or is it rhetorical?
Seems like a rather silly conclusion to come to, having read my post.
I believe you may have missed, willingly ignored, or else misunderstood my point.
Lacy -
Anyway, I liked your post, best post of the night for me. -
-
Oirigin (circa 150 AD) was the one who started most of this allegorical interpretation. Of course, he was a Catholic and likely you are getting the same "feed" as his Bible.
skypair -
skypair -
PUTTING ME-ers ON NOTICE.
Rufus -- do you believe there is a "sin unto death?" Do you believe that would be sufficient punishment for the believer-sinner? Do you believe that misery in this life on account of sin is enough "purgatory" to go through and TO BE all that God has intended??
We're talking mostly about spiritual punishment but look at the man in 1Cor 5:1-5 who was cast out of the church/"kingdom." He was "delivered unto Satan," bro! That there seems to be the "kingdom" and the purgatory you are alluding to in your "if you don't obey, you're goin' to hell for 1000 years!" :tonofbricks: No believer is going to hell. And the kingdom they miss is the one we live in right now.
Look y'all, ME'ers. I hate to spoil your party but the "gig is up." Now that it has been shown you what you are referring to, it is your responsibility to "save others... pulling them out of the fire: hating even the garment spotted by the flesh."
Please stop the "Catholic-like insanity!"
skypair -
As for the "pearl" --- Jesus paid the price for the Gentiles, too -- the "left behind" church who convert in the tribulation (See Mt 25:31-46, same-same). Course, Gentiles are in the "sea" of peoples, right? like pearls?
skypair -
skpair -
skypair
Page 10 of 16